CDZ Biology Deniers

[P@triot]

The left continues to deny basic science/biology. And it’s driving away the few remaining rational leftists.

'It's nonsense': Piers Morgan blasts policy replacing 'breastfeeding' with 'chestfeeding' in transgender-inclusive effort at UK hospital | Blaze Media

'This kind of PC-cop nonsense with the language ... it annoys people ... it doesn't bring you any inclusivity. It becomes exclusive; it alienates people.'

www.theblaze.com

 

[Concerned American]

1) the term settled science is an oxymoron. Gravity is observable and measurable but why and how it works is still to some degree unknown therefore it is not settled science. Climate change was disproven in 1961 by Lorenz working in the MIT meterological Department.
2) Horse breeders and women act on the assumption that the female mammal provides @60% of offspring inheritance.
3) Crick and Wallace both reached the conclusion that evolution was bunk. Richard Dawkins has reportedly gone the same way.

You are not being wiley Coyote

Climate change is not "disproven" - 1961 is 55 years ago.
Evolution is "bunk"? Specifically by what evidence? Are Crick, Wallace and Dawkins now stating there is a diety involved?

Hope you know more about "science" than you do math--1961-2021 is 60 years my dear.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Based on what we know, Intelligent design is as likely as pure Evolution. Most laypeople think evolution is some settled science. It has blistering holes that cannot be explained.

I'm fine with using the theory as a basis. It's exactly what Intelligent design does. However, explaining the holes is where the difference comes in. Most of the anti-Christian/Catholic, athiest folk take any notion of suggestion of a design entirely personally, but then fail to address just how flimsy their supposed ironclad theory is. Nobody should be walking around with any swagger. We don't know.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You mean like Intelligent Design?

Yes...that's another good example. Their denial of "Intelligent Design" as well.

Is that like denying that the Golden Ratio exists?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

1) the term settled science is an oxymoron. Gravity is observable and measurable but why and how it works is still to some degree unknown therefore it is not settled science. Climate change was disproven in 1961 by Lorenz working in the MIT meterological Department.
2) Horse breeders and women act on the assumption that the female mammal provides @60% of offspring inheritance.
3) Crick and Wallace both reached the conclusion that evolution was bunk. Richard Dawkins has reportedly gone the same way.

You are not being wiley Coyote

Climate change is not "disproven" - 1961 is 55 years ago.
Evolution is "bunk"? Specifically by what evidence? Are Crick, Wallace and Dawkins now stating there is a diety involved?

Climate change is bunk simply because no climate has changed. There are seven climate zones. Which one has changed or is changing? It doesn't have to be disproven simply because it was never proven in the first place.