Osomir
VIP Member
- Jun 4, 2013
- 2,830
- 164
That's true, and hopefully you said the same at the time.
The big danger is that bombing often leads to ground troops being employed. I didn't agree that there would be any valid benefit for Bush putting ground troops in, and the same would be true for Obama.
There was one strike under Bush via drones that was just horrible and based on terrible intel. We hit a shcool and killed a bunch of children (something like just over 50). I know we can't be perfect, but that to me is a pretty big intel lapse and the worst error in drone strikes to date. Other than that though I haven't been horribly critical of Bush's drone policies.
What I did disapprove of was his rather poor foriegn policy. His invasion of Iraq was a terrible idea, really one of the worst foreign policy blunders of the 21st century. I also disagreed with his bombing strikes in Somalia due to the administrations coupling of Al Qaeda with the ICU. I thought that was rather off the mark and that Al Shabaab was greatly strengthened by our bombing of the ICU and support for the Ethiopian invasion. We've never been good with Somalia though. For some reason we always try to oversimplify it and ignore clan politics.
As far as larger drone policy is concerned, I also tend to shy away from targeting militant funerals and away from targeting those helping drone strike victims.
Last edited: