Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chelsea Handler: ‘My armed guards don’t have semi-automatic weapons’
march 30 2018 While engaging in a debate over gun control on Twitter, Chelsea Handler made an astounding claim about her armed security detail:
@chelseahandler
My armed guards aren’t killing children and don’t have semi automatic weapons.
10:32 AM - Mar 28, 2018
Of course, it is not astounding that the former E! Channel, former Netflix and apparently future NBC talk show host has armed security guards who don’t kill children, but the notion that they don’t carry handguns that discharge spent cartridges and load a round of ammunition automatically on each trigger pull is dumbfounding and impossible to believe.
Actually, if ya think about it...
a revolver IS a semi-automatic weapon.
you shoot, the next bullet automatically rolls into place.
There isn't an armed bodyguard out there that uses a revolver anymoreActually, if ya think about it...
a revolver IS a semi-automatic weapon.
you shoot, the next bullet automatically rolls into place.
not paying attention...Actually, if ya think about it...
a revolver IS a semi-automatic weapon.
you shoot, the next bullet automatically rolls into place.
Hey einstein. Is the spent cartridge ejected? Does the revolver hold 18 rounds?. Can it be reloaded in two seconds.?
Actually, if ya think about it...
a revolver IS a semi-automatic weapon.
you shoot, the next bullet automatically rolls into place.
Actually, if ya think about it...
a revolver IS a semi-automatic weapon.
you shoot, the next bullet automatically rolls into place.
Her security uses muskets. Every Liberal knows that's the type of arms the 2nd Amendment is referring to.So she admits she has armed guards like all the rich do. As for her claim they don't have semi-automatic weapons, that is almost certainly a bald-faced lie on her part. Revolvers today are very rare among security professionals.
Chelsea Handler: ‘My armed guards don’t have semi-automatic weapons’
march 30 2018 While engaging in a debate over gun control on Twitter, Chelsea Handler made an astounding claim about her armed security detail:
@chelseahandler
My armed guards aren’t killing children and don’t have semi automatic weapons.
10:32 AM - Mar 28, 2018
Of course, it is not astounding that the former E! Channel, former Netflix and apparently future NBC talk show host has armed security guards who don’t kill children, but the notion that they don’t carry handguns that discharge spent cartridges and load a round of ammunition automatically on each trigger pull is dumbfounding and impossible to believe.
They are already permitted as necessary for their lawful purpose...300,000,000 of them.nothing wrong with such weaponry being permitted as necessary for their lawful purpose...
So she admits she has armed guards like all the rich do. As for her claim they don't have semi-automatic weapons, that is almost certainly a bald-faced lie on her part. Revolvers today are very rare among security professionals.
Chelsea Handler: ‘My armed guards don’t have semi-automatic weapons’
march 30 2018 While engaging in a debate over gun control on Twitter, Chelsea Handler made an astounding claim about her armed security detail:
@chelseahandler
My armed guards aren’t killing children and don’t have semi automatic weapons.
10:32 AM - Mar 28, 2018
Of course, it is not astounding that the former E! Channel, former Netflix and apparently future NBC talk show host has armed security guards who don’t kill children, but the notion that they don’t carry handguns that discharge spent cartridges and load a round of ammunition automatically on each trigger pull is dumbfounding and impossible to believe.
Most Left Wingers are not very informed or very bright.
armed guards have a lawful purpose for their weaponry.
they should be required to be appropriately trained and licensed for that lawful purpose.
citizens who wish to bear arms to defend themselves with deadly force by gun should be required to be trained and permitted for whichever weapon suits that lawful purpose. in any case, a weapon of rapid mass human slaughter is not necessary to defend your home or your family.
nothing wrong with such weaponry being permitted as necessary for their lawful purpose...
Tell that to the residents of Maryland.citizens who wish to bear arms to defend themselves with deadly force by gun should be required to be trained and permitted for whichever weapon suits that lawful purpose. in any case, a weapon of rapid mass human slaughter is not necessary to defend your home or your family.
nothing wrong with such weaponry being permitted as necessary for their lawful purpose...
Yeah especially when it is the elite that are the only people allowed to have them. Right? No need for the peasants and the serfs to be able to protect themselves....from the elite....right?
