China for first time backs UN resolution in which "russia" is called aggressor

[Kruska]

And yet they had no control over it. That’s like saying Mongolia was part of China in the 1930s.

Is this about factual control? - No, it's about territories belonging to China - such as Taiwan.

The Taiwanese sure don’t see it as China’s territory, and Beijing has no ability to force them to obey.

Wrong, Taipei beholds the same reverse claim onto mainland China - expressively upheld by the KMT. - (also claims towards the South-China-Sea upheld by Taipei are the same as those upheld by the PRC). See Taipei disputes with Vietnam, Philippines and e.g. Japan.

Unlike the ROC (which claimed Mongolia as an autonomous region) the PRC has never claimed Mongolia to belong to China. - therefore Mongolia is a UN acknowledged sovereign state. The Island of Taiwan is NOT, and is officially represented in the UN by the PRC.

Beijing has never forced Taipei to obey them - they are free to do whatever they want - within the status one country two systems. Where do you get all your errant info from?
The only stance between Beijing and Taipei is, that Beijing will not tolerate an independent Taiwan. And every single Taiwanese and Mainland Chinese knows that.

 

[Tiburon]

Is this about factual control? - No, it's about territories belonging to China - such as Taiwan.

Wrong, Taipei beholds the same reverse claim onto mainland China - expressively upheld by the KMT. - (also claims towards the South-China-Sea upheld by Taipei are the same as those upheld by the PRC). See Taipei disputes with Vietnam, Philippines and e.g. Japan.

Unlike the ROC (which claimed Mongolia as an autonomous region) the PRC has never claimed Mongolia to belong to China. - therefore Mongolia is a UN acknowledged sovereign state. The Island of Taiwan is NOT, and is officially represented in the UN by the PRC.

Beijing has never forced Taipei to obey them - they are free to do whatever they want - within the status one country two systems. Where do you get all your errant info from?
The only stance between Beijing and Taipei is, that Beijing will not tolerate an independent Taiwan. And every single Taiwanese and Mainland Chinese knows that.

If China can‘t exercise any actual control over Taiwan, saying Taiwan belongs to China simply isn’t born out by the facts on the ground.

The multiple Taiwan Straights Crises strongly demonstrate otherwise.

 

[Kruska]

If China can‘t exercise any actual control over Taiwan, saying Taiwan belongs to China simply isn’t born out by the facts on the ground.

Time for you to acquire some factual knowledge - and not continuously displaying your errant opinions based on MSM or your personal faulty opinion.
The PRC entirely controls Taiwan's economy and therefore also any future development -or in other words- the livelihood of the Taiwanese population.

The present Taipei governments policy to diversify Taiwanese investments are a futile attempt - that are not able to compensate the thus already arising economic losses.
So far the PRC has never made any serious attempt to "hinder" Taiwanese businesses, or to reduce the benefits given towards Taiwanese investors - aside from some pineapple issue.

The multiple Taiwan Straights Crises strongly demonstrate otherwise.

It simply demonstrates, that the PRC/PLA, PLAF and PLAN already has the capability to isolate Taiwan.

It also shows that if Taipei would actually invest into their military - so as to pose a serious challenge - Taipei would face economic ruin. After an increase of almost 14% last year, Taipei has an annual defense budget of around US$ 4 billion/year. Which contributes only to a deep sadness and disappointment amongst the US industrial military complex.

Israel with a third of Taiwan's population and also mirrored in a GDP comparison, spends around US$20 billion/year. Do the math yourself.

And aside from all this, you still keep ignoring Oct. 25, 1971

 

[Tiburon]

Time for you to acquire some factual knowledge - and not continuously displaying your errant opinions based on MSM or your personal faulty opinion.
The PRC entirely controls Taiwan's economy and therefore also any future development -or in other words- the livelihood of the Taiwanese population.

The present Taipei governments policy to diversify Taiwanese investments are a futile attempt - that are not able to compensate the thus already arising economic losses.
So far the PRC has never made any serious attempt to "hinder" Taiwanese businesses, or to reduce the benefits given towards Taiwanese investors - aside from some pineapple issue.

It simply demonstrates, that the PRC/PLA, PLAF and PLAN already has the capability to isolate Taiwan.

It also shows that if Taipei would actually invest into their military - so as to pose a serious challenge - Taipei would face economic ruin. After an increase of almost 14% last year, Taipei has an annual defense budget of around US$ 4 billion/year. Which contributes only to a deep sadness and disappointment amongst the US industrial military complex.

Israel with a third of Taiwan's population and also mirrored in a GDP comparison, spends around US$20 billion/year. Do the math yourself.

And aside from all this, you still keep ignoring Oct. 25, 1971

Taiwan already poses a serious military threat to the PLA attempting to occupy it. China has never attempted anything remotely close to the sort of massive amphibious assault an attack on Taiwan would entail, and China‘s last war— against Vietnam— went poorly for Beijing.

Furthermore, the crackdown in Hong Kong has shown Beijing‘s promises to be hollow. The odds of Taiwan submitting have resulting dropped drastically.

Furthemore, all of that is assuming the US doesn’t enter the conflict to support Taiwan. If it does, China‘s window to establish a successful beachhead and secure enough of the island shrinks quickly.

 

[Kruska]

Taiwan already poses a serious military threat to the PLA attempting to occupy it. China has never attempted anything remotely close to the sort of massive amphibious assault an attack on Taiwan would entail, and China‘s last war— against Vietnam— went poorly for Beijing.

Furthermore, the crackdown in Hong Kong has shown Beijing‘s promises to be hollow. The odds of Taiwan submitting have resulting dropped drastically.

Furthemore, all of that is assuming the US doesn’t enter the conflict to support Taiwan. If it does, China‘s window to establish a successful beachhead and secure enough of the island shrinks quickly.

Keep dreaming and living in the past, and don't forget Oct. 25, 1971

 

[Tiburon]

Keep dreaming and living in the past, and don't forget Oct. 25, 1971

Nobody’s forgotten that China is impotent to get Taiwan to obey its’ demands, and therefore the idea of Chinese ownership of the island is comical

 

[Kruska]

Nobody’s forgotten that China is impotent to get Taiwan to obey its’ demands, and therefore the idea of Chinese ownership of the island is comical

The only comical issues, are those statements you forward to support your errant personal opinions - and don't forget Oct. 25, 1971

 

[Litwin]

Aside from your lame attempts to attack me, here's an article:

Notorious Russian nationalist Igor Mangushev shot dead in Ukraine

Igor Mangushev was shot in the head and his killing sparks speculation about who was to blame.

www.bbc.com

"Notorious Russian nationalist Igor Mangushev shot dead in Ukraine"

"Mangushev emerged from a neo-Nazi movement to co-found private mercenary group Yenot (raccoon)."

You never heard, which means after your "extensive research" of doing NOTHING, you haven't heard, so you just assume..... typical.

related :

Moscow questions to ordinary people, Why is every country against us?

Moscow empire is coming to the end !

www.usmessageboard.com