Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,402
- 13,674
Far be it from me to think that scientific research is more rational than your groupthink.Yeah, devouring commie propaganda is what you do best. Run along sheeple.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Far be it from me to think that scientific research is more rational than your groupthink.Yeah, devouring commie propaganda is what you do best. Run along sheeple.
.
Far be it from me to think that scientific research is more rational than your groupthink.
ROFLMAOLast year, the House's Coronavirus subcommittee published emails and other communications showing Fauci's own efforts to downplay the lab leak early in the pandemic and pressure researchers to produce a paper to that effect.
I posted the scientific research I’m referring to. You ignored it because it doesn’t say what you want to believe and because you don’t understand it anyway.From post 138, is this the kind of scientific research you're referring to?
As was asked...where does it stop and who gets to decide.
Wrong again commie, it is a reference, to an 800 page congressional report. Just because you need someone to lead you around by the nose, doesn't mean I'm willing to do it. Go find it and look up the report yourself. Or you can just admit you're a lazy, lying POS and just STFU.
.
I don't need help.The longer version is the truth about Covid
Does that help you?
I posted the scientific research I’m referring to. You ignored it because it doesn’t say what you want to believe and because you don’t understand it anyway.
They use data to generate estimates.Scientific research doesn't use estimates, they use verifiable data. And their results can be replicated Once again, you're proving yourself to be stupid.
.
Counter them with the truth. If that does not work, then the people get what they deseve.
You cannot take away freedom to protect freedom
Scientific research doesn't use estimates, they use verifiable data. And their results can be replicated Once again, you're proving yourself to be stupid.
.
View attachment 942506
What's wrong little poopey-pants?
Your inability to do basic posting on a chat board is unsurprising,
As are the lumps in your pants from being unable to properly drop that link.
Since you refuse to comply with proper board etiquette you qualify for your very own
View attachment 942505
There ya go, enjpy
View attachment 942510
Awww...Poor little thing, you're the on throwing a tantrum because you lack the ability to fucking read. Damn child I've already told you what to read and where you can find it. I can't read it for you, because I don't cater to stupid people.
.
They use data to generate estimates.
Wow. You really don’t understand science at all.
Maybe you shouldnt talk shit about this until you have a better understanding of how things work.
Nope. Ever heard of a confidence interval?I think you're confusing scientist with pollsters.
.
Nope. Ever heard of a confidence interval?
It doesn’t sound like it.
You said that science doesn’t deal in estimates.I have, and it's not used to make definitive statements. Which is exactly what your link did.
.
You said that science doesn’t deal in estimates.
Are you going to stand by that statement?
Because that’s exactly what a confidence interval means. It’s an estimate.
This just shows you didn’t even read it before dismissing it. It was included in the study.Yep, because they didn't include their degree of confidence, to have any credibility that would have had to be included, if they were using that method.
.
This just shows you didn’t even read it before dismissing it. It was included in the study.
Here are their results:
View attachment 942583
To have any credibility, you would have read it first.