BBC calls out settlers for their "terrorism"

[docmauser1]

BBC is not a right wing organization by any stretch of the imagination.

Left-wing crapologetic, then?

 

[JStone]

resistance to occupation

terrorists!

Exactly. Thats what my thread is about, the terrorist settlers in the "occupied" west bank & east jerusalum Do you know what 'occupied" means?

Douche, you got pwned. Go to mommy like I told you.

Eugene Rostow, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank...

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[Dot Com]

Here's the clincher voiced by an israeli General:
BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

Brigadier General Alon said not enough had been done to tackle Jewish extremism referring to price tag attacks as "terror".

"These acts not only should be condemned for their folly and wrongdoing but we should also have done more to prevent them and to arrest the perpetrators," he said in his outgoing speech.

how many threads have you done about atrocities committed against israelis.

i'm not big on the settlements, but if they really wanted them to go away, they'd make a deal. no other country on the planet unilaterally gives in to people who lob missiles at them.

i'll be looking for your threads pointing out what the hamas and hezbollah terrorists do.

I can always count on jillian, the liberal, "pro-occupation" poster. I'm a liberal but I support International Law which the settlers are in violation of. You ever heard of J Street jillian? They are an organization that isa reasonable/rational alternative to A1PAC. You should look into them. A1PAC, which all U.S. Presidential candidates have had to grovel to in the elections.

It's a battle Dot Com. Two sides fight this battle and you sound like you just want the Jews to move back and await an attack. Oh, and give their protection away as well.

From the BBC article:

Brigadier General Alon said not enough had been done to tackle Jewish extremism referring to price tag attacks as "terror".

 

[docmauser1]

Resistance to occupation

How so, if they pursue their occupation?

 

[destroythedome]

BBC is not a right wing organization by any stretch of the imagination. They also said that the settlers were in violation of International Law.

BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

'Shameful' inaction
The United Nations says the number of attacks by extremist Jewish settlers on Palestinians resulting in either injury or damage to property has roughly tripled since 2009.

The UN says in 90% of complaints filed to the Israeli police by Palestinians against settlers, nobody is ever indicted.

In October, an Israeli army patrol was surrounded and assaulted by a group of extremist settlers in the West Bank.

Extremist settlers have set fire to West Bank mosques and daubed their walls with graffiti
The attack on the soldiers came after a Jewish teenager was arrested on suspicion of carrying out an arson attack on a Palestinian mosque.

The facts are the facts.

Yes facts are facts; the bigest is there are criminals in every society in the world. the difference is if a jew commits a crime againts palestinians and the police can catcth them they are prosecuted.As witnessed by your post,even to the point of risking harm to their soldiers to bring the punk to justice.( the whole 90% I think is a little high in my opinion due to UN propaganda but I may be wrong) In any case it beats the 100% of palestinian terrorists who are not arrestd by hamas the so called government of the palestinians. Not only does hamas show 0 interest in catching criminals commiting crimes against Israelis they openly encourage it.
SO THANK YOU For the post showing why the Israeli is so much better than the palestinian.

And yes I know what occupied means. It means you were too weak and unorganized (probably because you were to busy fighting amongst yourselves) and you got your asses whiped and now you want to cry about it. (gee that should be in websters)

 

[Dot Com]

terrorists!

Exactly. Thats what my thread is about, the terrorist settlers in the "occupied" west bank & east jerusalum Do you know what 'occupied" means?

Douche, you got pwned. Go to mommy like I told you.

How many times do you have to spam the same propoganda spamboi? Whats w/ the potty mouth too? Why do so many z10nists/hgasbara posters on the interwebs have potty mouths?

 

[JStone]

Exactly. Thats what my thread is about, the terrorist settlers in the "occupied" west bank & east jerusalum Do you know what 'occupied" means?

Douche, you got pwned. Go to mommy like I told you.

How many times do you have to spam the same propoganda spamboi? Whats w/ the potty mouth too? Why do so many z10nists/hgasbara posters on the interwebs have potty mouths?

A mental midget like you cannot grasp the viewpoint of a world renowned legal scholar. I'm tired of spanking you so go to mommy, stupid little boy.

Eugene Rostow, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[docmauser1]

I'm a liberal but I support International Law which the settlers are in violation of.

What might that "international law" be?

 

[Jos]

I'm a liberal but I support International Law which the settlers are in violation of.

What might that "international law" be?

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980[5] and the Golan Heights in 1981[6] has not been recognised by any other country.[7][8] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, that territory ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the some countries and various human rights organizations

The significance of the designation of these territories as occupied territory is that certain legal obligations fall on the occupying power under international law. Under international law there are certain laws of war governing military occupation, including the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and the Fourth Geneva Convention.[12] One of those obligations is to maintain the status quo until the signing of a peace treaty, the resolution of specific conditions outlined in a peace treaty, or the formation of a new civilian government.[13]

There is a dispute as to whether, and if so to what extent, Israel is an occupying power in relation to the Palestinian territories.

There is also a dispute as to whether Israeli settlements in these territories are in breach of Israel's obligations as an occupying power and constitute a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and whether the settlements constitute war crimes

Israeli-occupied territories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[JStone]

I'm a liberal but I support International Law which the settlers are in violation of.

What might that "international law" be?

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980[5] and the Golan Heights in 1981[6] has not been recognised by any other country.[7][8] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, that territory ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the some countries and various human rights organizations

The significance of the designation of these territories as occupied territory is that certain legal obligations fall on the occupying power under international law. Under international law there are certain laws of war governing military occupation, including the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and the Fourth Geneva Convention.[12] One of those obligations is to maintain the status quo until the signing of a peace treaty, the resolution of specific conditions outlined in a peace treaty, or the formation of a new civilian government.[13]

There is a dispute as to whether, and if so to what extent, Israel is an occupying power in relation to the Palestinian territories.

There is also a dispute as to whether Israeli settlements in these territories are in breach of Israel's obligations as an occupying power and constitute a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and whether the settlements constitute war crimes

Israeli-occupied territories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Puta, wikipedia not a legal authority. No wonder spain is bankrupt

Read, learn puta...

Eugene Rostow, Legal scholar, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_V._Rostow

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[Jos]

Wikipedia not a legal authority

sic
Wikipedia is an on-line encyclopedia that gives links to the law

 

[JStone]

Wikipedia not a legal authority

sic
Wikipedia is an on-line encyclopedia that gives links to the law

Puta, a monkey like you can write in wiki. Go blow some touristas, puta.

Eugene Rostow was a legal authority, puta.

Yale Law School http://www.law.yale.edu/news/4437.htm

Eugene V. Rostow '37: Dean, Scholar, Statesman

Sterling Professor Emeritus of Law and Public Affairs Eugene V. Rostow, a former dean of Yale Law School and an influential scholar and government official, died on November 25, 2002, at age 89.

Born in Brooklyn, New York, and raised in New Haven, Rostow attended Yale, graduating Phi Beta Kappa at age 19, and then studied economics at Kings College, Oxford. He then returned to the United States and to Yale, graduating from the Yale Law School in 1937.

After a stint at a New York law firm, Rostow joined the Yale Law School faculty in 1938 and became a full professor in 1944. During World War II, he served in the Lend Lease Administration, overseeing the provision of supplies to American allies.

He was an early critic of the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II and, especially, of the Supreme Court decisions that validated the policy. His 1945 article in the Yale Law Journal criticizing those decisions became a foundational part of the movement to provide restitution to interned Japanese Americans

Rostow became dean of Yale Law School in 1955 and served until 1965. He oversaw a program to revamp the Law School's curriculum, bringing a more interdisciplinary approach to the study of law, as well as increasing the number of seminars and the opportunities for independent study. He also built up the school's endowment and recruited highly respected legal scholars to the faculty.

Current Yale Law School Dean Anthony T. Kronman said, "Much of the Yale Law School we now know--to which we have become so accustomed by the passage of time--was built or rebuilt during Gene's deanship years. Gene's intellect, will, and character were molding forces in the evolution of the modern Yale Law School, and his legacy is all about us. Gene Rostow was one of the Law School's great deans."

After his time in the deanship, Rostow again entered government service as undersecretary for political affairs from 1966 to 1969. He was the third-highest ranking official in Lyndon Johnson's State Department and became well known for his defense of America's policy in Vietnam. He firmly believed that the U.S. had treaty obligations to defend South Vietnam and a moral obligation to oppose the spread of communism. He also helped draft a crucial UN Security Council resolution on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Returning to Yale Law School, Rostow was an expert on international security and disarmament. He wrote in the New York Times in 1969 that "a balance of power is the only possible foundation for peace." He advocated building up America's defense forces and was a founding member of the Committee on the Present Danger.

In 1981, he was appointed by President Ronald Reagan to direct the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, making him the highest-ranking Democrat in the Reagan administration.

He became Sterling Professor Emeritus in 1984. His many books included Sovereign Prerogative, 1962; Law, Power and the Pursuit of Peace, 1968; The Ideal in Law, 1978; and Toward Managed Peace, 1993.

 

[Dot Com]

BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

Settlements are illegal under international law although Israel disputes this.

This month, the Israeli Education Minister, Gideon Saar, strongly condemned the "price tag" policy conducted by extremist settlers.

"The price tag gangs that harass innocent people, damage property, attack Israeli soldiers and security forces, burn mosques and terrorise political opponents are a violent and dangerous cancerous growth that must be uprooted," he said.

 

[California Girl]

BBC is not a right wing organization by any stretch of the imagination. They also said that the settlers were in violation of International Law.

BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

'Shameful' inaction
The United Nations says the number of attacks by extremist Jewish settlers on Palestinians resulting in either injury or damage to property has roughly tripled since 2009.

The UN says in 90% of complaints filed to the Israeli police by Palestinians against settlers, nobody is ever indicted.

In October, an Israeli army patrol was surrounded and assaulted by a group of extremist settlers in the West Bank.

Extremist settlers have set fire to West Bank mosques and daubed their walls with graffiti
The attack on the soldiers came after a Jewish teenager was arrested on suspicion of carrying out an arson attack on a Palestinian mosque.

The facts are the facts.

The BBC leans left. However, unlike our media, they tend to report and not opine in their reporting.

You're a fucking idiot if you think the BBC is 'calling out settlers'. The BBC does not 'call out', it reports.

Moron.

 

[JStone]

BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

Settlements are illegal under international law although Israel disputes this.

This month, the Israeli Education Minister, Gideon Saar, strongly condemned the "price tag" policy conducted by extremist settlers.

"The price tag gangs that harass innocent people, damage property, attack Israeli soldiers and security forces, burn mosques and terrorise political opponents are a violent and dangerous cancerous growth that must be uprooted," he said.

Douche, you were pwned 20 posts ago. Run to mommy.

Eugene Rostow, Legal scholar, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank... Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[California Girl]

BBC is not a right wing organization by any stretch of the imagination. They also said that the settlers were in violation of International Law.

BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

'Shameful' inaction
The United Nations says the number of attacks by extremist Jewish settlers on Palestinians resulting in either injury or damage to property has roughly tripled since 2009.

The UN says in 90% of complaints filed to the Israeli police by Palestinians against settlers, nobody is ever indicted.

In October, an Israeli army patrol was surrounded and assaulted by a group of extremist settlers in the West Bank.

Extremist settlers have set fire to West Bank mosques and daubed their walls with graffiti
The attack on the soldiers came after a Jewish teenager was arrested on suspicion of carrying out an arson attack on a Palestinian mosque.

The facts are the facts.

Oh.... and.... to be factually accurate (instead of making shit up like you do....) about the international law.... it says:

Settlements are illegal under international law although Israel disputes this.

Many settlers believe they have a religious right to the land.

What you see as 'calling out', normal, rational people see as a fair and accurate piece of reporting.... in which the BBC does not take a side.

Fucking idiot.

 

[Jos]

Rostow was born on 25 August 1913 in Brooklyn, New York, a grandson of poor Jewish immigrants from the Russian Empire

Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[JStone]

BBC is not a right wing organization by any stretch of the imagination. They also said that the settlers were in violation of International Law.

BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

'Shameful' inaction
The United Nations says the number of attacks by extremist Jewish settlers on Palestinians resulting in either injury or damage to property has roughly tripled since 2009.

The UN says in 90% of complaints filed to the Israeli police by Palestinians against settlers, nobody is ever indicted.

In October, an Israeli army patrol was surrounded and assaulted by a group of extremist settlers in the West Bank.

Extremist settlers have set fire to West Bank mosques and daubed their walls with graffiti
The attack on the soldiers came after a Jewish teenager was arrested on suspicion of carrying out an arson attack on a Palestinian mosque.

The facts are the facts.

The BBC leans left. However, unlike our media, they tend to report and not opine in their reporting.

You're a fucking idiot if you think the BBC is 'calling out settlers'. The BBC does not 'call out', it reports.

Moron.

Has the BBC called out Britain's occupation of northern Ireland, shit-for-brains?

Has the BBC reported on the bloody history of the British Empire that stole 25 percent of the world's land and occupied 400 million people?

 

[Ropey]

Here's the clincher voiced by an israeli General:
BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

how many threads have you done about atrocities committed against israelis.

i'm not big on the settlements, but if they really wanted them to go away, they'd make a deal. no other country on the planet unilaterally gives in to people who lob missiles at them.

i'll be looking for your threads pointing out what the hamas and hezbollah terrorists do.

I can always count on jillian, the liberal, "pro-occupation" poster. I'm a liberal but I support International Law which the settlers are in violation of. You ever heard of J Street jillian? They are an organization that isa reasonable/rational alternative to A1PAC. You should look into them. A1PAC, which all U.S. Presidential candidates have had to grovel to in the elections.

It's a battle Dot Com. Two sides fight this battle and you sound like you just want the Jews to move back and await an attack. Oh, and give their protection away as well.

From the BBC article:

Brigadier General Alon said not enough had been done to tackle Jewish extremism referring to price tag attacks as "terror".

I said two sides. You move back to one side Dot.com.

Fail...

 

[California Girl]

BBC is not a right wing organization by any stretch of the imagination. They also said that the settlers were in violation of International Law.

BBC News - Concerns over rising settler violence in the West Bank

The facts are the facts.

The BBC leans left. However, unlike our media, they tend to report and not opine in their reporting.

You're a fucking idiot if you think the BBC is 'calling out settlers'. The BBC does not 'call out', it reports.

Moron.

Has the BBC called out Britain's occupation of northern Ireland, shit-for-brains?

Are you mentally deficient? Or just an ignorant twit?