daveman
Diamond Member
- Jun 25, 2010
- 76,522
- 29,537
You do know "doing stuff leftists don't like" isn't an impeachable offense, right?
So only leftists are concerned about violations of the Constitution and the rule of law. Telling.
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do know "doing stuff leftists don't like" isn't an impeachable offense, right?
So only leftists are concerned about violations of the Constitution and the rule of law. Telling.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/us/politics/16cole.html?_r=2&hp
more proof of the evilness of those two. a special place in hell awaits the both of them
So, you celebrate that they got away with it.You do know you're never going to see a BUSHROVECHENEY perp walk, right?Would you kindly direct us to the part of the article that supports your asssrtion that "bush/cheney used cia to spy on american critics of the war ".
I'll wait.
Do you mean the opening paragraph of the article?
WASHINGTON A former senior C.I.A. official says that officials in the Bush White House sought damaging personal information on a prominent American critic of the Iraq war in order to discredit him. Glenn L. Carle, a former Central Intelligence Agency officer who was a top counterterrorism official during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked intelligence officials to gather sensitive information on Juan Cole, a University of Michigan professor who writes an influential blog that criticized the war.
Is it a crime to use the CIA for the presidents personal agenda or is it just immoral?
Either way, there is already one court ruling against the Bush administration for violating the civil rights of American citizens through spying, how many do we need before we act on the crime?
Link?Too bad Clinton's attorney general threatened FBI and CIA agents with arrest if they shared information and looked into the jihad terrorists attending flight school in the US. Maybe we could have saved 3,000 lives. JFK used the CIA to recruit, train, feed and equip a little army of Cuban exiles. and they still couldn't get it right.
Oh, you mean the crimes they didn't actually commit? Yeah, it's good they weren't hauled off before a kangaroo court of butthurt leftists.So, you celebrate that they got away with it.You do know you're never going to see a BUSHROVECHENEY perp walk, right?Do you mean the opening paragraph of the article?
Is it a crime to use the CIA for the presidents personal agenda or is it just immoral?
Either way, there is already one court ruling against the Bush administration for violating the civil rights of American citizens through spying, how many do we need before we act on the crime?
So why do you give Obama a pass for extending the Patriot Act?
Who is giving him a "pass"?
Enough House and Senate Democrats to pass the thing.
I haven't heard a lot of fussing in the media, either.
You do know you're never going to see a BUSHROVECHENEY perp walk, right?Would you kindly direct us to the part of the article that supports your asssrtion that "bush/cheney used cia to spy on american critics of the war ".
I'll wait.
Do you mean the opening paragraph of the article?
WASHINGTON A former senior C.I.A. official says that officials in the Bush White House sought damaging personal information on a prominent American critic of the Iraq war in order to discredit him. Glenn L. Carle, a former Central Intelligence Agency officer who was a top counterterrorism official during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked intelligence officials to gather sensitive information on Juan Cole, a University of Michigan professor who writes an influential blog that criticized the war.
Is it a crime to use the CIA for the presidents personal agenda or is it just immoral?
Either way, there is already one court ruling against the Bush administration for violating the civil rights of American citizens through spying, how many do we need before we act on the crime?
Link?Too bad Clinton's attorney general threatened FBI and CIA agents with arrest if they shared information and looked into the jihad terrorists attending flight school in the US. Maybe we could have saved 3,000 lives. JFK used the CIA to recruit, train, feed and equip a little army of Cuban exiles. and they still couldn't get it right.
Link?Too bad Clinton's attorney general threatened FBI and CIA agents with arrest if they shared information and looked into the jihad terrorists attending flight school in the US. Maybe we could have saved 3,000 lives. JFK used the CIA to recruit, train, feed and equip a little army of Cuban exiles. and they still couldn't get it right.
Clinton and Bin Laden
And if he doesn't? "Oh, well, we tried -- and we'll still vote for him!"Who is giving him a "pass"?
Enough House and Senate Democrats to pass the thing.
I haven't heard a lot of fussing in the media, either.
There were enough House and Senate Democrats to pass the thing the first time. Liberals are not giving the President a "pass" on the Patriot Act. We will continue to express our displeasure about it and pressure him to do something about it.
Well, except for the previous Administration.That doesn't mean that I throw the baby out with the bathwater. This President has been able to accomplish great things, despite incredible obstructionism...the like of which has never been seen in US politics.
Like I said: If he doesn't change, you'll still roll over for him.I still support him, but by no means does that equate to "giving a pass".
Why would the corporate media "fuss" over such a thing? The actual liberal media does...Just check Mother Jones or The Nation...
You do know you're never going to see a BUSHROVECHENEY perp walk, right?Do you mean the opening paragraph of the article?
Is it a crime to use the CIA for the presidents personal agenda or is it just immoral?
Either way, there is already one court ruling against the Bush administration for violating the civil rights of American citizens through spying, how many do we need before we act on the crime?
And how does that make you feel? Goosebumps?
You do know you're never going to see a BUSHROVECHENEY perp walk, right?
And how does that make you feel? Goosebumps?
No, no tingles down my leg. It's just good to see that the justice system wasn't perverted over sissy bedwetter leftist butthurt.![]()
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/us/politics/16cole.html?_r=2&hp
more proof of the evilness of those two. a special place in hell awaits the both of them
Would you kindly direct us to the part of the article that supports your asssrtion that "bush/cheney used cia to spy on american critics of the war ".
I'll wait.
Do you mean the opening paragraph of the article?
WASHINGTON A former senior C.I.A. official says that officials in the Bush White House sought damaging personal information on a prominent American critic of the Iraq war in order to discredit him. Glenn L. Carle, a former Central Intelligence Agency officer who was a top counterterrorism official during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked intelligence officials to gather sensitive information on Juan Cole, a University of Michigan professor who writes an influential blog that criticized the war.
Is it a crime to use the CIA for the presidents personal agenda or is it just immoral?
Either way, there is already one court ruling against the Bush administration for violating the civil rights of American citizens through spying, how many do we need before we act on the crime?
And if he doesn't? "Oh, well, we tried -- and we'll still vote for him!"Enough House and Senate Democrats to pass the thing.
I haven't heard a lot of fussing in the media, either.
There were enough House and Senate Democrats to pass the thing the first time. Liberals are not giving the President a "pass" on the Patriot Act. We will continue to express our displeasure about it and pressure him to do something about it.
Well, except for the previous Administration.
Like I said: If he doesn't change, you'll still roll over for him.I still support him, but by no means does that equate to "giving a pass".
Why would the corporate media "fuss" over such a thing? The actual liberal media does...Just check Mother Jones or The Nation...![]()
And if he doesn't? "Oh, well, we tried -- and we'll still vote for him!"There were enough House and Senate Democrats to pass the thing the first time. Liberals are not giving the President a "pass" on the Patriot Act. We will continue to express our displeasure about it and pressure him to do something about it.
Well, except for the previous Administration.
Like I said: If he doesn't change, you'll still roll over for him.
Why would the corporate media "fuss" over such a thing? The actual liberal media does...Just check Mother Jones or The Nation...![]()
So you've agreed 100% with everything a President YOU supported did? That's ludicrous...
And how does that make you feel? Goosebumps?
No, no tingles down my leg. It's just good to see that the justice system wasn't perverted over sissy bedwetter leftist butthurt.![]()
Unlike spending $70 million of your money on a blowjob, right?
Indeed it is. And if my disagreement with him was serious enough, I wouldn't vote for him again.And if he doesn't? "Oh, well, we tried -- and we'll still vote for him!"There were enough House and Senate Democrats to pass the thing the first time. Liberals are not giving the President a "pass" on the Patriot Act. We will continue to express our displeasure about it and pressure him to do something about it.
Well, except for the previous Administration.
Like I said: If he doesn't change, you'll still roll over for him.
Why would the corporate media "fuss" over such a thing? The actual liberal media does...Just check Mother Jones or The Nation...![]()
So you've agreed 100% with everything a President YOU supported did? That's ludicrous...
Then perhaps you need to stop engaging in it.And if he doesn't? "Oh, well, we tried -- and we'll still vote for him!"
Well, except for the previous Administration.
Like I said: If he doesn't change, you'll still roll over for him.
![]()
So you've agreed 100% with everything a President YOU supported did? That's ludicrous...
Partisan hackery always is
No, no tingles down my leg. It's just good to see that the justice system wasn't perverted over sissy bedwetter leftist butthurt.![]()
Unlike spending $70 million of your money on a blowjob, right?
1. It wasn't about a blowjob.
2. Since when have liberals ever complained about spending taxpayers' money?![]()
Then perhaps you need to stop engaging in it.So you've agreed 100% with everything a President YOU supported did? That's ludicrous...
Partisan hackery always is