Cannon strikes again.

[berg80]

Will Cannon Even Rule On It?

This happened late Friday before the holiday weekend so I’m assuming many of you didn’t see it: In the Mar-a-Lago case, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to modify the terms of Donald Trump’s release, asking the court to prohibit him from further attacks on federal law enforcement.

The latest parry arises from Trump’s blatantly false and highly incendiary claims that President Biden effectively ordered Trump’s assassination by dispatching a FBI kill team to do the Mar-a-Lago search. It’s batshit crazy stuff, and Smith is asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon … sigh … to order a stop to it.

It’s not a gag order per se; it’s a modification of Trump’s terms of release, which keeps him out of jail pending trial. So it doesn’t have the same First Amendment issues that might accompany any order against a non-criminal defendant.

Yesterday, Trump filed a big, over-the-top response, asking for Smith’s motion to be stricken and any DOJ lawyers associated with its filing be sanctioned.

In a normal case, this would be set up a big showdown in front of Cannon – and either side might end up appealing her ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is of course not a normal case. Cannon’s M.O. so far has been simply not ruling on pending motions. Hard to have a showdown in front of the judge when the judge is a no show.
New Trouble Is Brewing In The Mar-a-Lago Case

Judge declines to bar Trump from making comments about law enforcement

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday refused a request by prosecutors to impose a gag order barring Donald Trump from making inflammatory comments about law enforcement, after Trump's campaign falsely claimed the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during its search of his Florida estate.
Special Counsel Jack Smith previously asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to modify the Republican presidential candidate's conditions of release, saying his "false and inflammatory" comments about the FBI could subject the bureau and trial witnesses to "threats, violence and harassment."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...ng-comments-about-law-enforcement-2024-05-28/

Smith should have asked the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon months ago. This, after her second, highly prejudicial ruling in Trump's favor was slapped down. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Ha ha, sucks for you, Stalinberg.

 

[Billiejeens]

Will Cannon Even Rule On It?

This happened late Friday before the holiday weekend so I’m assuming many of you didn’t see it: In the Mar-a-Lago case, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to modify the terms of Donald Trump’s release, asking the court to prohibit him from further attacks on federal law enforcement.

The latest parry arises from Trump’s blatantly false and highly incendiary claims that President Biden effectively ordered Trump’s assassination by dispatching a FBI kill team to do the Mar-a-Lago search. It’s batshit crazy stuff, and Smith is asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon … sigh … to order a stop to it.

It’s not a gag order per se; it’s a modification of Trump’s terms of release, which keeps him out of jail pending trial. So it doesn’t have the same First Amendment issues that might accompany any order against a non-criminal defendant.

Yesterday, Trump filed a big, over-the-top response, asking for Smith’s motion to be stricken and any DOJ lawyers associated with its filing be sanctioned.

In a normal case, this would be set up a big showdown in front of Cannon – and either side might end up appealing her ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is of course not a normal case. Cannon’s M.O. so far has been simply not ruling on pending motions. Hard to have a showdown in front of the judge when the judge is a no show.
New Trouble Is Brewing In The Mar-a-Lago Case

Judge declines to bar Trump from making comments about law enforcement

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday refused a request by prosecutors to impose a gag order barring Donald Trump from making inflammatory comments about law enforcement, after Trump's campaign falsely claimed the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during its search of his Florida estate.
Special Counsel Jack Smith previously asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to modify the Republican presidential candidate's conditions of release, saying his "false and inflammatory" comments about the FBI could subject the bureau and trial witnesses to "threats, violence and harassment."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...ng-comments-about-law-enforcement-2024-05-28/

Smith should have asked the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon months ago. This, after her second, highly prejudicial ruling in Trump's favor was slapped down. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

You need mental help, so badly

 

[rampart]

Will Cannon Even Rule On It?

This happened late Friday before the holiday weekend so I’m assuming many of you didn’t see it: In the Mar-a-Lago case, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to modify the terms of Donald Trump’s release, asking the court to prohibit him from further attacks on federal law enforcement.

The latest parry arises from Trump’s blatantly false and highly incendiary claims that President Biden effectively ordered Trump’s assassination by dispatching a FBI kill team to do the Mar-a-Lago search. It’s batshit crazy stuff, and Smith is asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon … sigh … to order a stop to it.

It’s not a gag order per se; it’s a modification of Trump’s terms of release, which keeps him out of jail pending trial. So it doesn’t have the same First Amendment issues that might accompany any order against a non-criminal defendant.

Yesterday, Trump filed a big, over-the-top response, asking for Smith’s motion to be stricken and any DOJ lawyers associated with its filing be sanctioned.

In a normal case, this would be set up a big showdown in front of Cannon – and either side might end up appealing her ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is of course not a normal case. Cannon’s M.O. so far has been simply not ruling on pending motions. Hard to have a showdown in front of the judge when the judge is a no show.
New Trouble Is Brewing In The Mar-a-Lago Case

Judge declines to bar Trump from making comments about law enforcement

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday refused a request by prosecutors to impose a gag order barring Donald Trump from making inflammatory comments about law enforcement, after Trump's campaign falsely claimed the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during its search of his Florida estate.
Special Counsel Jack Smith previously asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to modify the Republican presidential candidate's conditions of release, saying his "false and inflammatory" comments about the FBI could subject the bureau and trial witnesses to "threats, violence and harassment."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...ng-comments-about-law-enforcement-2024-05-28/

Smith should have asked the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon months ago. This, after her second, highly prejudicial ruling in Trump's favor was slapped down. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

by finally ruling on something, smith now has something to appeal, to the 11th,

the widest and most dangerous release of classified information since benedict arnold and this guy will NEVER answer for it.

 

[WEATHER53]

Will Cannon Even Rule On It?

This happened late Friday before the holiday weekend so I’m assuming many of you didn’t see it: In the Mar-a-Lago case, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to modify the terms of Donald Trump’s release, asking the court to prohibit him from further attacks on federal law enforcement.

The latest parry arises from Trump’s blatantly false and highly incendiary claims that President Biden effectively ordered Trump’s assassination by dispatching a FBI kill team to do the Mar-a-Lago search. It’s batshit crazy stuff, and Smith is asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon … sigh … to order a stop to it.

It’s not a gag order per se; it’s a modification of Trump’s terms of release, which keeps him out of jail pending trial. So it doesn’t have the same First Amendment issues that might accompany any order against a non-criminal defendant.

Yesterday, Trump filed a big, over-the-top response, asking for Smith’s motion to be stricken and any DOJ lawyers associated with its filing be sanctioned.

In a normal case, this would be set up a big showdown in front of Cannon – and either side might end up appealing her ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is of course not a normal case. Cannon’s M.O. so far has been simply not ruling on pending motions. Hard to have a showdown in front of the judge when the judge is a no show.
New Trouble Is Brewing In The Mar-a-Lago Case

Judge declines to bar Trump from making comments about law enforcement

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday refused a request by prosecutors to impose a gag order barring Donald Trump from making inflammatory comments about law enforcement, after Trump's campaign falsely claimed the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during its search of his Florida estate.
Special Counsel Jack Smith previously asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to modify the Republican presidential candidate's conditions of release, saying his "false and inflammatory" comments about the FBI could subject the bureau and trial witnesses to "threats, violence and harassment."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...ng-comments-about-law-enforcement-2024-05-28/

Smith should have asked the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon months ago. This, after her second, highly prejudicial ruling in Trump's favor was slapped down. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

Biden can talk anywhere anytime to anybody. Hell he just visited a witness
Trumps utterances kick off a firestorm of push back from the truth and thus gag orders

 

[Billiejeens]

by finally ruling on something, smith now has something to appeal, to the 11th,

the widest and most dangerous release of classified information since benedict arnold and this guy will NEVER answer for it.

Because
It never actually happened

True story.

 

[scruffy]

. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

lmao!

Aw... tissue?

Hey - your game, your rules. You were warned.

Don't ever bitch at us about impropriety. You clowns are the kings of impropriety. The whole lot of you were raised by wolves.

 

[westwall]

by finally ruling on something, smith now has something to appeal, to the 11th,

the widest and most dangerous release of classified information since benedict arnold and this guy will NEVER answer for it.

Ummmm, that was YOUR hero, xiden. He's been stealing classified documents since he was a Senator.

Trump did nothing illegal.

But your little bitch, Smith, sure did.

 

[HikerGuy83]

She strikes again.....

But the OP then asks a question if she is even going to do anything.

A little heavy at the BBQ yesterday, sport.

 

[scruffy]

by finally ruling on something, smith now has something to appeal, to the 11th,

the widest and most dangerous release of classified information since benedict arnold and this guy will NEVER answer for it.

Hilarious.

You dumb fucktards haven't seen the documents.

You have no idea what's in them, or not in them.

No wonder you idiots are bleeding votes.

 

[rampart]

Hilarious.

You dumb fucktards haven't seen the documents.

You have no idea what's in them, or not in them.

No wonder you idiots are bleeding votes.

it does not matter what the information was.

 

[scruffy]

it does not matter what the information was.

Thanks for admitting you're a liar and a fool.

 

[rampart]

Thanks for admitting you're a liar and a fool.

i am neither. the information was marked "classified." if it were not valuable or important he would have left it alone.

if you think trump is responsible enough to even know this stuff YOU are the fool.

 

[scruffy]

i am neither. the information was marked "classified." if it were not valuable or important he would have left it alone.

if you think trump is responsible enough to even know this stuff YOU are the fool.

I don't care about vague generalities.

Donald Trump had the best numbers in 80 years.

He was the first president in EIGHTY YEARS who didn't start a foreign war.

You lefturds used to be about peace. What happened?

Now you're out there rioting and looting and generally making first class nuisances out of yourselves.

 

[westwall]

Hilarious.

You dumb fucktards haven't seen the documents.

You have no idea what's in them, or not in them.

No wonder you idiots are bleeding votes.

Actually, we DO know that the famous photograph that the fbi was all hot and bothered about, was fake. Yet another fraud perpetrated on the American public by that corrupt piece of shit, smith.

 

[Independent thinker]

Will Cannon Even Rule On It?

This happened late Friday before the holiday weekend so I’m assuming many of you didn’t see it: In the Mar-a-Lago case, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to modify the terms of Donald Trump’s release, asking the court to prohibit him from further attacks on federal law enforcement.

The latest parry arises from Trump’s blatantly false and highly incendiary claims that President Biden effectively ordered Trump’s assassination by dispatching a FBI kill team to do the Mar-a-Lago search. It’s batshit crazy stuff, and Smith is asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon … sigh … to order a stop to it.

It’s not a gag order per se; it’s a modification of Trump’s terms of release, which keeps him out of jail pending trial. So it doesn’t have the same First Amendment issues that might accompany any order against a non-criminal defendant.

Yesterday, Trump filed a big, over-the-top response, asking for Smith’s motion to be stricken and any DOJ lawyers associated with its filing be sanctioned.

In a normal case, this would be set up a big showdown in front of Cannon – and either side might end up appealing her ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is of course not a normal case. Cannon’s M.O. so far has been simply not ruling on pending motions. Hard to have a showdown in front of the judge when the judge is a no show.
New Trouble Is Brewing In The Mar-a-Lago Case

Judge declines to bar Trump from making comments about law enforcement

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday refused a request by prosecutors to impose a gag order barring Donald Trump from making inflammatory comments about law enforcement, after Trump's campaign falsely claimed the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during its search of his Florida estate.
Special Counsel Jack Smith previously asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to modify the Republican presidential candidate's conditions of release, saying his "false and inflammatory" comments about the FBI could subject the bureau and trial witnesses to "threats, violence and harassment."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...ng-comments-about-law-enforcement-2024-05-28/

Smith should have asked the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon months ago. This, after her second, highly prejudicial ruling in Trump's favor was slapped down. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

Glad Trump finally gets first amendment rights. Funny how the left don't mind putting law enforcement lives in danger through all of their policies, including letting BLM rioters riot.

 

[Billo_Really]

Will Cannon Even Rule On It?

This happened late Friday before the holiday weekend so I’m assuming many of you didn’t see it: In the Mar-a-Lago case, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to modify the terms of Donald Trump’s release, asking the court to prohibit him from further attacks on federal law enforcement.

The latest parry arises from Trump’s blatantly false and highly incendiary claims that President Biden effectively ordered Trump’s assassination by dispatching a FBI kill team to do the Mar-a-Lago search. It’s batshit crazy stuff, and Smith is asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon … sigh … to order a stop to it.

It’s not a gag order per se; it’s a modification of Trump’s terms of release, which keeps him out of jail pending trial. So it doesn’t have the same First Amendment issues that might accompany any order against a non-criminal defendant.

Yesterday, Trump filed a big, over-the-top response, asking for Smith’s motion to be stricken and any DOJ lawyers associated with its filing be sanctioned.

In a normal case, this would be set up a big showdown in front of Cannon – and either side might end up appealing her ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is of course not a normal case. Cannon’s M.O. so far has been simply not ruling on pending motions. Hard to have a showdown in front of the judge when the judge is a no show.
New Trouble Is Brewing In The Mar-a-Lago Case

Judge declines to bar Trump from making comments about law enforcement

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday refused a request by prosecutors to impose a gag order barring Donald Trump from making inflammatory comments about law enforcement, after Trump's campaign falsely claimed the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during its search of his Florida estate.
Special Counsel Jack Smith previously asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to modify the Republican presidential candidate's conditions of release, saying his "false and inflammatory" comments about the FBI could subject the bureau and trial witnesses to "threats, violence and harassment."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...ng-comments-about-law-enforcement-2024-05-28/

Smith should have asked the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon months ago. This, after her second, highly prejudicial ruling in Trump's favor was slapped down. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

God, I hate that woman!

 

[westwall]

God, I hate that woman!

Of course you do. She ain't a nazi, like you.

 

[Oddball]

Will Cannon Even Rule On It?

This happened late Friday before the holiday weekend so I’m assuming many of you didn’t see it: In the Mar-a-Lago case, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to modify the terms of Donald Trump’s release, asking the court to prohibit him from further attacks on federal law enforcement.

The latest parry arises from Trump’s blatantly false and highly incendiary claims that President Biden effectively ordered Trump’s assassination by dispatching a FBI kill team to do the Mar-a-Lago search. It’s batshit crazy stuff, and Smith is asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon … sigh … to order a stop to it.

It’s not a gag order per se; it’s a modification of Trump’s terms of release, which keeps him out of jail pending trial. So it doesn’t have the same First Amendment issues that might accompany any order against a non-criminal defendant.

Yesterday, Trump filed a big, over-the-top response, asking for Smith’s motion to be stricken and any DOJ lawyers associated with its filing be sanctioned.

In a normal case, this would be set up a big showdown in front of Cannon – and either side might end up appealing her ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is of course not a normal case. Cannon’s M.O. so far has been simply not ruling on pending motions. Hard to have a showdown in front of the judge when the judge is a no show.
New Trouble Is Brewing In The Mar-a-Lago Case

Judge declines to bar Trump from making comments about law enforcement

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday refused a request by prosecutors to impose a gag order barring Donald Trump from making inflammatory comments about law enforcement, after Trump's campaign falsely claimed the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during its search of his Florida estate.
Special Counsel Jack Smith previously asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to modify the Republican presidential candidate's conditions of release, saying his "false and inflammatory" comments about the FBI could subject the bureau and trial witnesses to "threats, violence and harassment."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...ng-comments-about-law-enforcement-2024-05-28/

Smith should have asked the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon months ago. This, after her second, highly prejudicial ruling in Trump's favor was slapped down. We are seeing what a rogue legal system hijacked by Trumpists looks like in real time.

 

[Oddball]

i am neither. the information was marked "classified." if it were not valuable or important he would have left it alone.

if you think trump is responsible enough to even know this stuff YOU are the fool.

It has been revealed that those photos were faked, rube.