Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

[Picaro]

I told you that fast food makes big profit!

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

You go guys! Keep the Golden State, golden!

Everything good for workers and consumers comes from California.

I think we broke him.

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

Why are you tRump/Putin commies against that?

Because they see it as lowering their own imaginary status re the 'food chain'; many skilled idiots are working for around that wage now, and they need fast food workers to look down on and sneer at, which they can't do if minimum wage actually rises to match inflation; on the low end of estimates, that would be around $17.65 an hour; by the gold standard so many right wingers adore and, it would be more like $27 an hour. Now they're all butthurt because they don't have any balls and won't ask for raises for themselves; they want fast food workers to make half of what they make so then they can feel all superior n stuff. That's because they're stupid and think ass kissing works. Now they pray to their 401K's, like lemmings.

 

[hadit]

I don't think anyone in this thread has been against Chick-fil-A or any other restaurant that so chooses paying their employees $17/hour.

The vast majority of conservatives on his board are against the working class making a livable wage.

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

 

[hadit]

The vast majority of conservatives on his board are against the working class making a livable wage.

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

Now we know why the right wing, doesn't like it.

You know no such thing.

 

[hadit]

I told you that fast food makes big profit!

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

You go guys! Keep the Golden State, golden!

Everything good for workers and consumers comes from California.

I think we broke him.

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

Why are you tRump/Putin commies against that?

Because they see it as lowering their own imaginary status re the 'food chain'; many skilled idiots are working for around that wage now, and they need fast food workers to look down on and sneer at, which they can't do if minimum wage actually rises to match inflation; on the low end of estimates, that would be around $17.65 an hour; by the gold standard so many right wingers adore and, it would be more like $27 an hour. Now they're all butthurt because they don't have any balls and won't ask for raises for themselves; they want fast food workers to make half of what they make so then they can feel all superior n stuff. That's because they're stupid and think ass kissing works. Now they pray to their 401K's, like lemmings.

That kind of bitterness will destroy you.

 

[danielpalos]

The vast majority of conservatives on his board are against the working class making a livable wage.

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

 

[danielpalos]

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

Now we know why the right wing, doesn't like it.

You know no such thing.

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

 

[hadit]

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

Now we know why the right wing, doesn't like it.

You know no such thing.

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

Your argument is totally fallacious. The fact that you cannot even see any other possibility reveals your intransigence.

 

[hadit]

You lie.

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

 

[Picaro]

You go guys! Keep the Golden State, golden!

Everything good for workers and consumers comes from California.

I think we broke him.

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

Why are you tRump/Putin commies against that?

Because they see it as lowering their own imaginary status re the 'food chain'; many skilled idiots are working for around that wage now, and they need fast food workers to look down on and sneer at, which they can't do if minimum wage actually rises to match inflation; on the low end of estimates, that would be around $17.65 an hour; by the gold standard so many right wingers adore and, it would be more like $27 an hour. Now they're all butthurt because they don't have any balls and won't ask for raises for themselves; they want fast food workers to make half of what they make so then they can feel all superior n stuff. That's because they're stupid and think ass kissing works. Now they pray to their 401K's, like lemmings.

That kind of bitterness will destroy you.

You're just projecting, and of course you know my number are right on, slightly dated in fact and should be higher, actually.

Just bought a burger and fries at a diner yesterday, in fact, with onion rings and iced tea. $13.15, plus left a cash tip of $3. They ain't paying the help anywhere near $17 an hour, so you weirdos should just grow up and quit trying to sell your BS re minimum wages and their effects on prices; too many people know better. Try a different gimmick.

 

[Picaro]

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

Now we know why the right wing, doesn't like it.

You know no such thing.

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

Well, it certainly appears that many of them have never filled out a tax return, or have the first clue about labor costs in many business. It has to be either ignorance or blatant lying. Some probably are professional liars working at at some 'business press' tabloid or other. The left wing aren't the only ones spamming the netz and making good use of Gramsci's methods.

 

[danielpalos]

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

Now we know why the right wing, doesn't like it.

You know no such thing.

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

Your argument is totally fallacious. The fact that you cannot even see any other possibility reveals your intransigence.

you have no economic argument. only socialism on a national basis.

 

[danielpalos]

Then why aren't any conservatives happy about:

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

did you miss the fact that the unemployment rate is lower, not higher; as is required by your right wing fallacy?

 

[hadit]

Everything good for workers and consumers comes from California.

I think we broke him.

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

Why are you tRump/Putin commies against that?

Because they see it as lowering their own imaginary status re the 'food chain'; many skilled idiots are working for around that wage now, and they need fast food workers to look down on and sneer at, which they can't do if minimum wage actually rises to match inflation; on the low end of estimates, that would be around $17.65 an hour; by the gold standard so many right wingers adore and, it would be more like $27 an hour. Now they're all butthurt because they don't have any balls and won't ask for raises for themselves; they want fast food workers to make half of what they make so then they can feel all superior n stuff. That's because they're stupid and think ass kissing works. Now they pray to their 401K's, like lemmings.

That kind of bitterness will destroy you.

You're just projecting, and of course you know my number are right on, slightly dated in fact and should be higher, actually.

Just bought a burger and fries at a diner yesterday, in fact, with onion rings and iced tea. $13.15, plus left a cash tip of $3. They ain't paying the help anywhere near $17 an hour, so you weirdos should just grow up and quit trying to sell your BS re minimum wages and their effects on prices; too many people know better. Try a different gimmick.

Seriously, you're going to be miserable and complain a lot when you really don't have to. Why can't you just be happy and let other people be happy as well?

 

[hadit]

The Working Poor will.

Now we know why the right wing, doesn't like it.

You know no such thing.

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

Your argument is totally fallacious. The fact that you cannot even see any other possibility reveals your intransigence.

you have no economic argument. only socialism on a national basis.

You're failing (again) to address the glaring weaknesses in your failed arguments.

 

[hadit]

The poor may benefit.

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

did you miss the fact that the unemployment rate is lower, not higher; as is required by your right wing fallacy?

Did you also miss the fact that those areas have a very high cost of living and a lot of wealthy people living there? You know, the people you love to hate, but in this case make higher wages possible?

Try doubling the MW in many areas of the country and you'd see a wasteland.

 

[danielpalos]

Now we know why the right wing, doesn't like it.

You know no such thing.

it must the Only reason; the right wing has nothing but fallacy, when it is about economics.

Your argument is totally fallacious. The fact that you cannot even see any other possibility reveals your intransigence.

you have no economic argument. only socialism on a national basis.

You're failing (again) to address the glaring weaknesses in your failed arguments.

like what?

 

[danielpalos]

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

did you miss the fact that the unemployment rate is lower, not higher; as is required by your right wing fallacy?

Did you also miss the fact that those areas have a very high cost of living and a lot of wealthy people living there? You know, the people you love to hate, but in this case make higher wages possible?

Try doubling the MW in many areas of the country and you'd see a wasteland.

no. i only noticed that they have a higher minimum wage and a lower unemployment rate.

right wing propaganda, must be wrong.

 

[OnePercenter]

A Chick-fil-A owner in Sacramento, CA, said he’ll up the ante for any of his employees hired as “hospitality professionals.” They currently make $12.50 to $13 an hour.

What percentage of the employees are hired as "hospitality professionals"? Seems to me that there is a loophole to pay many employees less than $17/hour. Not that there is anything wrong with paying a minimum of $17/hour if the management so chooses.

ALL employees of Chick are called "Hospitality Professionals."

If by management you mean the operators, they don't pay them, Chick does.

link?

For a third time:

Fail!
Chick-fil-A Team Member - Job Description & Salary

job-applications.com is NOT Chick-fil-A. Try again.

 

[Picaro]

I think we broke him.

Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

Why are you tRump/Putin commies against that?

Because they see it as lowering their own imaginary status re the 'food chain'; many skilled idiots are working for around that wage now, and they need fast food workers to look down on and sneer at, which they can't do if minimum wage actually rises to match inflation; on the low end of estimates, that would be around $17.65 an hour; by the gold standard so many right wingers adore and, it would be more like $27 an hour. Now they're all butthurt because they don't have any balls and won't ask for raises for themselves; they want fast food workers to make half of what they make so then they can feel all superior n stuff. That's because they're stupid and think ass kissing works. Now they pray to their 401K's, like lemmings.

That kind of bitterness will destroy you.

You're just projecting, and of course you know my number are right on, slightly dated in fact and should be higher, actually.

Just bought a burger and fries at a diner yesterday, in fact, with onion rings and iced tea. $13.15, plus left a cash tip of $3. They ain't paying the help anywhere near $17 an hour, so you weirdos should just grow up and quit trying to sell your BS re minimum wages and their effects on prices; too many people know better. Try a different gimmick.

Seriously, you're going to be miserable and complain a lot when you really don't have to. Why can't you just be happy and let other people be happy as well?

Yew, we already know you have no business argument that can refute the facts. Your misery over workers making more money than a Red Chinese coolie is probably going to give you right wing sociopaths cancer. and early heart attacks.

 

[Picaro]

The Working Poor will.

The ones laid off because their employer is forced to pay more than their labor is worth will not.

Just get a second part time job at fifteen an hour, if you need the money.

Seattle and San Francisco have lower unemployment rates than the national average.

Let's see if we get this straight. You want to make it harder for an unskilled worker or teenager to get a job in the first place, and your prescription is for them to get a second job? You do realize, don't you, the glaring problems in that?

The person was laid off because his labor isn't worth $15/hr. THAT MEANS HE DOESN'T HAVE A JOB. Now you want him to get a second job when he doesn't have a first one, and you've made it harder for him to get even one, much less two. If you left the MW alone, or raised it just enough that it really didn't matter, he could keep the first job and maybe get a second one.

did you miss the fact that the unemployment rate is lower, not higher; as is required by your right wing fallacy?

Did you also miss the fact that those areas have a very high cost of living and a lot of wealthy people living there? You know, the people you love to hate, but in this case make higher wages possible?

Try doubling the MW in many areas of the country and you'd see a wasteland.

lol any place where they can't pay a lousy $17 an hour is already a wasteland that doesn't have much an economy to begin with, just a lot more people who need food stamps to survive working a ' new economy job' and will probably vote Democrat, thus helping you tards cut your own throats.