blackhawk
Diamond Member
Has anyone wondered why Stevens might have gone with using Libyans for security? Do you think it might have been because the administration had a no boots on the ground policy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has anyone wondered why Stevens might have gone with using Libyans for security? Do you think it might have been because the administration had a no boots on the ground policy?
Has anyone changed the opinions which they formed about Benghazi before any facts were known?
Didn't think so.
Whoever gets to the blank slate that is a rube's mind first has all the advantage. No amount of contrary evidence to what the puppet masters write will do anything to reverse them, much less teach them not to swallow whatever piss is poured for them in the absence of factual information.
You are going to see what you want to see in any "report".
[MENTION=36422]blackhawk[/MENTION]Has anyone wondered why Stevens might have gone with using Libyans for security? Do you think it might have been because the administration had a no boots on the ground policy?
Idiot! It's well known Stevens went 'native' and thought he was winning the hearts and minds of the Libyans. He forgot Libya contained far too many factions and loyalties...he trusted too much....remember "Trust but verify"
[MENTION=36422]blackhawk[/MENTION]Has anyone wondered why Stevens might have gone with using Libyans for security? Do you think it might have been because the administration had a no boots on the ground policy?
Idiot! It's well known Stevens went 'native' and thought he was winning the hearts and minds of the Libyans. He forgot Libya contained far too many factions and loyalties...he trusted too much....remember "Trust but verify"
You really didn't address my point the Obama administration had a no boots on the ground light foot print policy towards Libya so again what choice did Stevens have other than to go native as you put it?