Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Depends on how we define money maker if we're talking summer blockbuster type money few if any do if it's a few million over what it cost to make some do. As I said it also depends on the story as well as the stars million dollar baby which won best picture and stared Clint Eastwood, Hillary Swank, and Morgan Freeman had far better odds of becoming a money maker than most.I don't know for sure. Which Oscar winner for best picture of the year did not become a money maker?Some do depends on the story.They become big money makers after they win.Oscar best picture nominees usually aren't big money makers.
Only time I spend money at a movie theater is when I take the kid to see a blockbuster cartoon movie or well advertised one that she has seen advertised on TV. Otherwise, I'm a free movie on the TV person.Depends on how we define money maker if we're talking summer blockbuster type money few if any do if it's a few million over what it cost to make some do. As I said it also depends on the story as well as the stars million dollar baby which won best picture and stared Clint Eastwood, Hillary Swank, and Morgan Freeman had far better odds of becoming a money maker than most.I don't know for sure. Which Oscar winner for best picture of the year did not become a money maker?Some do depends on the story.They become big money makers after they win.Oscar best picture nominees usually aren't big money makers.
It wasn't a flop, it just never had a major release, it was a sleeper. I personally passed on it, because if I wanted to see a bunch of gay black men, I'd visit AtlantaIMDB says it cost $5 million and grossed $20 mill so it made money but a $20M gross is lousy. Why did it win? More black privilege and pervert privilege AKA affirmative action.
Moonlight (2016) - IMDb
I agree and I still don't like your assThey're just making up for all of the bitching about no black awards last year.
Duh.
affrimative action PC fucking BFSIMDB says it cost $5 million and grossed $20 mill so it made money but a $20M gross is lousy. Why did it win? More black privilege and pervert privilege AKA affirmative action.
Moonlight (2016) - IMDb
I was being sarcastic but accurate.I agree and I still don't like your assThey're just making up for all of the bitching about no black awards last year.
Duh.
That's pretty much where I am when we are now getting sequels to flops it's time to stay home. I have to admit I do like the dine in theaters.Only time I spend money at a movie theater is when I take the kid to see a blockbuster cartoon movie or well advertised one that she has seen advertised on TV. Otherwise, I'm a free movie on the TV person.Depends on how we define money maker if we're talking summer blockbuster type money few if any do if it's a few million over what it cost to make some do. As I said it also depends on the story as well as the stars million dollar baby which won best picture and stared Clint Eastwood, Hillary Swank, and Morgan Freeman had far better odds of becoming a money maker than most.I don't know for sure. Which Oscar winner for best picture of the year did not become a money maker?Some do depends on the story.They become big money makers after they win.Oscar best picture nominees usually aren't big money makers.
IMDB says it cost $5 million and grossed $20 mill so it made money but a $20M gross is lousy. Why did it win? More black privilege and pervert privilege AKA affirmative action.
Moonlight (2016) - IMDb
You do realize that such a suggestion is not a one way street, right? The camp that you cheer for could get their own show too if they are going to choose to be so different from how the show started out originally.Perhaps you guys should get your own show and come up with a redneck peckerwood's awards trophy.How much a film costs or profits is not the basis for being awarded an Oscar.
It's not THE basis but it's a big factor. But not here. The libs had to give the oscar to a movie about black fags no matter what. THINK
What was it about?IMDB says it cost $5 million and grossed $20 mill so it made money but a $20M gross is lousy. Why did it win? More black privilege and pervert privilege AKA affirmative action.
Moonlight (2016) - IMDb
I boycotted the Oscar television program. And I hope millions of others did as well. We're The ratings low for the evening?
How much a film costs or profits is not the basis for being awarded an Oscar.
It's not THE basis but it's a big factor. But not here. The libs had to give the oscar to a movie about black fags no matter what. THINK
