Chesebro Pleads Guilty, Required to Testify in Future Cases

There are no Trumpers in this thread.
4i6Ckte.gif
 
Congrats to Fani Willis for accumulating overwhelming evidence of the RICO conspiracy. Those Repub nitwits in the GA legislature who passed a law allowing them to fire DA's they don't like must be really pissed now.
She downgraded them from felonies to misdemeanors is all that happened. notice she has not put a single person in jail.
 
Another sphincter pucker for P01135809...

Five years probation as well as a $5,000.00 fine, 100 hours community. And he must write a letter of apology. He must also continue to cooperate with prosecutors in other trials...



oh no. the cheese bro folded. a clear sign of all working according to trumps plan. he is a genius and will now get even moar votes.
 
Actually they are being convicted of misdemeanors and not felonies. And they do it understanding the system is corrupt today.
No, actually Conspiracy is a felony. Cheseboro admits being in a felonious conspiracy, as charged with the others, that are still scheduled to go to trial. Only now, going to trial, with one of them admitting to the felony conspiracy, promising to testify (without 5th amendment protection on self incrimination) and providing documents and evidence. This was a key guy. Team trump is f#cked.
 
Last edited:
The Lies Unsocial posts are going to be awesome.
I imagine there is a bevy of lawyers standing in a circle around Trump telling him to keep his big mouth shut, his tiny fingers off the keyboard, and his inflamed nose away from the crushed Adderall, for once in his idiot life.
 
Actually they are being convicted of misdemeanors and not felonies. And they do it understanding the system is corrupt today.

because they plea bargained & got them reduced - which can ALWAYS be revoked as well. it's called a proffer.

proffer​

Primary tabs​

A proffer is a mechanism to offer or present evidence at trial for immediate acceptance or rejection. In State v. Boyd, 25 P.3d 985, the court held that “proffer is a mechanism by which a party may create an appellate record of what the evidence would have shown.” Similarly, in People v. Weinke, 50 N.E.3d 688, it was held that “a proffer is used to convince a trial court to admit evidence, and must apprise the trial court what the offered evidence is or what the expected testimony will be, by whom it will be presented and its purpose.”
proffer

in the kraken's case - not only does the DA have her as a first person witness testimony; but she has promsed under oath that she has documents that will show donny et al are criminals.
 
because they plea bargained & got them reduced - which can ALWAYS be revoked as well. it's called a proffer.

proffer​

Primary tabs​

A proffer is a mechanism to offer or present evidence at trial for immediate acceptance or rejection. In State v. Boyd, 25 P.3d 985, the court held that “proffer is a mechanism by which a party may create an appellate record of what the evidence would have shown.” Similarly, in People v. Weinke, 50 N.E.3d 688, it was held that “a proffer is used to convince a trial court to admit evidence, and must apprise the trial court what the offered evidence is or what the expected testimony will be, by whom it will be presented and its purpose.”
proffer

in the kraken's case - not only does the DA have her as a first person witness testimony; but she has promsed under oath that she has documents that will show donny et al are criminals.
Hell man, keep hoping she will testify against Trump. Trump committed no crimes as you already know.
And trust me, the documents of this were created by Democrats and not Sydney. She has nothing more to fear. Trump never will be convicted.
 
I imagine there is a bevy of lawyers standing in a circle around Trump telling him to keep his big mouth shut, his tiny fingers off the keyboard, and his inflamed nose away from the crushed Adderall, for once in his idiot life.
Georgia has a shitty prosecutor. You Democrats are pleased with probation?
 

Forum List

Back
Top