Bad News For Obama: Chattanooga attacks officially called 'terrorism'

Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.
There have been way more than that. Have you already forgotten Sandy Hook? Colorado Springs? Aurora?

None of those were terrorist attacks, and may not be used for your anti-gun propaganda purposes without first cuing the Laff Trak.
Yeah they were just nice kids that the world was mean to. We should celebrate them really, right?
 
You blame Obama. I blame Bush. That seems to be what the board is all about.

This THREAD is NOT about Bush, and to continue to attempt to hijack it with your homophobic love/hate obsession with Bush IS a violation of the rules on this board.
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama. This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.

Explain this "goodwill" that was accrued after 9/11? This should be interesting
Remember when Bush had a 90% approval rating? Anybody?
Remember when Obama had a 65% approval rating? Anybody?
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.
There have been way more than that. Have you already forgotten Sandy Hook? Colorado Springs? Aurora?

None of those were terrorist attacks, and may not be used for your anti-gun propaganda purposes without first cuing the Laff Trak.
Yeah they were just nice kids that the world was mean to. We should celebrate them really, right?

No, they were individual crackpots with personal delusions who were left on the street too long.
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama. This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.

Explain this "goodwill" that was accrued after 9/11? This should be interesting
Remember when Bush had a 90% approval rating? Anybody?
Remember when Obama had a 65% approval rating? Anybody?
That was never the case. So no. Remember when the GOP congress had a 20% approval rating? No? I don't blame you that was a long time ago. But you can always hope they get back there.
 
There was no problem with the majority of Muslims when we invaded Afghanistan. The problems started when Bush spun a yarn about WMDs.

Which yarn was that? It's now known Saddam had WMDs. You need to get up to speed and then comment
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama. This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.

So the 7 years under Obama and the terrorist still hate us just like they did under Carter.
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama. This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.

Explain this "goodwill" that was accrued after 9/11? This should be interesting
Remember when Bush had a 90% approval rating? Anybody?
Remember when Obama had a 65% approval rating? Anybody?
That was never the case. So no. Remember when the GOP congress had a 20% approval rating? No? I don't blame you that was a long time ago. But you can always hope they get back there.
Off topic.
But yes, Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama had a 67% approval.
 
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.
And there ya have it.... 7 years later... and Boooooooosssssshhhhhhhh. What a fruitcake.
There YOU have it, thinking that's a cogent argument, when everyone knows actions have repercussions and bad actions have bad repercussions. The right never seems to have a problem blaming FDR over things they think he did wrong. What's the difference?
 
You blame Obama. I blame Bush. That seems to be what the board is all about.
This THREAD is NOT about Bush, and to continue to attempt to hijack it with your homophobic love/hate obsession with Bush IS a violation of the rules on this board.
You're just pissed because I'm attacking instead of defending. What right have you to decide how I want to frame my argument?
 
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.
One of the moderators needs to drag your monkey ass and your post off for trying to hijack / divert the thread AGAIN with your homophobic love/hate obsession with Bush!
Are you trying to interfere with my constitutional right to present an alternate version of the event in question? :ack-1:

easy works for the government?
 
Which yarn was that? It's now known Saddam had WMDs. You need to get up to speed and then comment
Konrad conveniently neglects to mention the many, MANY prominent Dems who made the case for the US to go to war in Iraq, declaring that we HAD to, before voting to give Bush the authority to do so, perhaps doing so because it is inconvenient to his narrative. He also does so to continue his attempt to hijack the thread so no one continues to talk about how Obama has been a complete failure against terrorism, how he has aided, abetted, supplied, armed, trained, protected them and even used our military to help the perpetrators of 9/11/01 take over their own country.

He doesn't want anyone to remember that after the 9/11/01 attack there were no more successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Bush - no more dead Americans on US soil. He doesn't want anyone to focus on the 4 successful terrorist attacks under Obama, how Americans died because of his failures, and how Americans died needlessly because HE and HIS administration either failed (refused) to act or was too incompetent.

He wants people to believe that Bush was horrible, while protecting Americans from any further terrorist attacks after 9/11/01; yet, he doesn't even want to talk about Obama's responsibility for 4 attacks on US soild, 20 simultaneous attacks on US Embassies on 9/11/12, 4 over run, and 4 more dead Americans added to his needless body count.
 
Which yarn was that? It's now known Saddam had WMDs. You need to get up to speed and then comment
Konrad conveniently neglects to mention the many, MANY prominent Dems who made the case for the US to go to war in Iraq, declaring that we HAD to, before voting to give Bush the authority to do so, perhaps doing so because it is inconvenient to his narrative. He also does so to continue his attempt to hijack the thread so no one continues to talk about how Obama has been a complete failure against terrorism, how he has aided, abetted, supplied, armed, trained, protected them and even used our military to help the perpetrators of 9/11/01 take over their own country.

He doesn't want anyone to remember that after the 9/11/01 attack there were no more successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Bush - no more dead Americans on US soil. He doesn't want anyone to focus on the 4 successful terrorist attacks under Obama, how Americans died because of his failures, and how Americans died needlessly because HE and HIS administration either failed (refused) to act or was too incompetent.

He wants people to believe that Bush was horrible, while protecting Americans from any further terrorist attacks after 9/11/01; yet, he doesn't even want to talk about Obama's responsibility for 4 attacks on US soild, 20 simultaneous attacks on US Embassies on 9/11/12, 4 over run, and 4 more dead Americans added to his needless body count.

Konrad and the other left loons think the term WMD only applies to nukes, it doesn't
 
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.
One of the moderators needs to drag your monkey ass and your post off for trying to hijack / divert the thread AGAIN with your homophobic love/hate obsession with Bush!
Are you trying to interfere with my constitutional right to present an alternate version of the event in question?
easy works for the government?
Sounds like he's angling for a position in a fascist Trump regime.
 
If Bush hadn't squandered the goodwill we accrued after 9/11 by invading Iraq for spurious reasons, we wouldn't be in this mess.

Explain this "goodwill" that was accrued after 9/11? This should be interesting
Remember when Bush had a 90% approval rating? Anybody?
Remember when Obama had a 65% approval rating? Anybody?
That was never the case. So no. Remember when the GOP congress had a 20% approval rating? No? I don't blame you that was a long time ago. But you can always hope they get back there.
Off topic.
But yes, Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama had a 67% approval.
Down to hovering around 50%. Not bad for a 7th year President who spent his entire tenure being ceaselessly demonized by right wing lunatics.
 
Down to hovering around 50%. Not bad for a 7th year President who spent his entire tenure being ceaselessly demonized by right wing lunatics.
That's his overall approval rate, which is LESS than 50%. His approval rating and 'trust' rating for dealing with terrorists / terrorism was just rated significantly lower...somewhere around 36%.
 

Forum List

Back
Top