SmarterThanTheAverageBear
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 29,410
- 4,280
- 280
- Banned
- #281
ROFL! Holding up the Constitution is your argument? Really? Now it's unpatriotic to criticize the Post Office?
Here's a clue for you, moron: The Constitution allows the federal government to run the Post Office. It doesn't require it to run the Post Office. It also doesn't require the federal government to grant a legal monopoly to the Post Office.
Even if the Constitution did require the federal government to run the Post Office, that doesn't make it a good idea.
BTW, Saudi Arabia has a government run Post Office, just like the USA.
Your argument couldn't be more wrong, irrelevant or downright stupid.
I would argue that the federal government MUST operate the post office.
If you read the COTUS it lists certain powers of the federal government and then says all other powers belong to the states or the people. Meaning the POST OFFICE MUST remain with the federal government.
Of course if you read the COTUS that specifically, you must wonder how states are empowered to build roads at all, clearly postal roads are the responsibility of the federal government.
Nope. A "power" is the legal authority to do something. It's not a requirement to do anything.
Oh really? So if I were to say do a little digging around I wouldn't find any postings where you are bitching about Obama not doing anything to defend our southern border?
MMMM I think I would find that you HAVE been bitiching about that.....
That's not a power. It's a legal requirement. Obama swore an oath to uphold the laws of the United States. That includes our immigration laws.
Did you seriously just say that?
Here is the text in reference to both the Postal roads
Section. 8.
The Congress shall have Power
To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
Now if you would be so kind, please point me to the section of the cotus requiring the federal government to prevent people from entering this country.