Boycott Israel

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers: New Orleans City Council refuses to single out Israel. BDS fail

 

[Roudy]

BDS got flushed down the toilet a while back. Anybody promoting this piece of shit terrorist sponsored organization is blowing smoke out of his or her ass.

S.720 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Israel Anti-Boycott Act

Introduced in Senate (03/23/2017)
Israel Anti-Boycott Act

This bill declares that Congress: (1) opposes the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution of March 24, 2016, which urges countries to pressure companies to divest from, or break contracts with, Israel; and (2) encourages full implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 through enhanced, governmentwide, coordinated U.S.-Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas.

The bill amends the Export Administration Act of 1979 to declare that it shall be U.S. policy to oppose:

• requests by foreign countries to impose restrictive practices or boycotts against other countries friendly to the United States or against U.S. persons; and
• restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by an international governmental organization, or requests to impose such practices or boycotts, against Israel.

The bill prohibits any U.S. person engaged interstate or foreign commerce from supporting:

• any request by a foreign country to impose any boycott against a country that is friendly to the United States and that is not itself the object of any form of boycott pursuant to United States law or regulation, or
• any boycott fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or any request by any international governmental organization to impose such a boycott.

The bill amends the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to include as a reason for the Export-Import Bank to deny credit applications for the export of goods and services between the United States and foreign countries, opposition to policies and actions that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with citizens or residents of Israel, entities organized under the laws of Israel, or the government of Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

BDS got flushed down the toilet a while back. Anybody promoting this piece of shit terrorist sponsored organization is blowing smoke out of his or her ass.

S.720 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Israel Anti-Boycott Act

Introduced in Senate (03/23/2017)
Israel Anti-Boycott Act

This bill declares that Congress: (1) opposes the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution of March 24, 2016, which urges countries to pressure companies to divest from, or break contracts with, Israel; and (2) encourages full implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 through enhanced, governmentwide, coordinated U.S.-Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas.

The bill amends the Export Administration Act of 1979 to declare that it shall be U.S. policy to oppose:

• requests by foreign countries to impose restrictive practices or boycotts against other countries friendly to the United States or against U.S. persons; and
• restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by an international governmental organization, or requests to impose such practices or boycotts, against Israel.

The bill prohibits any U.S. person engaged interstate or foreign commerce from supporting:

• any request by a foreign country to impose any boycott against a country that is friendly to the United States and that is not itself the object of any form of boycott pursuant to United States law or regulation, or
• any boycott fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or any request by any international governmental organization to impose such a boycott.

The bill amends the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to include as a reason for the Export-Import Bank to deny credit applications for the export of goods and services between the United States and foreign countries, opposition to policies and actions that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with citizens or residents of Israel, entities organized under the laws of Israel, or the government of Israel.

So, what difference does it make?

 

[Hollie]

BDS got flushed down the toilet a while back. Anybody promoting this piece of shit terrorist sponsored organization is blowing smoke out of his or her ass.

S.720 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Israel Anti-Boycott Act

Introduced in Senate (03/23/2017)
Israel Anti-Boycott Act

This bill declares that Congress: (1) opposes the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution of March 24, 2016, which urges countries to pressure companies to divest from, or break contracts with, Israel; and (2) encourages full implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 through enhanced, governmentwide, coordinated U.S.-Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas.

The bill amends the Export Administration Act of 1979 to declare that it shall be U.S. policy to oppose:

• requests by foreign countries to impose restrictive practices or boycotts against other countries friendly to the United States or against U.S. persons; and
• restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by an international governmental organization, or requests to impose such practices or boycotts, against Israel.

The bill prohibits any U.S. person engaged interstate or foreign commerce from supporting:

• any request by a foreign country to impose any boycott against a country that is friendly to the United States and that is not itself the object of any form of boycott pursuant to United States law or regulation, or
• any boycott fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or any request by any international governmental organization to impose such a boycott.

The bill amends the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to include as a reason for the Export-Import Bank to deny credit applications for the export of goods and services between the United States and foreign countries, opposition to policies and actions that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with citizens or residents of Israel, entities organized under the laws of Israel, or the government of Israel.

So, what difference does it make?

It makes your enraged to see the BDS groupies lose, lose and lose again. That's the difference.

Peddle your hatreds elsewhere.

 

[Hollie]

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

“Too often, the UN is exploited as a vehicle for targeting Israel,” the letter states, adding that the anti-Israel “actions have at times reinforced the broader scourge of anti-Semitism and distracted certain UN entities from their original missions.”



Among the suggestions made to change direction was a stop to the denial by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) of the Christian and Jewish ties to Jerusalem. “UNESCO member states must be made to realize that these actions only undermine the credibility of the organization.”

Other issues requiring change, according to the letter, are the role of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), which perpetuates anti-Israel bias and actions; the funding of committees that “serve no purpose other than to attack Israel and to inspire the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement;” and, “most troubling,” the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which includes some of the world’s worst violators of human rights and whose “obsession with” Israel “makes a mockery” of the Council.

 

[P F Tinmore]

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

“Too often, the UN is exploited as a vehicle for targeting Israel,” the letter states, adding that the anti-Israel “actions have at times reinforced the broader scourge of anti-Semitism and distracted certain UN entities from their original missions.”



Among the suggestions made to change direction was a stop to the denial by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) of the Christian and Jewish ties to Jerusalem. “UNESCO member states must be made to realize that these actions only undermine the credibility of the organization.”

Other issues requiring change, according to the letter, are the role of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), which perpetuates anti-Israel bias and actions; the funding of committees that “serve no purpose other than to attack Israel and to inspire the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement;” and, “most troubling,” the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which includes some of the world’s worst violators of human rights and whose “obsession with” Israel “makes a mockery” of the Council.

More sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization.

 

[Roudy]

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

“Too often, the UN is exploited as a vehicle for targeting Israel,” the letter states, adding that the anti-Israel “actions have at times reinforced the broader scourge of anti-Semitism and distracted certain UN entities from their original missions.”



Among the suggestions made to change direction was a stop to the denial by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) of the Christian and Jewish ties to Jerusalem. “UNESCO member states must be made to realize that these actions only undermine the credibility of the organization.”

Other issues requiring change, according to the letter, are the role of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), which perpetuates anti-Israel bias and actions; the funding of committees that “serve no purpose other than to attack Israel and to inspire the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement;” and, “most troubling,” the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which includes some of the world’s worst violators of human rights and whose “obsession with” Israel “makes a mockery” of the Council.

More sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization.

Sour grapes?! Ha ha ha ho ho ho! It's you guys that have suffered one major setback after another, shriveled grapes.

 

[Hollie]

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

“Too often, the UN is exploited as a vehicle for targeting Israel,” the letter states, adding that the anti-Israel “actions have at times reinforced the broader scourge of anti-Semitism and distracted certain UN entities from their original missions.”



Among the suggestions made to change direction was a stop to the denial by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) of the Christian and Jewish ties to Jerusalem. “UNESCO member states must be made to realize that these actions only undermine the credibility of the organization.”

Other issues requiring change, according to the letter, are the role of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), which perpetuates anti-Israel bias and actions; the funding of committees that “serve no purpose other than to attack Israel and to inspire the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement;” and, “most troubling,” the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which includes some of the world’s worst violators of human rights and whose “obsession with” Israel “makes a mockery” of the Council.

More sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization.

I see. The Great Satan Senate (In it’s entirety), is an Israeli propaganda organization.

Oh my. How difficult it must be for you to reconcile the fact that your mullahs and their legions of the Islamic brain dead can’t resolve this issue with a bit of typical Islamic conflict resolution via suicide bombing and AK-47’s.

That doesn’t mean you can’t..... wannabe.

 

[Roudy]

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

All 100 US Senators Demand End to UN Anti-Israel Bias

“Too often, the UN is exploited as a vehicle for targeting Israel,” the letter states, adding that the anti-Israel “actions have at times reinforced the broader scourge of anti-Semitism and distracted certain UN entities from their original missions.”



Among the suggestions made to change direction was a stop to the denial by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) of the Christian and Jewish ties to Jerusalem. “UNESCO member states must be made to realize that these actions only undermine the credibility of the organization.”

Other issues requiring change, according to the letter, are the role of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), which perpetuates anti-Israel bias and actions; the funding of committees that “serve no purpose other than to attack Israel and to inspire the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement;” and, “most troubling,” the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which includes some of the world’s worst violators of human rights and whose “obsession with” Israel “makes a mockery” of the Council.

More sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization.

I see. The Great Satan Senate (In it’s entirety), is an Israeli propaganda organization.

Oh my. How difficult it must be for you to reconcile the fact that your mullahs and their legions of the Islamic brain dead can’t resolve this issue with a bit of typical Islamic conflict resolution via suicide bombing and AK-47’s.

That doesn’t mean you can’t..... wannabe.

Palestine today! Watch Muslims point their butts to a site they claim to be "holy". Ya gotta love it.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

There is a swift undercurrent and a strong negative reaction emerging, concerning the developing anti-Semitic → anti-Israel movements that have the habit of suggesting that they represent the majority will of the people both here and abroad. And there is a possibility that these notions being promulgated by the extremists (Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters) are - in fact - commonly held views is going to generate a political backlash that will, yet again, cause the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) to lose even more of what they have gambled away thus far.

More sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization.

(COMMENT)

There is not very much support for the idea that the US should abandon the only source and contribution of economic, scientific and human development in the region. And if asked, most people in the world are not in favor of supplying the concentration of radicals with any additional support only to have it placed in the leadership hands that (after a half century) have only been able to give rise to a near-failed state, almost totally dependent on the contributions generated by external donor nations.

You say "sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization." But the actual motivation of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement and the current campaign to incite violence and further HoAP activity, is to coerce regional powers to:

• The threat of the use of violence, a method of combat, or a strategy to achieve certain goals and objectives --- with the aim to induce a state of fear in the target population, ruthless in its execution and not conform with either international humanitarian law or customary law of the era. In this case, like most pro-Arab Palestinian hostile activities, HoAP are characterized by extreme behavior that lacks conscience.

• The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.​

It is absolutely ludicrous to assume that the HoAP, that has a demonstrated history of past criminal behaviors SINCE the Independence of the State of Israel, did not further incite ever increasing level of violence in pursuit of their political and religious agendas; not discounting the hidden agenda including the aggrandizement of power, status, and wealth.

(SOUR GRAPES EXTENDED)

In the modern and contemporary view, one can look at the Israeli-Palestinian Centered Conflict in six very distinct and important periods:

• The Pre-WWI (The Great War 28 July 1914 → 11 November 1918) or the Armistice of Mudros (30 October 1918); although some would contend that the actual break-point was the Balfour Declaration (2 November 1917).

ψ Some will make the point that the real terminator here is the date of the The Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) hand-off to the Civil Administration (1 June 1920). And this is often considered more valid, as it is two years after the Armistice and two years before the Mandate.​

• The period covering the Mandate for Palestine • League of Nations • 12 August 1922 wherein the Principal Allied Powers agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on 2 November 1917, by the British Government, and adopted in favor of a national home for the Jewish people.

• The Civil War Period (June 1946 → 15 May 1948) and the outbreak of hostilities between the Arabs and the Jewish populations.

• The early Post-Mandate period between Israeli Independence (15 May 1948) and the Six-Day War (5 June 1967 → 10 June 1967).

• The Post-Six Day War Period (10 June 1967) and the Oslo Accord Period (11 October 1993).

• The Post-Oslo Accord Period (1993 → Present).​

We can argue the character and nature of the defense Israel maintained since the Post Mandate Period. But clearly, after the Armistice Agreements between Israel and the four Principe Arab Parties agreed upon in 1949, the existence of the State of Israel was firmly established. And just as clearly, Israel was no longer utilizing asymmetric and irregular forces as a defense against the Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters employed and support by the Arab League instigators. While the Arab League supported instigators condoned aircraft hijackings, piracy of cruise liners, suicide bombing, ambush attacks and the machine-gunning men, women and children on buses (etc), the Israelis were moving in the opposite direction and attempting to observe the rule of law and the rules of war as they were evolving.

The sour grapes is on the part of the HoAP wherein they are in constant complaint that they are unable to achieve through Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence the necessary political advantages to overcome the Israelis defenses; unable to achieve through illegal activities a clear advantage over the Israelis.

The Arab-Palestinians, which have consistently tactics have avoided the Principles of International and Contemporary Law cannot honestly claim even an inch of the moral high ground.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

There is a swift undercurrent and a strong negative reaction emerging, concerning the developing anti-Semitic → anti-Israel movements that have the habit of suggesting that they represent the majority will of the people both here and abroad. And there is a possibility that these notions being promulgated by the extremists (Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters) are - in fact - commonly held views is going to generate a political backlash that will, yet again, cause the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) to lose even more of what they have gambled away thus far.

More sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization.

(COMMENT)

There is not very much support for the idea that the US should abandon the only source and contribution of economic, scientific and human development in the region. And if asked, most people in the world are not in favor of supplying the concentration of radicals with any additional support only to have it placed in the leadership hands that (after a half century) have only been able to give rise to a near-failed state, almost totally dependent on the contributions generated by external donor nations.

You say "sour grapes from an Israeli propaganda organization." But the actual motivation of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement and the current campaign to incite violence and further HoAP activity, is to coerce regional powers to:

• The threat of the use of violence, a method of combat, or a strategy to achieve certain goals and objectives --- with the aim to induce a state of fear in the target population, ruthless in its execution and not conform with either international humanitarian law or customary law of the era. In this case, like most pro-Arab Palestinian hostile activities, HoAP are characterized by extreme behavior that lacks conscience.

• The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.​

It is absolutely ludicrous to assume that the HoAP, that has a demonstrated history of past criminal behaviors SINCE the Independence of the State of Israel, did not further incite ever increasing level of violence in pursuit of their political and religious agendas; not discounting the hidden agenda including the aggrandizement of power, status, and wealth.

(SOUR GRAPES EXTENDED)

In the modern and contemporary view, one can look at the Israeli-Palestinian Centered Conflict in six very distinct and important periods:

• The Pre-WWI (The Great War 28 July 1914 → 11 November 1918) or the Armistice of Mudros (30 October 1918); although some would contend that the actual break-point was the Balfour Declaration (2 November 1917).

ψ Some will make the point that the real terminator here is the date of the The Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) hand-off to the Civil Administration (1 June 1920). And this is often considered more valid, as it is two years after the Armistice and two years before the Mandate.​

• The period covering the Mandate for Palestine • League of Nations • 12 August 1922 wherein the Principal Allied Powers agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on 2 November 1917, by the British Government, and adopted in favor of a national home for the Jewish people.

• The Civil War Period (June 1946 → 15 May 1948) and the outbreak of hostilities between the Arabs and the Jewish populations.

• The early Post-Mandate period between Israeli Independence (15 May 1948) and the Six-Day War (5 June 1967 → 10 June 1967).

• The Post-Six Day War Period (10 June 1967) and the Oslo Accord Period (11 October 1993).

• The Post-Oslo Accord Period (1993 → Present).​

We can argue the character and nature of the defense Israel maintained since the Post Mandate Period. But clearly, after the Armistice Agreements between Israel and the four Principe Arab Parties agreed upon in 1949, the existence of the State of Israel was firmly established. And just as clearly, Israel was no longer utilizing asymmetric and irregular forces as a defense against the Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters employed and support by the Arab League instigators. While the Arab League supported instigators condoned aircraft hijackings, piracy of cruise liners, suicide bombing, ambush attacks and the machine-gunning men, women and children on buses (etc), the Israelis were moving in the opposite direction and attempting to observe the rule of law and the rules of war as they were evolving.

The sour grapes is on the part of the HoAP wherein they are in constant complaint that they are unable to achieve through Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence the necessary political advantages to overcome the Israelis defenses; unable to achieve through illegal activities a clear advantage over the Israelis.

The Arab-Palestinians, which have consistently tactics have avoided the Principles of International and Contemporary Law cannot honestly claim even an inch of the moral high ground.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Palestinians never wanted Israel's war and Israel always whines about the blow back.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Arab-Palestinians, which have consistently tactics have avoided the Principles of International and Contemporary Law

What law have they violated?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tiinmore, et al,

OH now your just playing dumb.

The Arab-Palestinians, which have consistently tactics have avoided the Principles of International and Contemporary Law

What law have they violated?

(COMMENT)

Almost every law on the books today, has been violated by the Arab Palestinians.

• They have Hijacked Aircraft.
• They have pirated Mediterranean Cruise liner.
• They have attacked athletes at an Olympic Event.
• They have conducted suicide bombing attacks against civilians.
• They have take people off a bus and lined them up for execution.
• They have kidnapped and murdered hostages.
• They have fired rockets and mortars indiscriminately, no target identified.
• etc, etc, etc ---

ALL since 1967; the last half century.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tiinmore, et al,

OH now your just playing dumb.

The Arab-Palestinians, which have consistently tactics have avoided the Principles of International and Contemporary Law

What law have they violated?

(COMMENT)

Almost every law on the books today, has been violated by the Arab Palestinians.

• They have Hijacked Aircraft.
• They have pirated Mediterranean Cruise liner.
• They have attacked athletes at an Olympic Event.
• They have conducted suicide bombing attacks against civilians.
• They have take people off a bus and lined them up for execution.
• They have kidnapped and murdered hostages.
• They have fired rockets and mortars indiscriminately, no target identified.
• etc, etc, etc ---

ALL since 1967; the last half century.

Most Respectfully,
R

OH now your just playing dumb.

He's not playing, he's a pro.
Olympic level dumb.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tiinmore, et al,

OH now your just playing dumb.

The Arab-Palestinians, which have consistently tactics have avoided the Principles of International and Contemporary Law

What law have they violated?

(COMMENT)

Almost every law on the books today, has been violated by the Arab Palestinians.

• They have Hijacked Aircraft.
• They have pirated Mediterranean Cruise liner.
• They have attacked athletes at an Olympic Event.
• They have conducted suicide bombing attacks against civilians.
• They have take people off a bus and lined them up for execution.
• They have kidnapped and murdered hostages.
• They have fired rockets and mortars indiscriminately, no target identified.
• etc, etc, etc ---

ALL since 1967; the last half century.

Most Respectfully,
R

They have never killed a protected person.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Israelis are not whining about the backlash.

The Palestinians never wanted Israel's war and Israel always whines about the blow back.

(COMMENT)

It is the Americans that see anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli bantering in the UN; in addition to the boycott.

It is time that the Hostile Arab Palestinians are penalized for their constant and continuous frivolous complaints.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Israelis are not whining about the backlash.

The Palestinians never wanted Israel's war and Israel always whines about the blow back.

(COMMENT)

It is the Americans that see anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli bantering in the UN; in addition to the boycott.

It is time that the Hostile Arab Palestinians are penalized for their constant and continuous frivolous complaints.

Most Respectfully,
R

What frivolous complaints?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tiinmore, et al,

This is subterfuge. You are implying that it is OK to target and kill Israelis! That would be wrong. 100% Wrong.

They have never killed a protected person.

(COMMENT)

THREE very important aspects here which your implications is in conflict with:

• It is NEVER permissible to intentionally target and kill civilians.
Rule 5. Civilians are persons who are not members of the armed forces. The civilian population comprises all persons who are civilians.

• Hostile Arab Palestinians who commit an offense which is solely intended to harm the Israeli Occupying Power, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offense committed.

• Hostile Arab Palestinians guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Israeli Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

OH for crying out loud.

What frivolous complaints?

(COMMENT)

You cannot make a legitimate complaint if you never st at the negotiating table in good faith.

For instance, you cannot complain about the Settlements when the are subject to Permanent Negotiations; and yo never even attempt to utilize the agreed upon dispute process. (Just one example...)

Most Respectfully,
R