Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

[P@triot]

Furthermore, none of those things are responsible for our ND, that is mostly WARS! Unfunded, unnecessary wars fought on borrowed money. Sparky, you're just another stupid partisan hack that blames all of our ills on democrats. As stupid as the other ones that blame all our ills on republicans. Which keep us in the trouble we're in.

Defense is the Constitutional responsibility of the federal government. The wars would be FULLY FUNDED if Dumbocrat socialism hadn't raided the American tax payers bank account for the past 100 years.

Our defense budget is $550 billion per year. Our entitlements cost over $1 trillion per year. This is basic math Sparky. Doesn't take a room full of Dumbocrats to figure out which one costs more and is thus is adding more to the national debt...

 

[Montecresto]

Really now? Why then do republicans gleefully accept there Medicare, Medicaid and SS benefits, because of hypocrisy.

[MENTION=45344]Montecresto[/MENTION], you have to stop your Dumbocrat talking points. They are humiliating you.

Why would I not accept those benefits when I was forced against my will to pay into them for 65 years?!? Why would I not try to recover as much of my money that was stolen from me?

This libtard talking point is the most nonsensical and absurd of all libtard talking points and really illustrates the just how dumb the left really is.

There is nothing "hypocritical" about trying to recover what was yours to begin with and was then stolen from you. Let me opt out of Social Security (ie make my bank account forbidden to the government) and see how fast I burn my Social Security card.

Do you have anything else Sparky? Keep this weak libtard talking point drivel at home. You have to come at me with something a LOT more intelligent than this chief.

I'm not a democrat. You must have missed or ignored all my criticisms of the administration. These program's have been around for 45 years and the GOP during that time has had ample opportunities to repeal any of it. The opposition to it was/is theatre. While you and others set around as partisan hacks, both parties are destroying America. But don't let me get in the way of your partisan cheerleading.

 

[Montecresto]

Furthermore, none of those things are responsible for our ND, that is mostly WARS! Unfunded, unnecessary wars fought on borrowed money. Sparky, you're just another stupid partisan hack that blames all of our ills on democrats. As stupid as the other ones that blame all our ills on republicans. Which keep us in the trouble we're in.

Defense is the Constitutional responsibility of the federal government. The wars would be FULLY FUNDED if Dumbocrat socialism hadn't raided the American tax payers bank account for the past 100 years.

Our defense budget is $550 billion per year. Our entitlements cost over $1 trillion per year. This is basic math Sparky. Doesn't take a room full of Dumbocrats to figure out which one costs more and is thus is adding more to the national debt...

DEFENCE! Yes, but we have been waging, long planned wars of offence and that is very unconstitutional. But carry on cheerleading, partisan!

 

[Montecresto]

Rott/Rot, where's sparky and chief come from? Are you a fucking moron? Oh, never mind, they just told me.

 

[P@triot]

Furthermore, none of those things are responsible for our ND, that is mostly WARS! Unfunded, unnecessary wars fought on borrowed money. Sparky, you're just another stupid partisan hack that blames all of our ills on democrats. As stupid as the other ones that blame all our ills on republicans. Which keep us in the trouble we're in.

Defense is the Constitutional responsibility of the federal government. The wars would be FULLY FUNDED if Dumbocrat socialism hadn't raided the American tax payers bank account for the past 100 years.

Our defense budget is $550 billion per year. Our entitlements cost over $1 trillion per year. This is basic math Sparky. Doesn't take a room full of Dumbocrats to figure out which one costs more and is thus is adding more to the national debt...

DEFENCE! Yes, but we have been waging, long planned wars of offence and that is very unconstitutional. But carry on cheerleading, partisan!

Anyone will tell you - "the best defense is a good offense". You can't wait until after the horses are gone to close the barn doors. It's too late then. You have to be proactive in life - especially when it comes to national security. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a naïve child.

 

[P@triot]

Really now? Why then do republicans gleefully accept there Medicare, Medicaid and SS benefits, because of hypocrisy.

[MENTION=45344]Montecresto[/MENTION], you have to stop your Dumbocrat talking points. They are humiliating you.

Why would I not accept those benefits when I was forced against my will to pay into them for 65 years?!? Why would I not try to recover as much of my money that was stolen from me?

This libtard talking point is the most nonsensical and absurd of all libtard talking points and really illustrates the just how dumb the left really is.

There is nothing "hypocritical" about trying to recover what was yours to begin with and was then stolen from you. Let me opt out of Social Security (ie make my bank account forbidden to the government) and see how fast I burn my Social Security card.

Do you have anything else Sparky? Keep this weak libtard talking point drivel at home. You have to come at me with something a LOT more intelligent than this chief.

I'm not a democrat. You must have missed or ignored all my criticisms of the administration. These program's have been around for 45 years and the GOP during that time has had ample opportunities to repeal any of it. The opposition to it was/is theatre. While you and others set around as partisan hacks, both parties are destroying America. But don't let me get in the way of your partisan cheerleading.

I'm not a "partisan hack" chief. I have relentlessly bashed Bush, McCain, Graham, Boehner (really hate this S.O.B.), and more. I can't help the fact that you choose to comment from a place of ignorance. You don't know me, you haven't seen my posts, but that doesn't stop you from guessing

 

[P@triot]

2006 was before the recession. next.

So we're supposed to spend recklessly during a recession?

By the way hypocrite partisan hack - 2006 was also before we had reached a mind-numbing $17 trillion in debt. In fact, we had about $7 trillion or so at that time. If that was too much debt in Senator Barack Obama's mind, what is $17 trillion in his mind?

Want to try again genius?

 

[emilynghiem]

they are all frikken LIARS...

this shows how Obama back then didn't care if he hurt the country or not

NOW look at him TODAY...strutting around up there calling people names and acting a thug by REFUSING to negotiate...wailing how the sky will fall if the government is shut down

These people are EVIL

AND again his base WILL EXCUSE this from him, just like they are excusing him STEPPING ON OUR rights and costing us billions of dollars with his fascist piece of crap..ObamaCare

for them it's become, Obama and party OVER COUNTRY

I can understand when Reid sold out our Constitution for health care votes, because prostitution is "legal" in Nevada. Can't say the same for these other politicians for sale!

 

[bodecea]

they are all frikken LIARS...

this shows how Obama back then didn't care if he hurt the country or not

NOW look at him TODAY...strutting around up there calling people names and acting a thug by REFUSING to negotiate...wailing how the sky will fall if the government is shut down

These people are EVIL

AND again his base WILL EXCUSE this from him, just like they are excusing him STEPPING ON OUR rights and costing us billions of dollars with his fascist piece of crap..ObamaCare

for them it's become, Obama and party OVER COUNTRY

So....he lied when he said that 2006 was BEFORE the Recession?

 

[Warrior102]

they are all frikken LIARS...

this shows how Obama back then didn't care if he hurt the country or not

NOW look at him TODAY...strutting around up there calling people names and acting a thug by REFUSING to negotiate...wailing how the sky will fall if the government is shut down

These people are EVIL

AND again his base WILL EXCUSE this from him, just like they are excusing him STEPPING ON OUR rights and costing us billions of dollars with his fascist piece of crap..ObamaCare

for them it's become, Obama and party OVER COUNTRY

Fucking Libberhoids also support terrorists, two guys sucking each other's dicks, Iran, communism, and everything else that's WRONG in this fucking world.

 

[P@triot]

they are all frikken LIARS...

this shows how Obama back then didn't care if he hurt the country or not

NOW look at him TODAY...strutting around up there calling people names and acting a thug by REFUSING to negotiate...wailing how the sky will fall if the government is shut down

These people are EVIL

AND again his base WILL EXCUSE this from him, just like they are excusing him STEPPING ON OUR rights and costing us billions of dollars with his fascist piece of crap..ObamaCare

for them it's become, Obama and party OVER COUNTRY

So....he lied when he said that 2006 was BEFORE the Recession?

What does the recession have to do with raising the debt ceiling? It's your position that during a recession, when the government has less revenue than ever because there are less working people to tax than ever, the federal government should increase spending?!?

What is more telling is that Obama said our debt at $7 trillion was "irresponsible", "unpatriotic", and a "failure of leadership" - and that was $10 trillion BEFORE we hit the $17 trillion we're currently at.

Want to try again little ignorant [MENTION=20112]bodecea[/MENTION]?

 

[Hoffstra]

Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

strawmen are funny.

 

[P@triot]

Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

strawmen are funny.

What's really funny is that when Dumbocrats lose a debate based on facts, they falsely accuse the debate of being "strawman" or the debater as being "racist".

Can you please describe what was "strawman" about my post? It took Barack Obama's exact words and applied it to the exact issue (raising the national debt) which he was referring to in his words.

It's funny watching you guys panic when you've been owned with facts [MENTION=44947]Hoffstra[/MENTION]

 

[bodecea]

Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

strawmen are funny.

Aren't they tho?

 

[007]

2006 was before the recession. next.

Yea, and the recession could have been over a long time ago 'cept the Prez thinks it's his way or the Highway. If not he pitches temper tantrums, he's such a big boy.

Your Prez spoke, he nailed the situation. Why won't you listen to him??

 

[emilynghiem]

Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

strawmen are funny.

What's really funny is that when Dumbocrats lose a debate based on facts, they falsely accuse the debate of being "strawman" or the debater as being "racist".

Can you please describe what was "strawman" about my post? It took Barack Obama's exact words and applied it to the exact issue (raising the national debt) which he was referring to in his words.

It's funny watching you guys panic when you've been owned with facts [MENTION=44947]Hoffstra[/MENTION]

Hi Rottweiler: I have yet to see party leaders on any side talk about paying taxpayers back for past misspending or abuses, but only blame each other for spending more of future taxes.

So unless they talk about holding the actual govt leaders and corporations responsible for where our money had gone all this time that got us over our heads in debt, and talk about paying it back over time, then ALL these arguments are distractions from real solutions.

I wouldn't necessarily call it a strawman. more like using each other as whipping boys.

You take a statement, and use that to whip or slap someone around with it.

And it does nothing to solve the real problem of why can't we hold people responsible
for paying back money they abused their govt or corporate positions to spend
that we can show weren't lawful or Constitutional, but unethical conflicts of interest
and/or weren't the most effective and efficient means to achieve tasks,
and thus VIOLATED the Code of Ethics for Govt Service for federal govt:
ethics-commission.net

We need to start holding the specific parties responsible who spent our tax money,
set up federal reserve accounts to lend against this debt and charge it to the wrongdoers not to us,
while using those credits to pay for the work and create jobs FIXING whatever was neglected or broken
while the money went into pockets of private interests, conflicting contractors, or campaign contributors or whatever it went.

We have enough lawyers and lawschools in the country furious with both parties,
we can surely form teams to go after all of them, pay law students/interns on commission
to collect millions in paybacks on our behalf as defrauded/abused taxpayers forced into slavery to work for govt,
and not submit to the insanity of paying any more taxes if our money we already spent could have paid to fix the problems already.
why keep charging us more for these mistakes they haven't even paid us back from the past, thinking they are immune or can't be held accountable?

They can be if we treat them like employees that work for us.
Either fix the problem or we will hire people to fix it and charge it back to you for how much you owe us.
Period.

Not taking lame statements out of context here and there,
and blame this person or that party, back and forth which does nothing.

 

[emilynghiem]

[MENTION=45344]Montecresto[/MENTION], you have to stop your Dumbocrat talking points. They are humiliating you.

Why would I not accept those benefits when I was forced against my will to pay into them for 65 years?!? Why would I not try to recover as much of my money that was stolen from me?

This libtard talking point is the most nonsensical and absurd of all libtard talking points and really illustrates the just how dumb the left really is.

There is nothing "hypocritical" about trying to recover what was yours to begin with and was then stolen from you. Let me opt out of Social Security (ie make my bank account forbidden to the government) and see how fast I burn my Social Security card.

Do you have anything else Sparky? Keep this weak libtard talking point drivel at home. You have to come at me with something a LOT more intelligent than this chief.

I'm not a democrat. You must have missed or ignored all my criticisms of the administration. These program's have been around for 45 years and the GOP during that time has had ample opportunities to repeal any of it. The opposition to it was/is theatre. While you and others set around as partisan hacks, both parties are destroying America. But don't let me get in the way of your partisan cheerleading.

I'm not a "partisan hack" chief. I have relentlessly bashed Bush, McCain, Graham, Boehner (really hate this S.O.B.), and more. I can't help the fact that you choose to comment from a place of ignorance. You don't know me, you haven't seen my posts, but that doesn't stop you from guessing

Maybe that is another reason I align with you Rottweiler.

I'm a Democrat and can barely find any, maybe John Cusack
who will stand up at all. I go after addressing problems within the party
as a peer with focus on Constitutional integrity. So you can imagine
how outraged I am all the time at this craziness going on.
This is going to take a lot more work, and I thought I was stretched to the limit already.

The concept of setting up and running this whole health care thing
within the party supporters with "voluntary participation" is just foreign to people.
but that is the only constitutional way and most effective way to do it anyway.
it would guarantee prochoice people only pay for those policies
and prolife people run their own programs under theirs. so everyone would be
equally protected and represented. so this "party of inclusion" had better get it going!
not excluding and penalizing half the nation and then claiming diversity. what????

 

[JakeStarkey]

Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

I doubt the OP, but I do notice that Rott has never been able to carry an argument against his Dear Leader.

 

[emilynghiem]

Barack Obama is 100% right and NOBODY can dispute otherwise

I doubt the OP, but I do notice that Rott has never been able to carry an argument against his Dear Leader.

The saddest thing is he doesn't need to try. Obama has no problem defeating himself without any outside help required. Rottweiler is venting grief and steam over things that are already failed conflicts. Victoria Jackson also wept for America when Obama got re-elected. Nothing we can say is going to fix this. The work it WILL take requires resolving all this grief first if we are going to work together effectively. It will take the entire nation if not the world collaborating on solutions since we can't afford these problems. If America cannot even stand united yet, we need to get through this first, before we can lead the world to fix these same problems plaguing every country and sector of the economy.

Jake I hope you can reach out and learn to have more compassion for those who are deeply aggrieved right now. It's going to take all of us putting our best ideas to work to fix this country and world economy.