Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

[Toddsterpatriot]

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

did you miss the fact that the unemployment rate is lower, not higher; as is required by your right wing fallacy?

Did you also miss the fact that those areas have a very high cost of living and a lot of wealthy people living there? You know, the people you love to hate, but in this case make higher wages possible?

Try doubling the MW in many areas of the country and you'd see a wasteland.

lol any place where they can't pay a lousy $17 an hour is already a wasteland that doesn't have much an economy to begin with.

Exactly!

Screw all the losers who make less.
They don't deserve any jobs at all...……..moron.

 

[Picaro]

The Chick Fila franchise a mile from my house is packed all the time, morning, noon, afternoon, and evenings. It has three four times the traffic any of the other franchises around them have. So much for 'not buying a Chick Fila franchise'.

 

[Picaro]

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

did you miss the fact that the unemployment rate is lower, not higher; as is required by your right wing fallacy?

Did you also miss the fact that those areas have a very high cost of living and a lot of wealthy people living there? You know, the people you love to hate, but in this case make higher wages possible?

Try doubling the MW in many areas of the country and you'd see a wasteland.

lol any place where they can't pay a lousy $17 an hour is already a wasteland that doesn't have much an economy to begin with.

Exactly!

Screw all the losers who make less.
They don't deserve any jobs at all...……..moron.

Another Hero of the Corporate Ass Kissers who makes $12 an hour and needs to feel 'Special' in the comfort of fast food workers making $7.25 an hour. Your 401K is going to be worth many millions, though, right? lol sure it is.

 

[OnePercenter]

The vast majority of conservatives on his board are against the working class making a livable wage.

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Workers are laid off for two reasons:

1) The employer is an idiot.

2) Investors want unrealistic returns.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

did you miss the fact that the unemployment rate is lower, not higher; as is required by your right wing fallacy?

Did you also miss the fact that those areas have a very high cost of living and a lot of wealthy people living there? You know, the people you love to hate, but in this case make higher wages possible?

Try doubling the MW in many areas of the country and you'd see a wasteland.

lol any place where they can't pay a lousy $17 an hour is already a wasteland that doesn't have much an economy to begin with.

Exactly!

Screw all the losers who make less.
They don't deserve any jobs at all...……..moron.

Another Hero of the Corporate Ass Kissers who makes $12 an hour and needs to feel 'Special' in the comfort of fast food workers making $7.25 an hour. Your 401K is going to be worth many millions, though, right? lol sure it is.

Another Hero of the Corporate Ass Kissers

Right, understanding economics means I'm an ass kisser. DERP!!

in the comfort of fast food workers making $7.25 an hour.

$0 is so much better than $7.25.

 

[OnePercenter]

The Chick Fila franchise a mile from my house is packed all the time, morning, noon, afternoon, and evenings. It has three four times the traffic any of the other franchises around them have. So much for 'not buying a Chick Fila franchise'.

You can't buy a Chick franchise, you buy a job, a job that requires you to work 60-70 hours per week, and church on Sunday. You NEVER get a day off.

 

[Picaro]

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Workers are laid off for two reasons:

1) The employer is an idiot.

2) Investors want unrealistic returns.

Execs deserve billions in bonuses and massive pay incentives for driving their companies bankrupt, just as Romney and all the other 'Private Equity' companies specialize in , that make billions bankrupting sound companies.

 

[Picaro]

Another Hero of the Corporate Ass Kissers

Right, understanding economics means I'm an ass kisser. DERP!!

lol you don't know jack shit; you're just another parrot.

in the comfort of fast food workers making $7.25 an hour.

$0 is so much better than $7.25.

No, $17 an hour is, dumbass. See, you're too stupid to get by without somebody holding your hand.

 

[JoeMoma]

A Chick-fil-A owner in Sacramento, CA, said he’ll up the ante for any of his employees hired as “hospitality professionals.” They currently make $12.50 to $13 an hour.

What percentage of the employees are hired as "hospitality professionals"? Seems to me that there is a loophole to pay many employees less than $17/hour. Not that there is anything wrong with paying a minimum of $17/hour if the management so chooses.

ALL employees of Chick are called "Hospitality Professionals."

If by management you mean the operators, they don't pay them, Chick does.

link?

For a third time:

Fail!
Chick-fil-A Team Member - Job Description & Salary

job-applications.com is NOT Chick-fil-A. Try again.

The video you linked also isn't Chick-Fil-A. If you can find a direct Chick-Fil-A link that says all their employees are routinely called "Hospitality Professionals", then lets have it.

 

[JoeMoma]

The Chick Fila franchise a mile from my house is packed all the time, morning, noon, afternoon, and evenings. It has three four times the traffic any of the other franchises around them have. So much for 'not buying a Chick Fila franchise'.

You can't buy a Chick franchise, you buy a job, a job that requires you to work 60-70 hours per week, and church on Sunday. You NEVER get a day off.

^^^^President of the Liars Club^^^^^

 

[Picaro]

Dozens of franchises closed around here over the decades. how is that possible when minimum wage stayed toe same for so many years, at far less than the inflation rate???

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Another Hero of the Corporate Ass Kissers

Right, understanding economics means I'm an ass kisser. DERP!!

lol you don't know jack shit; you're just another parrot.

in the comfort of fast food workers making $7.25 an hour.

$0 is so much better than $7.25.

No, $17 an hour is, dumbass. See, you're too stupid to get by without somebody holding your hand.

lol you don't know jack shit

I know more than you......low bar, admittedly.


No, $17 an hour is, dumbass

Hey, fucktard, it you only add $10 an hour in value, you won't get hired at $17 an hour, you'll be unemployed

at $0 an hour.

 

[danielpalos]

That isn't the case in Seattle or San Francisco. Both have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

 

[hadit]

You know no such thing.

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

Your argument is totally fallacious. The fact that you cannot even see any other possibility reveals your intransigence.

you have no economic argument. only socialism on a national basis.

You're failing (again) to address the glaring weaknesses in your failed arguments.

like what?

I already pointed some out. Deal with them first.

 

[hadit]

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

Why are you tRump/Putin commies against that?

Because they see it as lowering their own imaginary status re the 'food chain'; many skilled idiots are working for around that wage now, and they need fast food workers to look down on and sneer at, which they can't do if minimum wage actually rises to match inflation; on the low end of estimates, that would be around $17.65 an hour; by the gold standard so many right wingers adore and, it would be more like $27 an hour. Now they're all butthurt because they don't have any balls and won't ask for raises for themselves; they want fast food workers to make half of what they make so then they can feel all superior n stuff. That's because they're stupid and think ass kissing works. Now they pray to their 401K's, like lemmings.

That kind of bitterness will destroy you.

You're just projecting, and of course you know my number are right on, slightly dated in fact and should be higher, actually.

Just bought a burger and fries at a diner yesterday, in fact, with onion rings and iced tea. $13.15, plus left a cash tip of $3. They ain't paying the help anywhere near $17 an hour, so you weirdos should just grow up and quit trying to sell your BS re minimum wages and their effects on prices; too many people know better. Try a different gimmick.

Seriously, you're going to be miserable and complain a lot when you really don't have to. Why can't you just be happy and let other people be happy as well?

Yew, we already know you have no business argument that can refute the facts. Your misery over workers making more money than a Red Chinese coolie is probably going to give you right wing sociopaths cancer. and early heart attacks.

Sigh. You try to help people give up hatred and bitterness so they'll be happier, but they just prefer being miserable. Oh, well.

 

[hadit]

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Workers are laid off for two reasons:

1) The employer is an idiot.

2) Investors want unrealistic returns.

You're displaying an astonishing lack of knowledge regarding business.

 

[hadit]

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Workers are laid off for two reasons:

1) The employer is an idiot.

2) Investors want unrealistic returns.

Execs deserve billions in bonuses and massive pay incentives for driving their companies bankrupt, just as Romney and all the other 'Private Equity' companies specialize in , that make billions bankrupting sound companies.

More astonishing lack of business knowledge. Also envy and bitterness.

 

[Picaro]

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

Your argument is totally fallacious. The fact that you cannot even see any other possibility reveals your intransigence.

you have no economic argument. only socialism on a national basis.

You're failing (again) to address the glaring weaknesses in your failed arguments.

like what?

I already pointed some out. Deal with them first.

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Workers are laid off for two reasons:

1) The employer is an idiot.

2) Investors want unrealistic returns.

Execs deserve billions in bonuses and massive pay incentives for driving their companies bankrupt, just as Romney and all the other 'Private Equity' companies specialize in , that make billions bankrupting sound companies.

More astonishing lack of business knowledge. Also envy and bitterness.

You have always been a huge fan of class warfare. No different here. You just like screwing over working people, period; it has nothing to do with business, it's just you and your snotbbery.

 

[Picaro]

Because they see it as lowering their own imaginary status re the 'food chain'; many skilled idiots are working for around that wage now, and they need fast food workers to look down on and sneer at, which they can't do if minimum wage actually rises to match inflation; on the low end of estimates, that would be around $17.65 an hour; by the gold standard so many right wingers adore and, it would be more like $27 an hour. Now they're all butthurt because they don't have any balls and won't ask for raises for themselves; they want fast food workers to make half of what they make so then they can feel all superior n stuff. That's because they're stupid and think ass kissing works. Now they pray to their 401K's, like lemmings.

That kind of bitterness will destroy you.

You're just projecting, and of course you know my number are right on, slightly dated in fact and should be higher, actually.

Just bought a burger and fries at a diner yesterday, in fact, with onion rings and iced tea. $13.15, plus left a cash tip of $3. They ain't paying the help anywhere near $17 an hour, so you weirdos should just grow up and quit trying to sell your BS re minimum wages and their effects on prices; too many people know better. Try a different gimmick.

Seriously, you're going to be miserable and complain a lot when you really don't have to. Why can't you just be happy and let other people be happy as well?

Yew, we already know you have no business argument that can refute the facts. Your misery over workers making more money than a Red Chinese coolie is probably going to give you right wing sociopaths cancer. and early heart attacks.

Sigh. You try to help people give up hatred and bitterness so they'll be happier, but they just prefer being miserable. Oh, well.

Yeah, you sound like you're real happy, the life of the party and all that .... lol

 

[Picaro]

Another Hero of the Corporate Ass Kissers

Right, understanding economics means I'm an ass kisser. DERP!!

lol you don't know jack shit; you're just another parrot.

in the comfort of fast food workers making $7.25 an hour.

$0 is so much better than $7.25.

No, $17 an hour is, dumbass. See, you're too stupid to get by without somebody holding your hand.

lol you don't know jack shit

I know more than you......low bar, admittedly.


No, $17 an hour is, dumbass

Hey, fucktard, it you only add $10 an hour in value, you won't get hired at $17 an hour, you'll be unemployed

at $0 an hour.

Oh pipe down, troll; you're just another spammer with an agenda, and an especially dumb one at that. You know nothing about business or labor costs, period, and you know squat about 'adding value' to anything. You don't even know how to fill out those 1040 EZ's you have HR Block do for you every year. You just take their word for it what you owe.

Anybody who can't pay $17 an hour isn't doing enough business to hire anybody in the first place. IT's either a glutted market, or one of no real value to anybody. That's all there is to it.