BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,799
- 26,966
Grow up.That rigged TRump SCOTUS you just crowed about?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grow up.That rigged TRump SCOTUS you just crowed about?
America.You know as well as I do that the Supreme Court is going to hear this case one way or another.
All this ruling does is waste time and increase the likelihood that this trial never happens.
Who benefits from that?
In this country, guilt has to be proven, not “innocense”, dumbass.
Jack Smith isn’t political. You are.Yes...it's political...the entire trial is political. What do you think we've been discussing?
If the trial was in West Virginia it would be Smith putting on the brakes and getting the news cycle reporting on the trial all the way up to the election knowing he would likely lose no matter what.
And President Trump would be pushing for an expedited trial.
That's what you're not getting. It's ALL political.
And in a few months when it's Biden's turn in the barrel for his impeachment...you'll be arguing my side...that it's nothing but a political persecution and the outcome is already decided.
Translation: Gotta try to lock him up before the election or he might win…….but it’s not about politics.Pretty obvious. If the trial doesn’t occur before the election and Trump wins, then it will be delayed an additional 4 years which would not serve justice.
There is no downside to accelerating the process.
Follow the rules. That's what Jack Smith was told.Jack Smith isn’t political. You are.
Jack Smith isn’t trying to delay the trial in Florida. That is, yet again, Trump.
Your hypothetical assertion is disproven by facts.
What is "ridiculous" are the Liberals trying to GET RID Of President Trump!We all know that Trump’s ridiculous claim of presidential immunity will fail. His supporters are merely praising his ability to abuse the system to their advantage.
No one is delaying the trial. The SCOTUS just refused to expedite it. You people sure are desperate to stop Trump from whooping your collectivist asses. Telling, that.Innocent people don't delay trials. Guilty people do.
Now you'll get see just how fast the 4th circuit works.
Yet again, you guys demonstrate how pathetic you are when you celebrate being able to evade the consequences.Maybe.![]()
Nope. Did you see the news? They told him no! What are you concerned with?You know as well as I do that the Supreme Court is going to hear this case one way or another.
All this ruling does is waste time and increase the likelihood that this trial never happens.
Who benefits from that?
Innocent people don't delay trials. Guilty people do.
Zzz.Now you'll get see just how fast the 4th circuit works.
If he can get to the White House, then he is in charge of the Justice Department and can have all this garbage thrown out!The lower court ruled a president does not have a forever get out of free card. The court ruled they would not rule on that so that is the rule.
The case continues in January. Not really a win for Trump.
Even if the Supreme Court ruled later a president gets a lifelong get out of jail card, it would only be after he had been found guilty.
Non sequitur.Yet again, you guys demonstrate how pathetic you are when you celebrate being able to evade the consequences.
Why do you find that ignorant and dopey? Let’s just get this shit done![]()
Supreme Court Declines to Fast-Track Trump Immunity Case, as Jan. 6 Looms Over 2024 Election — The Wall Street Journal
Trump is trying to mitigate the damage from his legal woes by arguing he’s a proxy for his supportersapple.news
The Special Counsel motion was pretty ignorant.
He is trying to prosecute Trump. Trump says he might seek to appeal it on a legal theory of immunity. So the dopey special counsel tries to get “mother may I?” Permission?
Application DENIED.
![]()
So you’re saying when the appeals court slaps down Trump’s motion, SCOTUS won’t take it.Nope. Did you see the news? They told him no! What are you concerned with?