Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
Sounds great........................but....we don't know who we're backing or the end game, is ghadafi to be taken into custody?, who controls Libya?, who gets the spoils?, OIL. And a whole encylopedia of unknowns. Major mistakes again.
Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
Sounds great........................but....we don't know who we're backing or the end game, is ghadafi to be taken into custody?, who controls Libya?, who gets the spoils?, OIL. And a whole encylopedia of unknowns. Major mistakes again.
The same is true of Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Japan, Germany, Vietnam, the Soviet Union, and every other situation in human history.
Republicans supporting Kadaffy is fun to see though.
Obama was very clear during his campaign for President that the Iraq war and Gitmo were responsible for creating terrorists. A main point was that Iraq never attacked us.
Well, Gitmo is still open and Libya never attacked us, and Obama is blowing the crap out of them. Meanwhile...........The left is eerily silent.
Obama was very clear during his campaign for President that the Iraq war and Gitmo were responsible for creating terrorists. A main point was that Iraq never attacked us.
Well, Gitmo is still open and Libya never attacked us, and Obama is blowing the crap out of them. Meanwhile...........The left is eerily silent.
Where are you guys getting your talking points from? HuffPo? John Stewart?Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
Where are you guys getting your talking points from? HuffPo? John Stewart?Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
U.S. begins missile assault against Libyan air defenses | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com
Where are you guys getting your talking points from? HuffPo? John Stewart?Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
U.S. begins missile assault against Libyan air defenses | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com
Straight out of their asses. What is our exit strategy ? ----quick !
Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
Yet that's all the press and Liberals asked Bush. Which one of you is man enough to ask Obama?Where are you guys getting your talking points from? HuffPo? John Stewart?
U.S. begins missile assault against Libyan air defenses | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com
Straight out of their asses. What is our exit strategy ? ----quick !
No need for an exit strategy when you do it right.
Did we need an exit strategy for the Balkans?
Did we need one for Kuwait?
Will we need one for Libya?
No.
That's the point. When you do it right, it works.
When you don't, you need an exit strategy.
Yet that's all the press and Liberals asked Bush. Which one of you is man enough to ask Obama?Straight out of their asses. What is our exit strategy ? ----quick !
No need for an exit strategy when you do it right.
Did we need an exit strategy for the Balkans?
Did we need one for Kuwait?
Will we need one for Libya?
No.
That's the point. When you do it right, it works.
When you don't, you need an exit strategy.
None of you.
Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
Like George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, Obama has done things the correct way.
Have the correct intel, get the support of our allies, set achievable goals, and be on the right side.
Sounds great........................but....we don't know who we're backing or the end game, is ghadafi to be taken into custody?, who controls Libya?, who gets the spoils?, OIL. And a whole encylopedia of unknowns. Major mistakes again.
The same is true of Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Japan, Germany, Vietnam, the Soviet Union, and every other situation in human history.
Republicans supporting Kadaffy is fun to see though.
Be on the right side? Obama seems to be aiding people that have ties to Al-Qaeda, not sure how that is the right side, but I am willing to listen to your defense of it being so. Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who oppressed his people, murdered them, and even used chemical weapons on them. I fail to see how going after him is being on the wrong side.
Obama was very clear during his campaign for President that the Iraq war and Gitmo were responsible for creating terrorists. A main point was that Iraq never attacked us.
Well, Gitmo is still open and Libya never attacked us, and Obama is blowing the crap out of them. Meanwhile...........The left is eerily silent.
Like I said...
Get the support of your allies, have good intel, and achievable goals.
Clinton won the war in the Balkans without losing a single American soldier.
Bush Sr. got the support of almost all the industrialized nations for the Gulf War, even the Japanese.
It's called diplomacy. It works really well when you use it.
Oh really? From March 3rd:No American troops are going into Libya by the way.
You know what Marines do right?Some 400 US Marines arrived at an American naval base in Greece in a buildup of U.S. forces around revolt-torn Libya, even as European governments shied away Thursday from possible military action.
Oh, it's not on top of the list, that's much better. They couldn't be lying, or the troops couldn't already be in there blowing shit up in advance as they were in Gulf War I and Gulf War II.White House press secretary Jay Carney on Monday said deploying ground troops is not at the top of the list when it comes to potential responses to the ongoing violence in Libya, but he said its one of many options being considered.No option has been removed from the table, but ground troops is not sort of top of the list at this point, Mr. Carney told reporters.
Well, then I'm sure Obama would get authorization from Congress wouldn't he? I mean, he wouldn't do like Bush did and skirt the War Powers Act would he? What do John Stewart and HuffPo say about that?More than 60 percent of U.S. voters want the United States to maintain a hands-off approach to the Libyan crisis, even as government officials discuss possible military intervention in the Mediterranean country ripped asunder in a rebellion against longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi.
Obama was very clear during his campaign for President that the Iraq war and Gitmo were responsible for creating terrorists. A main point was that Iraq never attacked us.
Well, Gitmo is still open and Libya never attacked us, and Obama is blowing the crap out of them. Meanwhile...........The left is eerily silent.
Like I said...
Get the support of your allies, have good intel, and achievable goals.
Clinton won the war in the Balkans without losing a single American soldier.
Bush Sr. got the support of almost all the industrialized nations for the Gulf War, even the Japanese.
It's called diplomacy. It works really well when you use it.
Looks like cowardice to me. Looks like the USA is not going to be a leader until we have one again.