rupol2000
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2021
- 18,215
- 2,621
- 138
- Banned
- #1
In fact, Britain bears as much responsibility for the occupation of Palestine as the Jews themselves. Churchill, in alliance with the bloody Stalin, made this decision on occupation, under the pretext of creating a “buffer zone”
It makes sense to consider this together with the case of genocide in Bengal and the destruction of Turkestan with subsequent occupation. This would be a good chance for Ireland to break out of British occupation.
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps’ pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the Star-Spangled Banner, in triumph doth wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
It makes sense to consider this together with the case of genocide in Bengal and the destruction of Turkestan with subsequent occupation. This would be a good chance for Ireland to break out of British occupation.
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps’ pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the Star-Spangled Banner, in triumph doth wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.