Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From SB-1424:
SECTION 1.
Title 14.5 (commencing with Section 3085) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
TITLE 14.5. False Information Strategic Plans
3085.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
I don't know what regulatory or enforcement provisions or penalties would be included. I does seem like "the state" would have some kind of penal authority.
Yikes. We'll see.
Source: Bill Text - SB-1424 Internet: social media: false information: strategic plan.
.
No it doesn't say that.From SB-1424:
SECTION 1.
Title 14.5 (commencing with Section 3085) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
TITLE 14.5. False Information Strategic Plans
3085.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
I don't know what regulatory or enforcement provisions or penalties would be included. I does seem like "the state" would have some kind of penal authority.
Yikes. We'll see.
Source: Bill Text - SB-1424 Internet: social media: false information: strategic plan.
.
Where?
This states that social media sites have to act with some civic responsibility... They have the same kind of laws for kiddy fuckers...
This is weak at best... All face book has to show is one guy saying he checking shit out...
This just says, stop working for the Russians...
silly. I did.The state bill is linked from the article. Like many websites, Gateway Pundit merely reports news stories reported by other sources.Gateway Pundit...
Lets just stop here.... It's bullshit unless we have a serious source....
This is a clear attempt by government to control the media...and we know leftists will shut down opposing views, which is exactly what they are doing right now on YouTube, Facebook, and other media outlets.
Read the fucking bill, idiot.... Stop being a force fed chicken and actually do some fucking work....
butbutbutt, the dems are for free speech!!Far-left California state senator Richard Pan wants to force all websites to submit to state-approved fact checking
Pan recently introduced legislation to crack down on free speech on the internet.
Pan’s legislation would force online publishers to utilize state-sanctioned fact checkers to approve content before it is posted online.
It targets social media based in California. But as you read the bill, you see it appears to define social media as any Internet blog, website, or communication. (It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content)
Even if the bill "only" targeted social media, it would still be thoroughly fascist and anti-American. Th
No it doesn't say that.From SB-1424:
SECTION 1.
Title 14.5 (commencing with Section 3085) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
TITLE 14.5. False Information Strategic Plans
3085.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
I don't know what regulatory or enforcement provisions or penalties would be included. I does seem like "the state" would have some kind of penal authority.
Yikes. We'll see.
Source: Bill Text - SB-1424 Internet: social media: false information: strategic plan.
.
Where?
This states that social media sites have to act with some civic responsibility... They have the same kind of laws for kiddy fuckers...
This is weak at best... All face book has to show is one guy saying he checking shit out...
This just says, stop working for the Russians...
Why write and pass a bill unless there will be authority to enforce it?
.
Okay, encouragement is one thing. I'm all for corporate responsibility.No it doesn't say that.From SB-1424:
SECTION 1.
Title 14.5 (commencing with Section 3085) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
TITLE 14.5. False Information Strategic Plans
3085.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
I don't know what regulatory or enforcement provisions or penalties would be included. I does seem like "the state" would have some kind of penal authority.
Yikes. We'll see.
Source: Bill Text - SB-1424 Internet: social media: false information: strategic plan.
.
Where?
This states that social media sites have to act with some civic responsibility... They have the same kind of laws for kiddy fuckers...
This is weak at best... All face book has to show is one guy saying he checking shit out...
This just says, stop working for the Russians...
Why write and pass a bill unless there will be authority to enforce it?
.
This is done all the time to encourage corporate responsibility... It is especially prevalent in IT where data is involved...
I actually know the law around data but I can tell you that a vast majority of IT professionals don't... This leads to cringe worthy moments...
This allows someone to stand up in a room in Facebook and say whats our policy if we are the avenue to undermine democracy in the USA.
butbutbutt, the dems are for free speech!!Far-left California state senator Richard Pan wants to force all websites to submit to state-approved fact checking
Pan recently introduced legislation to crack down on free speech on the internet.
Pan’s legislation would force online publishers to utilize state-sanctioned fact checkers to approve content before it is posted online.
It targets social media based in California. But as you read the bill, you see it appears to define social media as any Internet blog, website, or communication. (It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content)
Even if the bill "only" targeted social media, it would still be thoroughly fascist and anti-American. Th
they would never pass laws that have people get government approval to speeches or books or news
no never
pfft
fucking commies
why do you want to give up your Constitutional rights?butbutbutt, the dems are for free speech!!Far-left California state senator Richard Pan wants to force all websites to submit to state-approved fact checking
Pan recently introduced legislation to crack down on free speech on the internet.
Pan’s legislation would force online publishers to utilize state-sanctioned fact checkers to approve content before it is posted online.
It targets social media based in California. But as you read the bill, you see it appears to define social media as any Internet blog, website, or communication. (It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content)
Even if the bill "only" targeted social media, it would still be thoroughly fascist and anti-American. Th
they would never pass laws that have people get government approval to speeches or books or news
no never
pfft
fucking commies
This is about the orchestrated and deliberate spreading of false information with the agenda to undermine the US...
Wake the fuck up... 14 intelligence agencies say your in a cyberwar with Russia and you want to roll over stick your tummy in the air and say tickle me....
This law would not fix everything but it is a line of defence...
Why do the nay sayers hate America... Why do you want the enemy to win?
Okay, encouragement is one thing. I'm all for corporate responsibility.No it doesn't say that.From SB-1424:
SECTION 1.
Title 14.5 (commencing with Section 3085) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
TITLE 14.5. False Information Strategic Plans
3085.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
I don't know what regulatory or enforcement provisions or penalties would be included. I does seem like "the state" would have some kind of penal authority.
Yikes. We'll see.
Source: Bill Text - SB-1424 Internet: social media: false information: strategic plan.
.
Where?
This states that social media sites have to act with some civic responsibility... They have the same kind of laws for kiddy fuckers...
This is weak at best... All face book has to show is one guy saying he checking shit out...
This just says, stop working for the Russians...
Why write and pass a bill unless there will be authority to enforce it?
.
This is done all the time to encourage corporate responsibility... It is especially prevalent in IT where data is involved...
I actually know the law around data but I can tell you that a vast majority of IT professionals don't... This leads to cringe worthy moments...
This allows someone to stand up in a room in Facebook and say whats our policy if we are the avenue to undermine democracy in the USA.
But why write and pass a bill if the state is not going to enforce it?
.
I'm not sure what you mean by "the enemy" - Other countries or the conservatives. Since I'm not ideological (which may be the cause of my being reasonable), I'm never quite sure on that.Okay, encouragement is one thing. I'm all for corporate responsibility.No it doesn't say that.From SB-1424:
SECTION 1.
Title 14.5 (commencing with Section 3085) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
TITLE 14.5. False Information Strategic Plans
3085.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
I don't know what regulatory or enforcement provisions or penalties would be included. I does seem like "the state" would have some kind of penal authority.
Yikes. We'll see.
Source: Bill Text - SB-1424 Internet: social media: false information: strategic plan.
.
Where?
This states that social media sites have to act with some civic responsibility... They have the same kind of laws for kiddy fuckers...
This is weak at best... All face book has to show is one guy saying he checking shit out...
This just says, stop working for the Russians...
Why write and pass a bill unless there will be authority to enforce it?
.
This is done all the time to encourage corporate responsibility... It is especially prevalent in IT where data is involved...
I actually know the law around data but I can tell you that a vast majority of IT professionals don't... This leads to cringe worthy moments...
This allows someone to stand up in a room in Facebook and say whats our policy if we are the avenue to undermine democracy in the USA.
But why write and pass a bill if the state is not going to enforce it?
.
Cause there is a cyberwar on... Mac, you seem reasonable, why help the enemy...
Truth is Russia got away with it in 2016... And there seems next to nothing in place for 2018 and the have got better...
The other thing is North Korea, Iran, etc.... has seen the US weakness and know there is no blowback for exploiting America this way...
There has been a failure to instruct the Generals, they say they are trying to defend but the laws aren't up to date and they aren't allowed to play offence...
Far-left California state senator Richard Pan wants to force all websites to submit to state-approved fact checking
Pan recently introduced legislation to crack down on free speech on the internet.
Pan’s legislation would force online publishers to utilize state-sanctioned fact checkers to approve content before it is posted online.
It targets social media based in California. But as you read the bill, you see it appears to define social media as any Internet blog, website, or communication. (It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content)
Even if the bill "only" targeted social media, it would still be thoroughly fascist and anti-American. Th
Far-left California state senator Richard Pan wants to force all websites to submit to state-approved fact checking
Pan recently introduced legislation to crack down on free speech on the internet.
Pan’s legislation would force online publishers to utilize state-sanctioned fact checkers to approve content before it is posted online.
It targets social media based in California. But as you read the bill, you see it appears to define social media as any Internet blog, website, or communication. (It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content)
Even if the bill "only" targeted social media, it would still be thoroughly fascist and anti-American. Th
I'm not sure what you mean by "the enemy" - Other countries or the conservatives. Since I'm not ideological (which may be the cause of my being reasonable), I'm never quite sure on that.Okay, encouragement is one thing. I'm all for corporate responsibility.No it doesn't say that.Where?
This states that social media sites have to act with some civic responsibility... They have the same kind of laws for kiddy fuckers...
This is weak at best... All face book has to show is one guy saying he checking shit out...
This just says, stop working for the Russians...
Why write and pass a bill unless there will be authority to enforce it?
.
This is done all the time to encourage corporate responsibility... It is especially prevalent in IT where data is involved...
I actually know the law around data but I can tell you that a vast majority of IT professionals don't... This leads to cringe worthy moments...
This allows someone to stand up in a room in Facebook and say whats our policy if we are the avenue to undermine democracy in the USA.
But why write and pass a bill if the state is not going to enforce it?
.
Cause there is a cyberwar on... Mac, you seem reasonable, why help the enemy...
Truth is Russia got away with it in 2016... And there seems next to nothing in place for 2018 and the have got better...
The other thing is North Korea, Iran, etc.... has seen the US weakness and know there is no blowback for exploiting America this way...
There has been a failure to instruct the Generals, they say they are trying to defend but the laws aren't up to date and they aren't allowed to play offence...
I'm a freedom of expression purist, and I'm concerned any time there is a move to control it.
I'm not at all convinced that this is about national security, or just about national security. These are hyper-political times.
.
To believe as you do that government is benevolent, is laughable. You really need to check yourself.I'm not sure what you mean by "the enemy" - Other countries or the conservatives. Since I'm not ideological (which may be the cause of my being reasonable), I'm never quite sure on that.Okay, encouragement is one thing. I'm all for corporate responsibility.No it doesn't say that.
Why write and pass a bill unless there will be authority to enforce it?
.
This is done all the time to encourage corporate responsibility... It is especially prevalent in IT where data is involved...
I actually know the law around data but I can tell you that a vast majority of IT professionals don't... This leads to cringe worthy moments...
This allows someone to stand up in a room in Facebook and say whats our policy if we are the avenue to undermine democracy in the USA.
But why write and pass a bill if the state is not going to enforce it?
.
Cause there is a cyberwar on... Mac, you seem reasonable, why help the enemy...
Truth is Russia got away with it in 2016... And there seems next to nothing in place for 2018 and the have got better...
The other thing is North Korea, Iran, etc.... has seen the US weakness and know there is no blowback for exploiting America this way...
There has been a failure to instruct the Generals, they say they are trying to defend but the laws aren't up to date and they aren't allowed to play offence...
I'm a freedom of expression purist, and I'm concerned any time there is a move to control it.
I'm not at all convinced that this is about national security, or just about national security. These are hyper-political times.
.
Mac,
I am talking about other countries or factions.... Not the conservatives who I believe the real ones are actually concerned about external interference in the election from other countries...
But the Russians just showed a blue print... Corporations could be doing this on individuals as well... No every Corporation is that ethical and imagine if a corporation could pollute a town and then construct online campaigns to vilify them so they can save money. This is trying to make that some what illegal, today it is legal.
I under stand your love for freedom of expression but unfortunately that has been heavily abused to the point that people are struggling to understand the truth (look at some of the polls) due information overload....
Something has to be done... I would welcome other suggestions as I don't like curbing freedom of expression either... But tidal wave of false information has got to the point where a large percentage of people consider info wars a credible source and CNN as the fake news... Actually one guy here yesterday said RT (Russian Television) was far better source than network tv or newspapers, seriously...
Asking for truth should be a corner stone of democracy...
china approves.Far-left California state senator Richard Pan wants to force all websites to submit to state-approved fact checking
Pan recently introduced legislation to crack down on free speech on the internet.
Pan’s legislation would force online publishers to utilize state-sanctioned fact checkers to approve content before it is posted online.
It targets social media based in California. But as you read the bill, you see it appears to define social media as any Internet blog, website, or communication. (It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content)
Even if the bill "only" targeted social media, it would still be thoroughly fascist and anti-American. Th
like 8 years of exploiting obama? hell he sent them billions in the night on a pallet or 2. that type of exploiting is still going on?Okay, encouragement is one thing. I'm all for corporate responsibility.No it doesn't say that.From SB-1424:
SECTION 1.
Title 14.5 (commencing with Section 3085) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
TITLE 14.5. False Information Strategic Plans
3085.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
I don't know what regulatory or enforcement provisions or penalties would be included. I does seem like "the state" would have some kind of penal authority.
Yikes. We'll see.
Source: Bill Text - SB-1424 Internet: social media: false information: strategic plan.
.
Where?
This states that social media sites have to act with some civic responsibility... They have the same kind of laws for kiddy fuckers...
This is weak at best... All face book has to show is one guy saying he checking shit out...
This just says, stop working for the Russians...
Why write and pass a bill unless there will be authority to enforce it?
.
This is done all the time to encourage corporate responsibility... It is especially prevalent in IT where data is involved...
I actually know the law around data but I can tell you that a vast majority of IT professionals don't... This leads to cringe worthy moments...
This allows someone to stand up in a room in Facebook and say whats our policy if we are the avenue to undermine democracy in the USA.
But why write and pass a bill if the state is not going to enforce it?
.
Cause there is a cyberwar on... Mac, you seem reasonable, why help the enemy...
Truth is Russia got away with it in 2016... And there seems next to nothing in place for 2018 and the have got better...
The other thing is North Korea, Iran, etc.... has seen the US weakness and know there is no blowback for exploiting America this way...
There has been a failure to instruct the Generals, they say they are trying to defend but the laws aren't up to date and they aren't allowed to play offence...
Gateway Pundit...
Again, the narrative as usual is bullshit... Where in the bill does it state 'State sanctioned fact checkers'....
Lets help, it doesn't but this OP figures that the army of Alt Right will fill this thread up with there usual back me up bullshit...
Truth is the casualty
