Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely....he intimidated congressional witnesses and was a threat to destroy evidence. So a message was sent to those who would commit this serious crime. I wonder who could have been the recipient of this message? Hmm......Do you approve of the nazi storm trooper FBI tactics to arrest Roger Stone?
Why do you disapprove?Do you approve of the nazi storm trooper FBI tactics to arrest Roger Stone?
He was the coffee boy.Trump is going to act like he has never met him.
He has had two years to destroy any evidence, fool....What happened yesterday was more befitting of East Germany than the USA.Absolutely....he intimidated congressional witnesses and was a threat to destroy evidence. So a message was sent to those who would commit this serious crime. I wonder who could have been the recipient of this message? Hmm......Do you approve of the nazi storm trooper FBI tactics to arrest Roger Stone?
It's nonsense that Steele is a foreign spy? I think even Steele admits that.False. This is utter nonsense and one has to wonder if you are ever going to take the hint that reality never, ever aligns with your trump cult fantasies, and rethink your ways.Steele was also a foreign spy, so paying him was also illegal.
That doesn't enter into the minds of the police or the judges who grant search warrants . Just as it didn't with Cohen. Cohen had 10 years as Trump's criminal lawyer. So what you are saying is just contrived Trumpkin crybabying.He has had two years to destroy any evidence, fool.
Meaningless. Incoming administrations communicate with foreign governments. It's not against the law, and no one in the Trump administration has denied that it happened.
Correct. He was, not is. Furthermore, the intermediary helped make the whole thing legal. Thats what happens when you have people with experience, instead of hiring Russian monsters, Infowars editors, and your own idiot groin spawn to make your campaign decisions. Cry us a river.It's nonsense that Steele is a foreign spy?
I haven't seen any evidence for that.Absolutely....he intimidated congressional witnesses and was a threat to destroy evidence. So a message was sent to those who would commit this serious crime. I wonder who could have been the recipient of this message? Hmm......Do you approve of the nazi storm trooper FBI tactics to arrest Roger Stone?
NO, the intermediary served as the money launderer. That's just another law Hillary broke. Things that you do personally that are crimes don't suddenly become legal when you have your lawyer pay for it.Correct. He was, not is. Furthermore, the intermediary helped make the whole thing legal. Thats what happens when you have people with experience, instead of hiring Russian monsters, Infowars editors, and your own idiot groin spawn to make your campaign decisions. Cry us a river.It's nonsense that Steele is a foreign spy?
Well no shit, Mueller doesn't brief you. But those are, in fact, the charges which lead to the warrant and arrest. Try to focus and stay on topic.I haven't seen any evidence for that.
Wrong again, as the payments were disclosed and in no way represent illegal money laundering. Sorry dude, this fantasy of yours is going exactly nowhere.NO, the intermediary served as the money launderer.
I know those are the charges. Thanks for admitting you haven't seen any evidence to support them.Well no shit, Mueller doesn't brief you. But those are, in fact, the charges which lead to the warrant and arrest. Try to focus and stay on topic.I haven't seen any evidence for that.
Of course I haven't. But I do believe evidence exists, as should you. But regardless, those are the charges which frame this arrest.I know those are the charges. Thanks for admitting you haven't seen any evidence to support them.Well no shit, Mueller doesn't brief you. But those are, in fact, the charges which lead to the warrant and arrest. Try to focus and stay on topic.I haven't seen any evidence for that.
There is a federal statute which stipulates that foreign nationals cannot contribute to political campaigns. This contribution can be anything of value.It certainly was illegal to pay foreign spies to manufacture dirt on your political opponent. Steele was also a foreign spy, so paying him was also illegal. Doing it through your law firm is money laundering, which is also illegal.Nothing illegal about paying for dossier.Extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence.When you are supposed to be investigating Russian Collusion and intentionally ignore the fact that Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton and The DNC we’re working with Russian intelligence to attack Donald Trump, impact our election, and launch a massive Espionage Operation against his campaign and his family in the midst of an election then you know Mueller is an Evil, Godless man.
There was a COUP and The White House launched it ordered it and sanctioned it all in an attempt to get Hillary Clinton elected.
I take it that you are still all in on a 'soft coup'.
Well, you have alot of company as so is the FBI.
I mean, seriously, no one in the FBI of any influence, resisted the idea of arresting Stone in the manner that they did?
Has the FBI morphed into Hillarys personal KGB?
Looks like it!
And, this is alarming.
Where is your evidence?
For starters, let's begin with Hillary crying 'wolf' when she lost and then the still to this day unsubstantiated dossier that she paid for.
Any other questions, nimrod?
You're supposed to be proving that Obama and Hillary worked with russian intelligence to hurt Trump. The only evidence is that fusion gps hired steele.
Once again, you admitted that you haven't seen any evidence. Stop while you are behind.Of course I haven't. But I do believe evidence exists, as should you. But regardless, those are the charges which frame this arrest.I know those are the charges. Thanks for admitting you haven't seen any evidence to support them.Well no shit, Mueller doesn't brief you. But those are, in fact, the charges which lead to the warrant and arrest. Try to focus and stay on topic.I haven't seen any evidence for that.
Correct, and I will say it again. But we aren't debating his guilt. We were talking about the arrest. And you are trying to change the subject, because that's what you think you are supposed to do.Once again, you admitted that you haven't seen any evidence.
Wrong, turd. I have been talking about the evidence. You want to divert the discussion by restating the charges, as if we don't already know what they are.Correct, and I will say it again. But we aren't debating his guilt. We were talking about the arrest. And you are trying to change the subject, because that's what you think you are supposed to do.Once again, you admitted that you haven't seen any evidence.
