Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And fill the reservoirs with what? There's a drought. That means no rain.You are all so gifted and wise. Please explain the brilliant Republican Teabagger Conservative Christian Creationist plan for dealing with record droughts.
You build reservoirs, dipshit.
WASHINGTON -- President Obama will announce millions of dollars in federal drought assistance Friday when he flies to California and tours fields and orchards ravaged by the deepening water crisis, aides said.
Obama to announce millions of dollars for drought assistance - latimes.com
And fill the reservoirs with what? There's a drought. That means no rain.You build reservoirs, dipshit.
So fill the reservoirs with water from the Pacific. Pump water from the Pacific, send it through a desalination plant, then a water treatment plant and then put it in the reservoirs.
But then it makes too much sense, so Libturds won't go for it. And also it might endanger some other puny little rat turdling's nest, so then it won't be accepted by the environmentalst weenies.
And fill the reservoirs with what? There's a drought. That means no rain.
So fill the reservoirs with water from the Pacific. Pump water from the Pacific, send it through a desalination plant, then a water treatment plant and then put it in the reservoirs.
But then it makes too much sense, so Libturds won't go for it. And also it might endanger some other puny little rat turdling's nest, so then it won't be accepted by the environmentalst weenies.
That's what certain intelligent people wanted to do LAST drought. Then it rained and the democrats said there was no more need. As if a drought would never happen again.
WASHINGTON -- President Obama will announce millions of dollars in federal drought assistance Friday when he flies to California and tours fields and orchards ravaged by the deepening water crisis, aides said.
Obama to announce millions of dollars for drought assistance - latimes.com
So...how is millions of dollars going to make it rain?
Why do the anti-science conservative posters never bother to provide links to hard evidence to support their conspiracy theories .
Oh, yeah Never mind.
Why do the anti-science conservative posters never bother to provide links to hard evidence to support their conspiracy theories .
Oh, yeah Never mind.
Are you implying that Republicans have a plan for dealing with a five-year drought? You assholes can't even admit that the Greenhouse Effect is real. Why do you think that the weather is continually getting more chaotic year after year? Record hear, record cold, record droughts, record floods, record pollution, and your brilliant plan to fix it is to build another oil pipeline.You do know that HotAir.com is bullshit, right? "Sean Hannity covered this story on his show last night." That means it's wrong.
Then you should have no problem proving that California did not have a plan in place to deal with a drought of up to 5 years.
Video: The valley hope forgot. POSTED AT 3:35 PM ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 BY ED MORRISSEY
That would be the San Joaquin Valley in California, one of the most prolific agricultural areas in the country or at least it was, until environmentalists turned off the water. Did they need it for people in response to the drought? No, because the water that would normally flow to the SJV is getting directed out to sea instead. Environmentalists have chosen to bankrupt an entire ecosystem of farms in favor of protecting the Delta smelt, a three-inch fish that neither feeds people nor eliminates pests from the water system. LINK
Actually, the problem for Central Valley farmers is that their water got taken from them by a federal judge, who put a baitfish ahead of human beings. Central Valleys water-management system was designed to deal with droughts that last as long as five years, but the reservoirs that held its lifeblood got emptied into the ocean to rescue the Delta smelt.....
In fact, Obama threatened to veto a bill that would have resolved this situation almost exactly two years ago. Instead, Obama insisted that the environmentalists needed to keep channeling water away from this rich agricultural resource and from the farmers who had worked it for generations, thanks to their own engineering genius at defeating droughts, to pour that water into the Pacific Ocean instead. LINK
You are all so gifted and wise. Please explain the brilliant Republican Teabagger Conservative Christian Creationist plan for dealing with record droughts.
You build reservoirs, dipshit.
And fill the reservoirs with what? There's a drought. That means no rain.You are all so gifted and wise. Please explain the brilliant Republican Teabagger Conservative Christian Creationist plan for dealing with record droughts.
You build reservoirs, dipshit.
Creationist Teabagger Christian Conservatives who deny science are not going to come up with a solution to the Greenhouse Effect.
Why do the anti-science conservative posters never bother to provide links to hard evidence to support their conspiracy theories….
Oh, yeah… Never mind.
Absolute Pubcrappe as always...this is the worst drought since they've kept records...and I love smelt. lol
Absolute Pubcrappe as always...this is the worst drought since they've kept records...and I love smelt. lol
It's not California's worst drought ever. That's bullshit. This one is only three years old.
Researchers have documented multiple droughts in California that lasted 10 or 20 years in a row during the past 1,000 years.
SAN JOSE, Calif. California's current drought is being billed as the driest period in the state's recorded rainfall history.
But scientists who study the West's long-term climate patterns say the state has been parched for much longer stretches before that 163-year historical period began.
And they worry that the "megadroughts" typical of California's earlier history could come again.
Through studies of tree rings, sediment and other natural evidence, researchers have documented multiple droughts in California that lasted 10 or 20 years in a row during the past 1,000 years compared to the mere three-year duration of the current dry spell.
The two most severe megadroughts make the Dust Bowl of the 1930s look tame: a 240-year-long drought that started in 850 and, 50 years after the conclusion of that one, another that stretched at least 180 years.
"We continue to run California as if the longest drought we are ever going to encounter is about seven years," said Scott Stine, a professor of geography and environmental studies at Cal State East Bay. "We're living in a dream world."
Scientists: Past California droughts have lasted 200 years
Absolute Pubcrappe as always...this is the worst drought since they've kept records...and I love smelt. lol
It's not California's worst drought ever. That's bullshit. This one is only three years old.
Researchers have documented multiple droughts in California that lasted 10 or 20 years in a row during the past 1,000 years.
SAN JOSE, Calif. California's current drought is being billed as the driest period in the state's recorded rainfall history.
But scientists who study the West's long-term climate patterns say the state has been parched for much longer stretches before that 163-year historical period began.
And they worry that the "megadroughts" typical of California's earlier history could come again.
Through studies of tree rings, sediment and other natural evidence, researchers have documented multiple droughts in California that lasted 10 or 20 years in a row during the past 1,000 years compared to the mere three-year duration of the current dry spell.
The two most severe megadroughts make the Dust Bowl of the 1930s look tame: a 240-year-long drought that started in 850 and, 50 years after the conclusion of that one, another that stretched at least 180 years.
"We continue to run California as if the longest drought we are ever going to encounter is about seven years," said Scott Stine, a professor of geography and environmental studies at Cal State East Bay. "We're living in a dream world."
Scientists: Past California droughts have lasted 200 years
Doesn't count, there wasn't anyone there taking pictures, and climate change has to be making things worse or we won't do anything about it.
Funny thing, if the climate in California ever actually changes droughts will be few and far between, not a common occurrence, but it is still the fault of climate change that we got this drought.
Plus, being a conservative, you never post links with facts to back up your claims, so this can't actually be true.
I love the way you guys have zero ability to think a problem all the way through. I don't know why you behave this way. Is it because you just want to through mud or is it because you lack the ability to have two thoughts in your mind at the same time?The government has emptied reservoirs to try to resuscitate a salmon run that disappeared 60 years ago. That water should have been saved so that it would be available during a drought.
But the enviro-freakshow doesn't care about people.
Why do the anti-science conservative posters never bother to provide links to hard evidence to support their conspiracy theories .
Oh, yeah Never mind.
Gerbils and Smelt......which do you like up there more?
I love the way you guys have zero ability to think a problem all the way through. I don't know why you behave this way. Is it because you just want to through mud or is it because you lack the ability to have two thoughts in your mind at the same time?The government has emptied reservoirs to try to resuscitate a salmon run that disappeared 60 years ago. That water should have been saved so that it would be available during a drought.
But the enviro-freakshow doesn't care about people.
Suppose they are able to "resuscitate a salmon run." Besides the salmon, who else would benefit from the salmon returning. How about the rebirth of a tourism to the area? Did it occur to you that if the salmon come back the fishermen would also come back. Motels, restaruants, gas stations, and various stores would all profit by a return of the salmon. How about the locals? Would they profit by being able to supplement their food supply from the local river. Seems to me you would want a solution that benefits the local in town and the farmers in the area.
