JoeB131
Diamond Member
Why is it that people like you never see another point of view as legitimate?
Why is it that climate change - in your view - is a "settled science fact" but you doubt that science you put so much faith in can not come up with a way to burn coal clean?
With the opinions you express here it is a safe bet that you would have been part of the "scientific" crowd that wanted to burn Galileo on the stake because he challenged the "settled science" that the Earth is the center of the universe.
If you and Al Gore lived then you and Al Gore would have been the loudest promoter of flat Earth.
HOnestly, are you trying to challenge Dogstyle and Rotgut for the stupidest statement on the thread?
Galileo got in trouble because he disproved the bible.
AGW is based on massive collections of scientific data over a 50 year period for those too dumb to realize that yeah, it really is a lot warmer than it was when I was growing up.
If you and your ilk were not so obtuse you would realize that carbon dioxide is happily gobbled up by plants, the more the better. If anything contributes to warming as you and your ilk claims carbon dioxide does, it is water vapor. Of course you and your ilk has not dared to demonize water - YET.
Plain to see that you and your ilk just wants to see decent hard working coal miners be welfare recipients, out of a job, relying on government largesse and voting Democrat.
The problem with this 'Well, Carbon dioxide is natural" don't get that out atmosphere is primed to only have a certain percentage of it. Otherwise,we get a runaway greenhouse effect like Venus has.
Coal is a dirty, filthy technology we should be looking to move beyond, and no, there is no "clean coal" technology.