Breaking News. SCOTUS rejects the premature Special Counsel bid to rule on his cases

[JGalt]

Trump is a serial abuser of the system. He’s made a sport of it. Rich elite assholes often do.

Sucks being poor white trash, doesn't it?

 

[BackAgain]

January 9th the trial starts.

Keep saying your little mantra. Or is it a prayer?

 

[pknopp]

Keep saying your little mantra. Or is it a prayer?

It's quoting the news sources.

 

[BackAgain]

It's quoting the news sources.

Well, that makes it all official.

 

[BS Filter]

Trump is a serial abuser of the system. He’s made a sport of it. Rich elite assholes often do.

Blah blah blah. Jack Smith just got slapped for trying to abuse the system. Idiot.

 

[pknopp]

Well, that makes it all official.

Far more than your rantings.

 

[Marener]

Blah blah blah. Jack Smith just got slapped for trying to abuse the system. Idiot.

How is it abuse?

 

[kyzr]

georgia.
lol ... letitia's case was civil, so you shouldn't even have included that. but anyhoo - it's a done deal.
<snicker> too many flippers, including mark meadows - mean otherwise.
d'oh!
sure.

We'll see. The smart ones said before that Jack Smith had the best cases, Ooooooooops.
Mark Meadows? Yeah, okay. In Federal Court? Fani is in wayyyyyyyyy over her head.
Then Trump's lawyers see Fani's case, again, and again...Trump guilty of questioning an election???

...So Trump has Fani's play book to beat her with, no problemo.

Not sure if you read this far, but Fani's challenges are daunting, and she is ill equipped to deal with them.

Willis also faces the reality that, even if the federal district judge is sympathetic, the removal motions will need to be reviewed on appeal. They involve challenging questions over the scope of not just laws like the Hatch Act but the duties of federal officials like Meadows. That could place those cases on a different trajectory for months.
The trial courts will have to render decisions on major constitutional challenges, including free-speech claims, before trial. However, defendants are generally forced to go to trial before they receive a full appellate review of such questions; since they have not been convicted, it is often viewed as premature to render an appellate decision. These are certainly unprecedented cases that could prompt review, but the defendants cannot count on such an intervention. Yet, while the appellate courts may allow the criminal cases to proceed to verdicts, these severance and removal motions could result in more narrow reviews on the appellate level.

Trump's trial will be the last one, way way out in the future.

 

[Crepitus]

The Special Counsel motion was pretty ignorant.

Why? You know it's going there anyway. This is just another case of them giving tRump what he wants, the delay.

 

[Missourian]

Jack Smith isn’t political. You are.

Jack Smith isn’t trying to delay the trial in Florida. That is, yet again, Trump.

Your hypothetical assertion is disproven by facts.

I don't believe you and I are going to reach consensus on this issue.

I've made my case and I believe it was a good one.

I appreciate the civil discussion.

If we don't interact again before the holiday...have a Merry Christmas.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Trump is a serial abuser of the system. He’s made a sport of it. Rich elite assholes often do.

Says the AI BOT set to PROJECTION

 

[BS Filter]

How is it abuse?

He tried to go around the appeals court. You really aren't equipped for this topic.

 

[Marener]

He tried to go around the appeals court. You really aren't equipped for this topic.

He tried to go above it. How does that abuse the system?

 

[Marener]

I don't believe you and I are going to reach consensus on this issue.

I've made my case and I believe it was a good one.

I appreciate the civil discussion.

If we don't interact again before the holiday...have a Merry Christmas.

I believe I demonstrated your case does not reflect reality.

Take your time coming up with a rebuttal. I can see it isn’t going to be easy.

 

[pknopp]

Why? You know it's going there anyway. This is just another case of them giving tRump what he wants, the delay.

Again, the trial will not be delayed. This does allow Trump to appeal to the Supreme Court if found guilty.

Now if the court had taken it now and said he had immunity there is no case. They didn't.

 

[BS Filter]

He tried to go above it. How does that abuse the system?

What did the Supreme Court tell him?

 

[Missourian]

January 9th the trial starts.

That's the DC Appeals court trial on the question of immunity only.

If they return a verdict that President Trump is immune from prosecution based on his argument that he was acting in his official role as President... which I believe is likely...I don't know that Smith has a basis for appeal. He might...I just don't know

I know that if they rule against the immunity... President Trump can appeal to Scotus.

The question of immunity must be decided to before any other trials can begin.

Like I said previously, Trump has the right to test the validity of his immunity argument against both the appeals court and Scotus just like any other citizen.

 

[Missourian]

I believe I demonstrated your case does not reflect reality.

Take your time coming up with a rebuttal. I can see it isn’t going to be easy.

...and I doubt anything I say will convince you otherwise. I have no interest in going back and forth forever

 

[pknopp]

That's the DC Appeals court trial on the question of immunity only.

The trials start in January. They will be over well before the elections one way or the other.

If they return a verdict that President Trump is immune from prosecution based on his argument that he was acting in his official role as President... which I believe is likely...I don't know that Smith has a basis for appeal. He might...I just don't know

I know that if they rule against the immunity... President Trump can appeal to Scotus.

The question of immunity must be decided to before any other trials can begin.

Like I said previously, Trump has the right to test the validity of his immunity argument against both the appeals court and Scotus just like any other citizen.

If anyone rules anyone is immune from our laws, I hope people start burning things down.

 

[BluesLegend]

That rigged TRump SCOTUS you just crowed about?

Yes we packed the SCOTUS with real justices, you got a problem with that?