Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2011
- 101,230
- 46,212
- Thread starter
- #21
Much like apple initially fought the government it makes me happy. PeriodActually, whether ultimately right or wrong, Twitter’s objections were to the non disclosure order more than they were to the disclosure order itself. Twitter argues that it has a first amendment right to speak to its own customers and that the non disclosure order amounted to a prior restraint on free speech.
It did delay production even thereafter apparently because it couldn’t aggregate all of the Trump posts swiftly enough.
They hadn’t argued in time that the penalty formula was improper.
The government’s worries about the former President possibly destroying evidence if alerted to the warrant prematurely seems to assume that he would behave like Shrillary Clinton. I can’t explain why the 3 judges bought that nonsense.
We're inching closer and closer to a permanent police state and every little thing that slows that snowball has my approval