Breaking! New York AG Letitia James Caught On Video Saying Judge Engoron Found Donald Trump Guilty “Before This Trial Even Began” (VIDEO)

[shockedcanadian]

Is that like getting caught speeding?
Or double parked?

Lots of other people doing it, but you're the one that got caught.

Tell it to the judge.

True but that doesn't mean he isn't guilty. The guy who gets caught speeding can say the same about the many others never caught.

Unless the police only follow his car but let the others fly by. That is a violation of his Rights and no different than targetting someone for their race or religion, in this case it is their political affiliiation and popularity. The world sees this, you must know this right? Does it help or hurt America?

 

[Arlette]

Throw this case out. She admitted Judge Engoron had already found Trump guilty before the trial ever started. What Engoron did was unethical on epic levels. He should be impeached along with James who campaigned on going after Trump.

Video of Letitia James

NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty “Before This Trial Even Began” (VIDEO)​

COMMUNISM: NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty "Before This Trial Even Began" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Due process and fair trials are fundamental principles of any democratic society.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Breaking!!!!!!

Good morning Macho. Did you sleep good?

 

[mudwhistle]

They would complain that during the penalty phase of a capital murder trial, that it's unfair, because the judge said he was guilty before the penalty phase even started.

These people are insane.

The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.
So yes, there would be a valid complaint that the trial was pre-judged.
It means that the accused wasn't given due-process within the law.
And folks like you seem to think a summary judgement is all that matters in this trial.

Your sense of right & wrong is highly suspect.

 

[pknopp]

Unless the police only follow his car but let the others fly by. That is a violation of his Rights and no different than targetting someone for their race or religion, in this case it is their political affiliiation and popularity. The world sees this, you must know this right? Does it help or hurt America?

He broke the law. Prosecuting someone for that is not a violation of their rights.

Sadly many do not care that many are targeted simply over their race. Having a "wide set nose" is not illegal.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.
So yes, there would be a valid complaint that the trial was pre-judged.

Summary Judgement was requested by both parties based on the motions, briefs, video depositions and evidence attached to the briefs.

The Judge ruled on only 1 of 7 claims, the other 6 remanded to trial.

Doing something BOTH parties requested based on briefs isn't "pre-judging", especially when most of the complaints were referred to trial.

It means that the accused wasn't given due-process within the law.

No it doesn't.

And folks like you seem to think a summary judgement is all that matters in this trial.

It only matters to the one claim that was decided by summary judgement based on the request of both parties.

It's not relevant to the other 6 claims that will be determined by the trial.

WW

 

[Arlette]

The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.
So yes, there would be a valid complaint that the trial was pre-judged.
It means that the accused wasn't given due-process within the law.
And folks like you seem to think a summary judgement is all that matters in this trial.

Your sense of right & wrong is highly suspect.

Yeah Muddy, the judge passed judgement. In Trump's case a summary judgment on the merits.

 

[shockedcanadian]

He broke the law. Prosecuting someone for that is not a violation of their rights.

Sadly many do not care that many are targeted simply over their race. Having a "wide set nose" is not illegal.

I care about all injustices. If we are to survive as a species, we need to be honourable and have integrity. I despise abusers and cowardice. Despise it to my core.

 

[mudwhistle]

He broke the law. Prosecuting someone for that is not a violation of their rights.

Sadly many do not care that many are targeted simply over their race. Having a "wide set nose" is not illegal.

They can't really name the law he broke.

All they're doing is saying he over-valued his assets.

There's no law that says you can't say what you think your property is worth.
That would mean that they could arrest anyone and force them to prove how much they're worth. And if you're wrong you should be thrown in prison.

What are you.....a fcking Nazi?

 

[Arlette]

Macho Man got grabbed again

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Throw this case out. She admitted Judge Engoron had already found Trump guilty before the trial ever started. What Engoron did was unethical on epic levels. He should be impeached along with James who campaigned on going after Trump.

Video of Letitia James

NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty “Before This Trial Even Began” (VIDEO)​

COMMUNISM: NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty "Before This Trial Even Began" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Due process and fair trials are fundamental principles of any democratic society.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Color me shocked

 

[mudwhistle]

Summary Judgement was requested by both parties based on the motions, briefs, video depositions and evidence attached to the briefs.

The Judge ruled on only 1 of 7 claims, the other 6 remanded to trial.

Doing something BOTH parties requested based on briefs isn't "pre-judging", especially when most of the complaints were referred to trial.



No it doesn't.



It only matters to the one claim that was decided by summary judgement based on the request of both parties.

It's not relevant to the other 6 claims that will be determined by the trial.

WW

Please show me proof of this, mkay?

I want to see the docs that shows that both parties asked for this judge to prejudge the case.

Show me the request in writing.

BTW, I think you're confusing the document trial with the New York case.

 

[postman]

Unless the police only follow his car but let the others fly by. That is a violation of his Rights and no different than targetting someone for their race or religion, in this case it is their political affiliiation and popularity.

That's not what happened.

Survey of Past New York Felony Prosecutions for Falsifying Business Records

A survey of years of New York criminal cases, which shows that the prosecution of falsifying business records in first degree is common.

www.justsecurity.org

March 21, 2023

A core crime that the Manhattan District Attorney will likely include in an indictment of former President Donald Trump is “falsifying business records in the first degree,” a felony under New York State law (N.Y. Penal Code § 175.10). Prosecutors and indeed all of us are compelled by the rule of law to consider how such a charge compares to past prosecutions.


The People of the State of New York v. Josue Aguilar Dubon, AKA Saady Dubon, AKA Alejandro Ortiz (October 2022) — Bronx business owner indicted for failing to report over $1 million in income, avoiding paying $60,000 in taxes.
The People of the State of New York v. Scott Kirtland (February 2022) — Insurance broker indicted for allegedly creating/filing fraudulent certificates of liability insurance to further scheme to defraud.
The People of the State of New York v. James Garner (November 2021) — Mental health therapy aide indicted for allegedly defrauding over $35,000 in workers’ compensation benefits.
The People of the State of New York v. Jose Palmer (November 2016) — Pleaded guilty to petit larceny for unemployment benefits fraud of over $3,000, having initially been indicted for grand larceny and falsifying business records in the first degree.
The People of the State of New York v. Jason Holley (November 2016) — Convicted by jury of falsifying business records in the first degree but acquitted of the predicate crime, insurance fraud.
The People of the State of New York v. Christina Murray (May 2015) & People v. Terrel Murray (May 2014) — Married couple convicted of house fire insurance claim, attempting to recover the cash value of various items of property that were ostensibly lost in the fire.
The People of the State of New York v. Barbara A. Freeland (June 2013) — Convicted for falsely claiming on a food stamps application that a young adult lived with her.
The People of the State of New York v. Maria F. Ramirez (August 2010) — Convicted for returning unpurchased items to a store in exchange for store credit, thus causing a false entry in a business record of an enterprise, and using the store credit to purchase additional items one day.

 

[rightwinger]

Umm yes. Equal justice before the law, Lady Justice is b!ind etc.. If they are going after one person rather than another, you can call yourself Russia, Korea.or Canada instead of the United States. Some wouls willingly sink.your entire nations soul in order to persecute one man and his voters. The same.voters who voted Obama in twice.

Does nothing to negate Trumps guilt

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A racist prosecutor and a batshit nuts judge

Basically

 

[postman]

The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.

An example of the evidence, you claim wasn't introduced, was Trump reporting the value of his Trump Tower home, at over 30,000 square feet.

When it was actually just over 10,000 square feet.

 

[rightwinger]

A racist prosecutor and a batshit nuts judge

Basically

And a guilty TRUMP organization

 

[SassyIrishLass]

And a guilty TRUMP organization

Blah blah blah... keep bleating

Nobody cares

 

[rightwinger]

Blah blah blah... keep bleating

Nobody cares

The TRUMP organization has already been found guilty of fraud

Trump cares

 

[mudwhistle]

An example of the evidence, you claim wasn't introduced, was Trump reporting the value of his Trump Tower home, at over 30,000 square feet.

When it was actually just over 10,000 square feet.

OMG.....so you're saying that the city of New York is unable to use a tape measure?

 

[Jarlaxle]

This is not how you're supposed to be talking to the pubic during a trial.

Is shows clear prejudice.

It shows clear malice and is grounds for a mistrial.

I hope they get their asses handed to them for their unethical and illegal conduct before, during, and after this trial.

They need to be disbarred.

I wasn't commenting on the summary judgement.
That's another issue.
This speech shows her malicious intent.
The entire case is built on bad feelings toward a suspect by the judge and prosecutor, and a refusal by the judge and prosecutor to look for the truth.
Not to mention the fact that there is no crime here in the first place.
Nobody was hurt.
Nobody's complaining of being ripped off, even the banks.
The banks testified that they couldn't understand the purpose of the trial to begin with.

Malicious prosecution. Sadly, the punishment for that is not what it should be. (That is: public crucifixion.)

There was a point where the investors in Bernie Madoff said the same thing. They were completely happy with the 15% return on their investment. None of them felt ripped off either, until the truth came out much later.

You cannot be this stupid. It's not possible.

Trump being charged with the same activities that 1000s of businessman and corporations in NY engage in every day.

And the lenders have stated-repeatedly, in open court-that they had no problems with any of it. The loans are all current (some already paid back in full), absolutely nothing unusual happened here.