Christian churches ‘must be made’ to affirm homosexuality

[Uncensored2008]

We're talking about public accomodation laws.

(Some of) Those say you can't discriminate based on faith or sexual orientation.

Can you give an example of a patron discriminated against for their faith?

We're talking about equal protection under the law. When the same law is applied differently based on the favorability of the group identification of those involved, as is evident here, then the equal protection clause is clearly violated.

you're right. now can you give us an example of that happening?

That's why I did.

 

[ogibillm]

We're talking about public accomodation laws.

(Some of) Those say you can't discriminate based on faith or sexual orientation.

Can you give an example of a patron discriminated against for their faith?

We're talking about equal protection under the law. When the same law is applied differently based on the favorability of the group identification of those involved, as is evident here, then the equal protection clause is clearly violated.

you're right. now can you give us an example of that happening?

That's why I did.

you haven't given any such example yet. Care to try again?

 

[Syriusly]

We're talking about public accomodation laws.

(Some of) Those say you can't discriminate based on faith or sexual orientation.

Can you give an example of a patron discriminated against for their faith?

We're talking about equal protection under the law. When the same law is applied differently based on the favorability of the group identification of those involved, as is evident here, then the equal protection clause is clearly violated.

Two people are stopped for speeding and given tickets. Both goes to court and one successfully convinces the judge that she was not speeding. The other does not successfully convince the judge that she was not speeding.

Is that not equal protection of the law.

But of course you say it is because of who 'was discriminated against'- but once again- someone- a judge or a jury- decides each case individually. There is no evidence that the judge was biased in either case.

You just want to play victim because you are unwilling to accept that the outcomes can be different.

 

[Syriusly]

We're talking about public accomodation laws.

(Some of) Those say you can't discriminate based on faith or sexual orientation.

Can you give an example of a patron discriminated against for their faith?

We're talking about equal protection under the law. When the same law is applied differently based on the favorability of the group identification of those involved, .

So you agree that marriages which are intended to prevent same gender couples from marrying are unconstitutional based upon equal protection under the law?