🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

...not to mention Obama was talking about the monumental disaster the GOP and W caused the nation, which he is 100% correct, they sent the debt skyrocketing.

Bush added $4 trillion to the debt in 8 years. Obama has added $7 trillion less than 5 years. Who "sent the debt skyrocketing"?

[MENTION=37749]Black_Label[/MENTION] could not have made a more ignorant comment which contradict his is position more than talking about "skyrocketing debt" :lol:

I disagree. In fact I predict he will make a more ignorant statement in his very next post.
 
...not to mention Obama was talking about the monumental disaster the GOP and W caused the nation, which he is 100% correct, they sent the debt skyrocketing.

Bush added $4 trillion to the debt in 8 years. Obama has added $7 trillion less than 5 years. Who "sent the debt skyrocketing"?

[MENTION=37749]Black_Label[/MENTION] could not have made a more ignorant comment which contradict his is position more than talking about "skyrocketing debt" :lol:

It took two hundred years for this country to accumulate 1 trillion in debt. In eight short years Reagan tripled it to 3 trillion. Bush 2 took office at 5 trillion and doubled it to 10 trillion. In contrast Clinton added less than 2 trillion in eight years. Stop being partisan, both parties own this debt.
 
...not to mention Obama was talking about the monumental disaster the GOP and W caused the nation, which he is 100% correct, they sent the debt skyrocketing.

Bush added $4 trillion to the debt in 8 years. Obama has added $7 trillion less than 5 years. Who "sent the debt skyrocketing"?

[MENTION=37749]Black_Label[/MENTION] could not have made a more ignorant comment which contradict his is position more than talking about "skyrocketing debt" :lol:

It took two hundred years for this country to accumulate 1 trillion in debt. In eight short years Reagan tripled it to 3 trillion. Bush 2 took office at 5 trillion and doubled it to 10 trillion. In contrast Clinton added less than 2 trillion in eight years. Stop being partisan, both parties own this debt.

And cleverly you leave out Obama adding more than everyone else combined.
 
Bush added $4 trillion to the debt in 8 years. Obama has added $7 trillion less than 5 years. Who "sent the debt skyrocketing"?

[MENTION=37749]Black_Label[/MENTION] could not have made a more ignorant comment which contradict his is position more than talking about "skyrocketing debt" :lol:

It took two hundred years for this country to accumulate 1 trillion in debt. In eight short years Reagan tripled it to 3 trillion. Bush 2 took office at 5 trillion and doubled it to 10 trillion. In contrast Clinton added less than 2 trillion in eight years. Stop being partisan, both parties own this debt.

And cleverly you leave out Obama adding more than everyone else combined.

I wasn't leaving anything out, he covered Obama's contribution, was incorrect on Bush's and left out Clinton and Reagan, so I was getting the complete history. And it's near 50/50.
 
It took two hundred years for this country to accumulate 1 trillion in debt. In eight short years Reagan tripled it to 3 trillion. Bush 2 took office at 5 trillion and doubled it to 10 trillion. In contrast Clinton added less than 2 trillion in eight years. Stop being partisan, both parties own this debt.

And cleverly you leave out Obama adding more than everyone else combined.

I wasn't leaving anything out, he covered Obama's contribution, was incorrect on Bush's and left out Clinton and Reagan, so I was getting the complete history. And it's near 50/50.

No. Reagan and Bush added 7T, Obama alone added 7T. That's 16 years in office vs 5 years in office. I dont know what math allows you call that "50/50". But I know libs are bad at math.
 
Barry is not 100% "right!" He's a 100% "left!" He's also a lying POS!
 
And cleverly you leave out Obama adding more than everyone else combined.

I wasn't leaving anything out, he covered Obama's contribution, was incorrect on Bush's and left out Clinton and Reagan, so I was getting the complete history. And it's near 50/50.

No. Reagan and Bush added 7T, Obama alone added 7T. That's 16 years in office vs 5 years in office. I dont know what math allows you call that "50/50". But I know libs are bad at math.

Reagan, Bush and Bush added a combined 9 trillion that's a little more than half the entire ND.

History of the United States public debt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
...not to mention Obama was talking about the monumental disaster the GOP and W caused the nation, which he is 100% correct, they sent the debt skyrocketing.

Bush added $4 trillion to the debt in 8 years. Obama has added $7 trillion less than 5 years. Who "sent the debt skyrocketing"?

[MENTION=37749]Black_Label[/MENTION] could not have made a more ignorant comment which contradict his is position more than talking about "skyrocketing debt" :lol:

It took two hundred years for this country to accumulate 1 trillion in debt. In eight short years Reagan tripled it to 3 trillion. Bush 2 took office at 5 trillion and doubled it to 10 trillion. In contrast Clinton added less than 2 trillion in eight years. Stop being partisan, both parties own this debt.

It took 232 years to accumulate $10 trillion in debt. It took Obama 4 years to add nearly $7 trillion more.

It's pretty clear than one asshole decided to push the U.S. over the fiscal cliff with the "Cloward & Piven" strategy (who he studied under at Columbia).

Stop being an asshat and own it. The facts are the facts.
 
I wasn't leaving anything out, he covered Obama's contribution, was incorrect on Bush's and left out Clinton and Reagan, so I was getting the complete history. And it's near 50/50.

No. Reagan and Bush added 7T, Obama alone added 7T. That's 16 years in office vs 5 years in office. I dont know what math allows you call that "50/50". But I know libs are bad at math.

Reagan, Bush and Bush added a combined 9 trillion that's a little more than half the entire ND.

History of the United States public debt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And ONE man - Barack Obama - added the other half. Grow up [MENTION=45344]Montecresto[/MENTION]. Facts are facts.

Furthermore, blaming Reagan and Bush for the entitlements that are collapsing this nation is absurd. You assholes added Social Security, Welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, Food Stamps, and more, you assholes own it.
 
Bush added $4 trillion to the debt in 8 years. Obama has added $7 trillion less than 5 years. Who "sent the debt skyrocketing"?

[MENTION=37749]Black_Label[/MENTION] could not have made a more ignorant comment which contradict his is position more than talking about "skyrocketing debt" :lol:

It took two hundred years for this country to accumulate 1 trillion in debt. In eight short years Reagan tripled it to 3 trillion. Bush 2 took office at 5 trillion and doubled it to 10 trillion. In contrast Clinton added less than 2 trillion in eight years. Stop being partisan, both parties own this debt.

It took 232 years to accumulate $10 trillion in debt. It took Obama 4 years to add nearly $7 trillion more.

It's pretty clear than one asshole decided to push the U.S. over the fiscal cliff with the "Cloward & Piven" strategy (who he studied under at Columbia).

Stop being an asshat and own it. The facts are the facts.

Your not going to catch me defending Obama. What I am pointing out is that you guys keep playing partisan with this. Will you acknowledge the GOP's documented contribution to the ND or not. Bush doubled the ND during his presidency! Do you have a condemnation for that or not. On its present course, Obama is going to double it too! How is one worse than the other. Partisans are hacks, deceitful and liars protecting their party and not America. Both of these rat bastard parties are fucking us with this, and you, your just helping your parties effort in that by excusing them and blaming the ND all on the Dem's. not very smart!
 
Last edited:
"Mr. President, I rise today to talk about America's debt problem.

The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Over the past 5 years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to $8.6 trillion. That is "trillion'' with a "T.'' That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers." - Senator Barack Obama, 2006

Debt Limit Has Been increased SEVEN times under Obama

I think that was the last thing he was 100% right about.
 
It took two hundred years for this country to accumulate 1 trillion in debt. In eight short years Reagan tripled it to 3 trillion. Bush 2 took office at 5 trillion and doubled it to 10 trillion. In contrast Clinton added less than 2 trillion in eight years. Stop being partisan, both parties own this debt.

It took 232 years to accumulate $10 trillion in debt. It took Obama 4 years to add nearly $7 trillion more.

It's pretty clear than one asshole decided to push the U.S. over the fiscal cliff with the "Cloward & Piven" strategy (who he studied under at Columbia).

Stop being an asshat and own it. The facts are the facts.

Your not going to catch me defending Obama. What I am pointing out is that you guys keep playing partisan with this. Will you acknowledge the GOP's documented contribution to the ND or not. Bush doubled the ND during his presidency! Do you have a condemnation for that or not. On its present course, Obama is going to double it too! How is one worse than the other. Partisans are hacks, deceitful and liars protecting their party and not America. Both of these rat bastard parties are fucking us with this, and you, your just helping your parties effort in that by excusing them and blaming the ND all on the Dem's. not very smart!

I have endless criticism for Bush. I have no idea why you would think otherwise without having any clue who I am.

But here's the thing Sparky - 90% of the debt is thanks to unconstitutional Dumbocrat social programs. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, etc. were fiercely opposed by Republicans. Dumbocrats rammed it down the throats of the American people despite the warnings by their opposition on the right.

Did Bush add a ton to the debt? Yes. Why? Because the U.S. budget (over $1 trillion per year) is eaten up by those unconstitutional social programs. Get rid of that shit and this nation is debt-free in only 17 years.

The Republicans have one real problem - and that is constantly caving to the idiot, radical Dumbocrats. If you want to blindly blame both parties because it makes you feel better - have at it Sparky. Give 'em hell! I prefer to examine the facts though and place the blame squarely where it belongs: Dumbocrat Socialism.
 
"Mr. President, I rise today to talk about America's debt problem.

The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Over the past 5 years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to $8.6 trillion. That is "trillion'' with a "T.'' That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers." - Senator Barack Obama, 2006

Debt Limit Has Been increased SEVEN times under Obama

Only 7? That's nothing, Reagan raised the debt ceiling 18 times.

In your radical right wing mind, that would make Reagan a monumental failure, correct? :eusa_think:

Yep, he was stupid enough to trust the commiecrats and should have vetoed much of their crap but didn't. Reagan could have been a great prisident had he actually walked his talk.
 
Poor choice of words. Hussein might be correct sometimes but he is always 100% left.

You're dead-on... I should have said Obama is CORRECT, not "right". :lol:

Then again, how many ass Dumbocrats on this board pretend that Obama is "right of center" because they think it advances their agenda? :lmao:
 
"Mr. President, I rise today to talk about America's debt problem.

The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Over the past 5 years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to $8.6 trillion. That is "trillion'' with a "T.'' That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers." - Senator Barack Obama, 2006

Debt Limit Has Been increased SEVEN times under Obama

Only 7? That's nothing, Reagan raised the debt ceiling 18 times.

In your radical right wing mind, that would make Reagan a monumental failure, correct? :eusa_think:

Yep, he was stupid enough to trust the commiecrats and should have vetoed much of their crap but didn't. Reagan could have been a great prisident had he actually walked his talk.

Reagan was a great president. One of the two greatest ever. In case you haven't realized, there will never be a flawless president. But Reagan was as great as they get.
 
It took 232 years to accumulate $10 trillion in debt. It took Obama 4 years to add nearly $7 trillion more.

It's pretty clear than one asshole decided to push the U.S. over the fiscal cliff with the "Cloward & Piven" strategy (who he studied under at Columbia).

Stop being an asshat and own it. The facts are the facts.

Your not going to catch me defending Obama. What I am pointing out is that you guys keep playing partisan with this. Will you acknowledge the GOP's documented contribution to the ND or not. Bush doubled the ND during his presidency! Do you have a condemnation for that or not. On its present course, Obama is going to double it too! How is one worse than the other. Partisans are hacks, deceitful and liars protecting their party and not America. Both of these rat bastard parties are fucking us with this, and you, your just helping your parties effort in that by excusing them and blaming the ND all on the Dem's. not very smart!

I have endless criticism for Bush. I have no idea why you would think otherwise without having any clue who I am.

But here's the thing Sparky - 90% of the debt is thanks to unconstitutional Dumbocrat social programs. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, etc. were fiercely opposed by Republicans. Dumbocrats rammed it down the throats of the American people despite the warnings by their opposition on the right.

Did Bush add a ton to the debt? Yes. Why? Because the U.S. budget (over $1 trillion per year) is eaten up by those unconstitutional social programs. Get rid of that shit and this nation is debt-free in only 17 years.

The Republicans have one real problem - and that is constantly caving to the idiot, radical Dumbocrats. If you want to blindly blame both parties because it makes you feel better - have at it Sparky. Give 'em hell! I prefer to examine the facts though and place the blame squarely where it belongs: Dumbocrat Socialism.

Really now? Why then do republicans gleefully accept there Medicare, Medicaid and SS benefits, because of hypocrisy. Every reasonable country has such programs in place for its citizens. Try to take them away from republicans and see how far you get. Furthermore, none of those things are responsible for our ND, that is mostly WARS! Unfunded, unnecessary wars fought on borrowed money. Sparky, you're just another stupid partisan hack that blames all of our ills on democrats. As stupid as the other ones that blame all our ills on republicans. Which keep us in the trouble we're in.
 
Last edited:
Really now? Why then do republicans gleefully accept there Medicare, Medicaid and SS benefits, because of hypocrisy.

[MENTION=45344]Montecresto[/MENTION], you have to stop your Dumbocrat talking points. They are humiliating you.

Why would I not accept those benefits when I was forced against my will to pay into them for 65 years?!? Why would I not try to recover as much of my money that was stolen from me? :cuckoo:

This libtard talking point is the most nonsensical and absurd of all libtard talking points and really illustrates the just how dumb the left really is.

There is nothing "hypocritical" about trying to recover what was yours to begin with and was then stolen from you. Let me opt out of Social Security (ie make my bank account forbidden to the government) and see how fast I burn my Social Security card.

Do you have anything else Sparky? Keep this weak libtard talking point drivel at home. You have to come at me with something a LOT more intelligent than this chief.
 

Forum List

Back
Top