Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The corrupt New BS GOP, pro secret money, lobbyists, pander to the rich and giant corps, has always been the problem. Trump is a mobbed up scumbag who won't show his tax returns, with 75 cases coming up in court and offers a W double down. After 25 years of GOP witch hunts against Hillary, NADA. But policies that will help. All the GOP has is BS propaganda and character assassination. PFFFFTTT!!!Where are Trump's emails between himself and his accountant? I want to see if a person running for government office has committed a crime against the government... We know he's skipped out on paying federal taxes for...for how many years now? Decades?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. See my signature for details..
Dear Silhouette Trump has been audited constantly are you kidding?
I know of lots of millionaires who avoid paying taxes because property and investment laws
permit so many writeoffs. That's why people in Congress keep those tax breaks,
because they use it to control their wealth. The Clintons do this, too, anyone
with knowledge of corporate finances are going to use the laws to keep the
most control of their wealth and channel money in ways they can direct.
They know how to use private corporations to do this, and the laws on tax breaks.
So if Trump hasn't been found guilty of anything why accuse him and not Clinton?
Which person took a vow of public office and yet either pushed policies
or bypassed checks that would ensure equal protection of interests of people of both parties?
Trump has shown that he obeys when his peers opposing him
threaten him with Constitutional checks/enforcement or even lawsuits.
He listens and backs off unlike Clinton who uses political connections to bypass laws.
Trump does not have those legal connections Clinton has to bypass checks and balances.
He's not a lawyer and has never pledged to put that system above the interests of the public.
sorry but all the lawyers I know end up having to support that system
which feeds off itself. lawyers can only use their own system if they
bow to other lawyers and judges who control the outcomes.
it's a dangerous incestuous cesspool, totally in violation of Constitutional
duties that money has superceded because of the cost of legal defense
that has become the worst elitist monopoly influencing everything else
subject to courts and lawsuits controlled by legal lobbyists and interests.
Facts, dumbass dupe/chicken little...HFW......High Frequecy Whiner........yoEverything you know about Soros is a disgraceful lie, dupe. Qatar is our greatest Muslim ally, and they gave money to probably the best charity in the world, not the Clintons, you brainwashed functional MORON.Along with Soros, Quatar, on and on... the FILTH of the world. They've all invested in the clintons.Goldman Sachs owns HillaryAnd all on the GOP side, dumbass dupe of greedy idiot billionaire liars and thieves...You are an absolute idiot, and there isn't a thing you could say that I would either believe or support other than if you said you were going to kill yourself, then I'd support that.
The corruption is SO DEEP AND TOTAL in Washington that NOTHING you PROGTARDS can say can hide it. The VAST majority of Americans see it, and you can't stop it, or LIE your way around it.
Sorry.
Farts, High Freqency Whiner....Facts, dumbass dupe/chicken little...HFW......High Frequecy Whiner........yoEverything you know about Soros is a disgraceful lie, dupe. Qatar is our greatest Muslim ally, and they gave money to probably the best charity in the world, not the Clintons, you brainwashed functional MORON.Along with Soros, Quatar, on and on... the FILTH of the world. They've all invested in the clintons.Goldman Sachs owns HillaryAnd all on the GOP side, dumbass dupe of greedy idiot billionaire liars and thieves...
The corrupt New BS GOP, pro secret money, lobbyists, pander to the rich and giant corps, has always been the problem. Trump is a mobbed up scumbag who won't show his tax returns, with 75 cases coming up in court and offers a W double down. After 25 years of GOP witch hunts against Hillary, NADA. But policies that will help. All the GOP has is BS propaganda and character assassination. PFFFFTTT!!!Where are Trump's emails between himself and his accountant? I want to see if a person running for government office has committed a crime against the government... We know he's skipped out on paying federal taxes for...for how many years now? Decades?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. See my signature for details..
Dear Silhouette Trump has been audited constantly are you kidding?
I know of lots of millionaires who avoid paying taxes because property and investment laws
permit so many writeoffs. That's why people in Congress keep those tax breaks,
because they use it to control their wealth. The Clintons do this, too, anyone
with knowledge of corporate finances are going to use the laws to keep the
most control of their wealth and channel money in ways they can direct.
They know how to use private corporations to do this, and the laws on tax breaks.
So if Trump hasn't been found guilty of anything why accuse him and not Clinton?
Which person took a vow of public office and yet either pushed policies
or bypassed checks that would ensure equal protection of interests of people of both parties?
Trump has shown that he obeys when his peers opposing him
threaten him with Constitutional checks/enforcement or even lawsuits.
He listens and backs off unlike Clinton who uses political connections to bypass laws.
Trump does not have those legal connections Clinton has to bypass checks and balances.
He's not a lawyer and has never pledged to put that system above the interests of the public.
sorry but all the lawyers I know end up having to support that system
which feeds off itself. lawyers can only use their own system if they
bow to other lawyers and judges who control the outcomes.
it's a dangerous incestuous cesspool, totally in violation of Constitutional
duties that money has superceded because of the cost of legal defense
that has become the worst elitist monopoly influencing everything else
subject to courts and lawsuits controlled by legal lobbyists and interests.
Brainwashed functional morons and lies about Hillary RULE!! And I doubt it lol...Someone got to Comey but it's too late....Clinton is going to lose tomorrow not because of emails or allowing her maid to copy classified fax's. She will lose because most voters do not like her and can clearly tell when she is lying. She gets that half smile on her face and looks down at her notes in search for a thought or a lie to get her beyond the question. She's a liar and she is not very good at it. That is why tomorrow will be the worst day of her life.
No Wry Catcher this started at the very beginning, not at the end.Do you understand Wry Catcher and Lakhota that just the existence exposure and transmission of confirmed classified material by private server is already a violation of rules and gross negligence?You love him, you hate him, and now you love him.
He is credible, he is not credible, now he is credible...
or, perhaps you are not credible....
Comey did his appointed damage, and now wants to try to convince the nation he was just doing his job. What a crock of bullshit, the guy has damaged democracy itself, intentionally and with malice of forethought. He was never hated by the Democrats, or loved by the Democrats, he is what he is another hack who abused the power of his office, just like Christie who inconvenience thousands of commuters out of spite.
Of course when HRC takes office he will get the pink slip (how fitting) and likely land a cushy job with a right wing think tank which will spent the next four years thinking about ways to harm a HRC presidency, no matter how such an agenda might harm our citizens.
And the only thing preventing charges is no provable evidence of INTENT which is subjective at this point, not proven by written evidence.
So any chance of finding a printed or recorded statement showing INTENT has to be examined or it appears a conflict of political interest to keep doing what you are doing and asking authorities NOT to look.
There is more pressure on Comey to keep looking because there is such a huge chance of conflicting interests with the money and emails changing hands between sides who would benefit from covering up and would be exposed for it.
He is under more pressure not to appear biased by looking the other way.
It's the opposite of how you frame it.
A fine effort to spin the issue, but it fails to turn. The entire fiasco was an effort by Comey to influence the election. Now, by your reasoning, you and others simply assume intent and thus reject the principle "innocent until proven guilty". Mobs of Trump supporters chanting "lock her up", and Trumps "worse than Watergate" rhetoric are examples of fascism, find a scapegoat and set the jackals upon it.
The pressure you claim Comey is/was under, was his own doing. Stupid people do not rise to such positions as the director of the FBI, buy even intelligent people sometimes F up. Sometimes F ups cost people their job. In Comey's case, a new AG will likely replace Comey as their first order of business.
The issue is proving INTENT.
How can you find evidence to prove INTENT if you aren't looking because you're afraid that looking for it appears biased.
It was never denied but fully confirmed AT THE START that classified materials were in the original emails that authorities confirmed should never have been transmitted by private server.
The issue of INTENT is what is subjective until there is evidence found.
You and I AGREE you can't assume INTENT without proof. The issue remains if the authorities are looking to find and prove intent or prefer it not be found. There is still a bias on how far they will try to find proof of intent.
The arguments on conflicts of interest with the AG are obvious. So that alone should have triggered a change to this process since people appointed by those investigated can't be expected to check themselves. That's a no brainer.
You forget Comey disavowed mens rea in his first press conference. No intent, no crime and he went even further by calling her a technological novice.
Ask yourself why would a Secretary of State would undermine her efforts of diplomacy to seek win-win solutions in foreign affairs by being indiscriminate on line?
BREAKING: Comey Says We Haven't Changed Conclusions Since July - Clears Hillary
TRANSLATION: We're still going to pretend that law requires us to prove "intent" for all her crimes, even though it never mentions it.
And this is more proof that the election is going to be a landslide for Trump. The quickness in name calling by the rabid american hating Clinton loon's.Brainwashed functional morons and lies about Hillary RULE!! And I doubt it lol...
He'l say any bs to get elected and cut taxes and regulation on himself. Period. The New BS GOP has blocked that restitution for 30 years- Hilary wants to get the boated rich to pay their fair share and help the the nonrich. Trickle down AGAIN? Wake up!The corrupt New BS GOP, pro secret money, lobbyists, pander to the rich and giant corps, has always been the problem. Trump is a mobbed up scumbag who won't show his tax returns, with 75 cases coming up in court and offers a W double down. After 25 years of GOP witch hunts against Hillary, NADA. But policies that will help. All the GOP has is BS propaganda and character assassination. PFFFFTTT!!!Where are Trump's emails between himself and his accountant? I want to see if a person running for government office has committed a crime against the government... We know he's skipped out on paying federal taxes for...for how many years now? Decades?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. See my signature for details..
Dear Silhouette Trump has been audited constantly are you kidding?
I know of lots of millionaires who avoid paying taxes because property and investment laws
permit so many writeoffs. That's why people in Congress keep those tax breaks,
because they use it to control their wealth. The Clintons do this, too, anyone
with knowledge of corporate finances are going to use the laws to keep the
most control of their wealth and channel money in ways they can direct.
They know how to use private corporations to do this, and the laws on tax breaks.
So if Trump hasn't been found guilty of anything why accuse him and not Clinton?
Which person took a vow of public office and yet either pushed policies
or bypassed checks that would ensure equal protection of interests of people of both parties?
Trump has shown that he obeys when his peers opposing him
threaten him with Constitutional checks/enforcement or even lawsuits.
He listens and backs off unlike Clinton who uses political connections to bypass laws.
Trump does not have those legal connections Clinton has to bypass checks and balances.
He's not a lawyer and has never pledged to put that system above the interests of the public.
sorry but all the lawyers I know end up having to support that system
which feeds off itself. lawyers can only use their own system if they
bow to other lawyers and judges who control the outcomes.
it's a dangerous incestuous cesspool, totally in violation of Constitutional
duties that money has superceded because of the cost of legal defense
that has become the worst elitist monopoly influencing everything else
subject to courts and lawsuits controlled by legal lobbyists and interests.
francoHFW whatever you think you have on Trump
it's nothing like the damage done by Democrats.
If you're going to say that about him,
do the same with the Democrats' dealings.
I think you could pay off govt debt with what you'd
find if both parties went after each other and collected back
debts and damages owed to taxpayers.
NOT this game of just using that to get elected,
then doing nothing to get taxpayers paid back restitution.
Who is more likely to get restitution for taxpayers:
someone whose political connections and corporate
backing for office depends on playing these games
and not getting held responsible?
Or someone who is attacking both parties for their
corporate conflicts of interest like Trump is?
Who is in a better position to check both parties
and demand restitution to taxpayers, someone
hiding or someone yelling and protesting both parties?
"I know, a tax cut for the rich!" Brainwashed functional moron.And this is more proof that the election is going to be a landslide for Trump. The quickness in name calling by the rabid american hating Clinton loon's.Brainwashed functional morons and lies about Hillary RULE!! And I doubt it lol...
And this is more proof that the election is going to be a landslide for Trump. The quickness in name calling by the rabid american hating Clinton loon's.Brainwashed functional morons and lies about Hillary RULE!! And I doubt it lol...
You're right, facts don't matter. LOL. Follow the con man. Tax cuts for the rich and deregulation for them work great....Farts, High Freqency Whiner....Facts, dumbass dupe/chicken little...HFW......High Frequecy Whiner........yoEverything you know about Soros is a disgraceful lie, dupe. Qatar is our greatest Muslim ally, and they gave money to probably the best charity in the world, not the Clintons, you brainwashed functional MORON.Along with Soros, Quatar, on and on... the FILTH of the world. They've all invested in the clintons.Goldman Sachs owns Hillary
He'l say any bs to get elected and cut taxes and regulation on himself. Period. The New BS GOP has blocked that restitution for 30 years- Hilary wants to get the boated rich to pay their fair share and help the the nonrich. Trickle down AGAIN? Wake up!The corrupt New BS GOP, pro secret money, lobbyists, pander to the rich and giant corps, has always been the problem. Trump is a mobbed up scumbag who won't show his tax returns, with 75 cases coming up in court and offers a W double down. After 25 years of GOP witch hunts against Hillary, NADA. But policies that will help. All the GOP has is BS propaganda and character assassination. PFFFFTTT!!!Where are Trump's emails between himself and his accountant? I want to see if a person running for government office has committed a crime against the government... We know he's skipped out on paying federal taxes for...for how many years now? Decades?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. See my signature for details..
Dear Silhouette Trump has been audited constantly are you kidding?
I know of lots of millionaires who avoid paying taxes because property and investment laws
permit so many writeoffs. That's why people in Congress keep those tax breaks,
because they use it to control their wealth. The Clintons do this, too, anyone
with knowledge of corporate finances are going to use the laws to keep the
most control of their wealth and channel money in ways they can direct.
They know how to use private corporations to do this, and the laws on tax breaks.
So if Trump hasn't been found guilty of anything why accuse him and not Clinton?
Which person took a vow of public office and yet either pushed policies
or bypassed checks that would ensure equal protection of interests of people of both parties?
Trump has shown that he obeys when his peers opposing him
threaten him with Constitutional checks/enforcement or even lawsuits.
He listens and backs off unlike Clinton who uses political connections to bypass laws.
Trump does not have those legal connections Clinton has to bypass checks and balances.
He's not a lawyer and has never pledged to put that system above the interests of the public.
sorry but all the lawyers I know end up having to support that system
which feeds off itself. lawyers can only use their own system if they
bow to other lawyers and judges who control the outcomes.
it's a dangerous incestuous cesspool, totally in violation of Constitutional
duties that money has superceded because of the cost of legal defense
that has become the worst elitist monopoly influencing everything else
subject to courts and lawsuits controlled by legal lobbyists and interests.
francoHFW whatever you think you have on Trump
it's nothing like the damage done by Democrats.
If you're going to say that about him,
do the same with the Democrats' dealings.
I think you could pay off govt debt with what you'd
find if both parties went after each other and collected back
debts and damages owed to taxpayers.
NOT this game of just using that to get elected,
then doing nothing to get taxpayers paid back restitution.
Who is more likely to get restitution for taxpayers:
someone whose political connections and corporate
backing for office depends on playing these games
and not getting held responsible?
Or someone who is attacking both parties for their
corporate conflicts of interest like Trump is?
Who is in a better position to check both parties
and demand restitution to taxpayers, someone
hiding or someone yelling and protesting both parties?
Clinton's "corruption" is actually New BS GOP spin of her transparency...Breaking for dupes: Possibly the world's best charity is NOT a slush fund, Putin is NOT your friend, no evidence of actual wrong doing by DNC or anyone else from e-mails- just staffers BSing, Hilary has been investigated for everything FOREVER- NOTHING but GOP BS over and over and over. HELLOOOOO?And this is more proof that the election is going to be a landslide for Trump. The quickness in name calling by the rabid american hating Clinton loon's.Brainwashed functional morons and lies about Hillary RULE!! And I doubt it lol...
No Rambunctious it's going to be a closer race than what you can call a landslide.
Clinton's lack of transparency and Trump's lack of discretion both cost them public trust and image.
So neither has this in the bag, but it's up to voters.
and thanks to Sanders Greens and Johnson Libertarians
more people are aware that the Electoral college and House of Representatives
can also change the outcome of elections if not this time maybe next time.
That's closer than where we were last time.
Now people are looking into other choices besides both major parties.
It's no longer a game of one side wins and one loses,
but awareness this isn't working for more and more people left out of the loop.
Go after the greedy idiot brainwashing, thieving, screw the workers GOP rich. The Dem rich WANT to pay more. And invest in America for the first time in 35 years...He'l say any bs to get elected and cut taxes and regulation on himself. Period. The New BS GOP has blocked that restitution for 30 years- Hilary wants to get the boated rich to pay their fair share and help the the nonrich. Trickle down AGAIN? Wake up!The corrupt New BS GOP, pro secret money, lobbyists, pander to the rich and giant corps, has always been the problem. Trump is a mobbed up scumbag who won't show his tax returns, with 75 cases coming up in court and offers a W double down. After 25 years of GOP witch hunts against Hillary, NADA. But policies that will help. All the GOP has is BS propaganda and character assassination. PFFFFTTT!!!Where are Trump's emails between himself and his accountant? I want to see if a person running for government office has committed a crime against the government... We know he's skipped out on paying federal taxes for...for how many years now? Decades?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. See my signature for details..
Dear Silhouette Trump has been audited constantly are you kidding?
I know of lots of millionaires who avoid paying taxes because property and investment laws
permit so many writeoffs. That's why people in Congress keep those tax breaks,
because they use it to control their wealth. The Clintons do this, too, anyone
with knowledge of corporate finances are going to use the laws to keep the
most control of their wealth and channel money in ways they can direct.
They know how to use private corporations to do this, and the laws on tax breaks.
So if Trump hasn't been found guilty of anything why accuse him and not Clinton?
Which person took a vow of public office and yet either pushed policies
or bypassed checks that would ensure equal protection of interests of people of both parties?
Trump has shown that he obeys when his peers opposing him
threaten him with Constitutional checks/enforcement or even lawsuits.
He listens and backs off unlike Clinton who uses political connections to bypass laws.
Trump does not have those legal connections Clinton has to bypass checks and balances.
He's not a lawyer and has never pledged to put that system above the interests of the public.
sorry but all the lawyers I know end up having to support that system
which feeds off itself. lawyers can only use their own system if they
bow to other lawyers and judges who control the outcomes.
it's a dangerous incestuous cesspool, totally in violation of Constitutional
duties that money has superceded because of the cost of legal defense
that has become the worst elitist monopoly influencing everything else
subject to courts and lawsuits controlled by legal lobbyists and interests.
francoHFW whatever you think you have on Trump
it's nothing like the damage done by Democrats.
If you're going to say that about him,
do the same with the Democrats' dealings.
I think you could pay off govt debt with what you'd
find if both parties went after each other and collected back
debts and damages owed to taxpayers.
NOT this game of just using that to get elected,
then doing nothing to get taxpayers paid back restitution.
Who is more likely to get restitution for taxpayers:
someone whose political connections and corporate
backing for office depends on playing these games
and not getting held responsible?
Or someone who is attacking both parties for their
corporate conflicts of interest like Trump is?
Who is in a better position to check both parties
and demand restitution to taxpayers, someone
hiding or someone yelling and protesting both parties?
Dear francoHFW shouldn't it be the WRONGDOERS paying back the taxpayers their share of profits?
Are the people you want to charge the people responsible for the wrongs
or just because people make money they ought to pay for corruption of others?
Really?
Which group do you think we should go after: anyone who makes money
or go after the crooks and abusers who profit off deals and waste at public expense.
What is your idea of justice and deterrence of crime?
Which one? Thanks!
He'l say any bs to get elected
Kasich would have beat Hillary. However, the GOP looses if Trump wins or looses.Trying to explain to Republicans had they run a kasich or Romney they'd be winning this one?
Or trying to explain the 100 things about trump that make him unqualified?
Kasich would have beat Hillary. However, the GOP looses if Trump wins or looses.Trying to explain to Republicans had they run a kasich or Romney they'd be winning this one?
Or trying to explain the 100 things about trump that make him unqualified?
