Breaking: McDaniel's Team Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls In 9 Mississippi Counties

[Steve_McGarrett]

The corruption continues on epic levels in Mississippi. The local clerks of court have had their marching orders from their masters.

BREAKING: McDaniel Supporters Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls in Nine Mississippi Counties | The Gateway Pundit

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi.

BREAKING: McDaniel Supporters Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls in Nine Mississippi Counties | The Gateway Pundit

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi amongst the Republicans.

You left that part out. Bahahahahaa.....

 

[bripat9643]

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi.

BREAKING: McDaniel Supporters Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls in Nine Mississippi Counties | The Gateway Pundit

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi amongst the Republicans.

You left that part out. Bahahahahaa.....

That would be the establishment Republicans that Mississippi Democrats just voted for and that you supported. How, where is the evidence that Republicans are the ones refusing to allow the McDaniels campaign to look at the voter rolls?

BTW, I just donated $50 to the McDaniels campaign to help their effort to disqualify the election.

 

[HenryBHough]

One might but wonder what is in there that the powered elite don't want anyone to see.

Remember the good old days of "open and transparent"? Those words were so veddy veddy fash just one or two election cycles ago. Not just at the national level but right down to Democrats seeking to be dog catchers in districts where there were enough ethinc restaurants to get a bidding war going.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi.

BREAKING: McDaniel Supporters Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls in Nine Mississippi Counties | The Gateway Pundit

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi amongst the Republicans.

You left that part out. Bahahahahaa.....

That would be the establishment Republicans that Mississippi Democrats just voted for and that you supported. How, where is the evidence that Republicans are the ones refusing to allow the McDaniels campaign to look at the voter rolls?

BTW, I just donated $50 to the McDaniels campaign to help their effort to disqualify the election.

Flushing that $50 directly down the toilet would have the same effect.

You're probably just helping McDaniels pay down his campaign debt.

 

[bripat9643]

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi amongst the Republicans.

You left that part out. Bahahahahaa.....

That would be the establishment Republicans that Mississippi Democrats just voted for and that you supported. How, where is the evidence that Republicans are the ones refusing to allow the McDaniels campaign to look at the voter rolls?

BTW, I just donated $50 to the McDaniels campaign to help their effort to disqualify the election.

Flushing that $50 directly down the toilet would have the same effect.

You're probably just helping McDaniels pay down his campaign debt.

One could say that about donating to any political campaign.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

That would be the establishment Republicans that Mississippi Democrats just voted for and that you supported. How, where is the evidence that Republicans are the ones refusing to allow the McDaniels campaign to look at the voter rolls?

BTW, I just donated $50 to the McDaniels campaign to help their effort to disqualify the election.

Flushing that $50 directly down the toilet would have the same effect.

You're probably just helping McDaniels pay down his campaign debt.

One could say that about donating to any political campaign.

Yep.

Hence why I don't donate money to candidates - particularly to the losing candidate of an election that already happened.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I sure hope Katherine Harris doesn't rush to certify these election results.

bwa. ha. ha.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I sure hope Katherine Harris doesn't rush to certify these election results.

bwa. ha. ha.

You of course are aware that the Supreme Court AGREED with Bush 7 to 2 in 2000?

 

[Peach]

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi amongst the Republicans.

You left that part out. Bahahahahaa.....

That would be the establishment Republicans that Mississippi Democrats just voted for and that you supported. How, where is the evidence that Republicans are the ones refusing to allow the McDaniels campaign to look at the voter rolls?

BTW, I just donated $50 to the McDaniels campaign to help their effort to disqualify the election.

Flushing that $50 directly down the toilet would have the same effect.

You're probably just helping McDaniels pay down his campaign debt.

McDaniel came close enough, and there are valid questions concerning votes that violate the state's convoluted voting laws, to warrant a review. Perhaps amending those laws would be the result. McDaniel should ask for a statewide review however. Right now, if one voted Democratic June 3, one could not vote Republican June 24. That is the law until it is struck down, or amended. There were four candidates that ran for the nomination to be the Democratic challenger; thus it is to be expected many Democrats voted. Cochran did call for Democrats to GOTV, the qualifying language in his ads may not have been "noticed".

 

[Peach]

I sure hope Katherine Harris doesn't rush to certify these election results.

bwa. ha. ha.

You of course are aware that the Supreme Court AGREED with Bush 7 to 2 in 2000?

5-4, Bush ran out the clock. Still, the election was so very close, it matters not.

"In the circumstances of this case, any manual recount of votes seeking to meet the December 12 “safe harbor” deadline would be unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Florida Supreme Court reversed and remanded."

540,000 out of nearly 100 million is no mandate.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

That would be the establishment Republicans that Mississippi Democrats just voted for and that you supported. How, where is the evidence that Republicans are the ones refusing to allow the McDaniels campaign to look at the voter rolls?

BTW, I just donated $50 to the McDaniels campaign to help their effort to disqualify the election.

Flushing that $50 directly down the toilet would have the same effect.

You're probably just helping McDaniels pay down his campaign debt.

McDaniel came close enough, and there are valid questions concerning votes that violate the state's convoluted voting laws, to warrant a review. Perhaps amending those laws would be the result. McDaniel should ask for a statewide review however. Right now, if one voted Democratic June 3, one could not vote Republican June 24. That is the law until it is struck down, or amended. There were four candidates that ran for the nomination to be the Democratic challenger; thus it is to be expected many Democrats voted. Cochran did call for Democrats to GOTV, the qualifying language in his ads may not have been "noticed".

Mississippi does not track it's voters by party, so it's impossible to know how many "Democrats" there are, and how many "Republicans".

Only 84,000 votes were cast in the June 3rd Democratic primary.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I sure hope Katherine Harris doesn't rush to certify these election results.

bwa. ha. ha.

You of course are aware that the Supreme Court AGREED with Bush 7 to 2 in 2000?

It was 5 to 4 along partisan lines that upheld the deadline.

 

[OriginalShroom]

I sure hope Katherine Harris doesn't rush to certify these election results.

bwa. ha. ha.

You of course are aware that the Supreme Court AGREED with Bush 7 to 2 in 2000?

It was 5 to 4 along partisan lines that upheld the deadline.

why do you lie?

 

[Peach]

Flushing that $50 directly down the toilet would have the same effect.

You're probably just helping McDaniels pay down his campaign debt.

McDaniel came close enough, and there are valid questions concerning votes that violate the state's convoluted voting laws, to warrant a review. Perhaps amending those laws would be the result. McDaniel should ask for a statewide review however. Right now, if one voted Democratic June 3, one could not vote Republican June 24. That is the law until it is struck down, or amended. There were four candidates that ran for the nomination to be the Democratic challenger; thus it is to be expected many Democrats voted. Cochran did call for Democrats to GOTV, the qualifying language in his ads may not have been "noticed".

Mississippi does not track it's voters by party, so it's impossible to know how many "Democrats" there are, and how many "Republicans".

Only 84,000 votes were cast in the June 3rd Democratic primary.

As I noted, Mississippi needs some amendments to their twisted voting laws.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You of course are aware that the Supreme Court AGREED with Bush 7 to 2 in 2000?

It was 5 to 4 along partisan lines that upheld the deadline.

why do you lie?

The Court ruled 5–4 that no constitutionally valid recount could be completed by a December 12 "safe harbor" deadline. The Court asserted that "the Supreme Court of Florida has said that the legislature intended the State's electors to 'participat[e] fully in the federal electoral process,' as provided in 3 U.S.C. § 5." The Court therefore effectively ended the proposed recount, because "the Florida Legislature intended to obtain the safe-harbor benefits of 3 U.S. C. §5."

Four justices (Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Souter and Breyer) dissented as to stopping the recount. Two of those four dissenters (Justices Breyer and Souter) acknowledged that the counting up until December 9 had not conformed with Equal Protection requirements. However, Souter and Breyer favored remanding the case back to the Florida Supreme Court for the purpose of crafting specific guidelines for how to count disputed ballots, in contrast to the majority's decision to halt the recount altogether.[36] The actual counting had ended with the December 9 injunction issued by the same five-justice majority, three days before any deadline.[24]

 

[Peach]

It was 5 to 4 along partisan lines that upheld the deadline.

why do you lie?

The Court ruled 5–4 that no constitutionally valid recount could be completed by a December 12 "safe harbor" deadline. The Court asserted that "the Supreme Court of Florida has said that the legislature intended the State's electors to 'participat[e] fully in the federal electoral process,' as provided in 3 U.S.C. § 5." The Court therefore effectively ended the proposed recount, because "the Florida Legislature intended to obtain the safe-harbor benefits of 3 U.S. C. §5."

Four justices (Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Souter and Breyer) dissented as to stopping the recount. Two of those four dissenters (Justices Breyer and Souter) acknowledged that the counting up until December 9 had not conformed with Equal Protection requirements. However, Souter and Breyer favored remanding the case back to the Florida Supreme Court for the purpose of crafting specific guidelines for how to count disputed ballots, in contrast to the majority's decision to halt the recount altogether.[36] The actual counting had ended with the December 9 injunction issued by the same five-justice majority, three days before any deadline.[24]

Stevens dissent is classic, beautifully written, and memorable.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

McDaniel came close enough, and there are valid questions concerning votes that violate the state's convoluted voting laws, to warrant a review. Perhaps amending those laws would be the result. McDaniel should ask for a statewide review however. Right now, if one voted Democratic June 3, one could not vote Republican June 24. That is the law until it is struck down, or amended. There were four candidates that ran for the nomination to be the Democratic challenger; thus it is to be expected many Democrats voted. Cochran did call for Democrats to GOTV, the qualifying language in his ads may not have been "noticed".

Mississippi does not track it's voters by party, so it's impossible to know how many "Democrats" there are, and how many "Republicans".

Only 84,000 votes were cast in the June 3rd Democratic primary.

As I noted, Mississippi needs some amendments to their twisted voting laws.

Their state, their voting system. If they want change it, they will.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I sure hope Katherine Harris doesn't rush to certify these election results.

bwa. ha. ha.

You of course are aware that the Supreme Court AGREED with Bush 7 to 2 in 2000?

5-4, Bush ran out the clock. Still, the election was so very close, it matters not.

"In the circumstances of this case, any manual recount of votes seeking to meet the December 12 “safe harbor” deadline would be unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Florida Supreme Court reversed and remanded."

540,000 out of nearly 100 million is no mandate.

The decision that the recount was unequal and illegal was 7 to 2. The only thing that was 5 to 4 was the attempt to allow further recounts to occur with so few days left till the mandatory deadline before ALL of Florida's votes were not counted at all.

 

[Dad2three]

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi.

BREAKING: McDaniel Supporters Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls in Nine Mississippi Counties | The Gateway Pundit

The corruption continues at epic levels in Mississippi amongst the Republicans.

You left that part out. Bahahahahaa.....

Oh in other words conservatives, AGAIN, want special privileges afforded them, from your link:

"Then the county clerk told her the Secretary of State’s office said the county had to redact the Social Security number and addresses from the voter rolls. The clerk said it will take until Wednesday to redact the information. And, the county will charge McDaniel supporters for the extra work."

RULES, FOLLOW THEM!!!!