Christians carrying the Rainbow Flag, have you considered this?

[BULLDOG]

I just found out that 1 MILLION FACEBOOK USERS HAVE SWITCHED TO RAINBOW FILTER IN SUPPORT OF DEGENERACY

Congratulations on a million new followers!

Oh... So in an attempt to injure me, the Prog feels that one sure way to do so is to project shameful behavior upon me?

And what shameful behavior is it projecting? Why Homosexuality of course... because, the level of shame from sexual deviancy is equal to the level of deviancy and there is NO SEXUAL DEVIANCY THAT DEVIATES FARTHER FROM THE HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL STANDARD... THAT HOMOSEXUALITY.

LOL!

You can NOT make this crap up! They're HELPLESS!

You're the only one who thinks it's shameful.....well, you and Ted Haggard.

Well... to be fair... me and 1.49 Billion Facebook users.

Not that many people in the country dumbass. Are you smoking crack?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I just found out that 1 MILLION FACEBOOK USERS HAVE SWITCHED TO RAINBOW FILTER IN SUPPORT OF DEGENERACY

Congratulations on a million new followers!

Oh... So in an attempt to injure me, the Prog feels that one sure way to do so is to project shameful behavior upon me?

And what shameful behavior is it projecting? Why Homosexuality of course... because, the level of shame from sexual deviancy is equal to the level of deviancy and there is NO SEXUAL DEVIANCY THAT DEVIATES FARTHER FROM THE HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL STANDARD... THAT HOMOSEXUALITY.

LOL!

You can NOT make this crap up! They're HELPLESS!

You're the only one who thinks it's shameful.....well, you and Ted Haggard.

Well... to be fair... me and 1.49 Billion Facebook users.

Not that many people in the country dumbass. Are you smoking crack?

Oh... how sad for you. You're confused again...

Well. to bring you into the light, we're discussing international support for Degeneracy on the premier social media: OKA: FACEBOOK

 

[Carla_Danger]

Well... to be fair... me and 1.49 Billion Facebook users.

You've talked to all of them about gay sex?

No... But like me, they had the opportunity to use the rainbow filter to join in support with degeneracy and chose NOT TO DO SO.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

 

[BULLDOG]

Congratulations on a million new followers!

Oh... So in an attempt to injure me, the Prog feels that one sure way to do so is to project shameful behavior upon me?

And what shameful behavior is it projecting? Why Homosexuality of course... because, the level of shame from sexual deviancy is equal to the level of deviancy and there is NO SEXUAL DEVIANCY THAT DEVIATES FARTHER FROM THE HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL STANDARD... THAT HOMOSEXUALITY.

LOL!

You can NOT make this crap up! They're HELPLESS!

You're the only one who thinks it's shameful.....well, you and Ted Haggard.

Well... to be fair... me and 1.49 Billion Facebook users.

Not that many people in the country dumbass. Are you smoking crack?

Oh... how sad for you. You're confised again...

Well. to bring you into the light, we're discussing international support for Degeneracy on the premier social media: OKA: FACEBOOK

Lots of people didn't sign up to follow Sea World. Does that mean they all hate whales? You're an idiot grabbing at straws.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Congratulations on a million new followers!

Oh... So in an attempt to injure me, the Prog feels that one sure way to do so is to project shameful behavior upon me?

And what shameful behavior is it projecting? Why Homosexuality of course... because, the level of shame from sexual deviancy is equal to the level of deviancy and there is NO SEXUAL DEVIANCY THAT DEVIATES FARTHER FROM THE HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL STANDARD... THAT HOMOSEXUALITY.

LOL!

You can NOT make this crap up! They're HELPLESS!

You're the only one who thinks it's shameful.....well, you and Ted Haggard.

Well... to be fair... me and 1.49 Billion Facebook users.

Not that many people in the country dumbass. Are you smoking crack?

Oh... how sad for you. You're confised again...

Well. to bring you into the light, we're discussing international support for Degeneracy on the premier social media: OKA: FACEBOOK

Are you sure he's the one "confised?"

 

[Carla_Danger]

Readers, let's review to get the conversation on track.

Reader, what you've just witnessed is an overt attempt to troll the thread to get it taken off of the Politics forum... because the discussion exposes the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy and Homosexuality in and of itself as immoral, Godless and abhorrent to decency across the board.

Now... the discussion needs to be focused upon the following:

"If you consider yourself a Bible-believing Christian, a follower of Jesus whose chief aim is to glorify God and enjoy him forever, there are important questions I hope you will consider before picking up your flag and cheering on the sexual revolution. These questions aren’t meant to be snarky or merely rhetorical. They are sincere, if pointed, questions that I hope will cause my brothers and sisters with the new rainbow themed avatars to slow down and think about the flag you’re flying.

1. How long have you believed that gay marriage is something to be celebrated?

2. What Bible verses led you to change your mind?

3. How would you make a positive case from Scripture that sexual activity between two persons of the same sex is a blessing to be celebrated?

4. What verses would you use to show that a marriage between two persons of the same sex can adequately depict Christ and the church?

5. Do you think Jesus would have been okay with homosexual behavior between consenting adults in a committed relationship?

6. If so, why did he reassert the Genesis definition of marriage as being one man and one woman?

7. When Jesus spoke against porneia what sins do you think he was forbidding?

8. If some homosexual behavior is acceptable, how do you understand the sinful “exchange” Paul highlights in Romans 1?

9. Do you believe that passages like 1 Corinthians 6:9 and Revelation 21:8 teach that sexual immorality can keep you out of heaven?

10. What sexual sins do you think they were referring to?

11. As you think about the long history of the church and the near universal disapproval of same-sex sexual activity, what do you think you understand about the Bible that Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin, and Luther failed to grasp?

12. What arguments would you use to explain to Christians in Africa, Asia, and South America that their understanding of homosexuality is biblically incorrect and your new understanding of homosexuality is not culturally conditioned?

13. Do you think Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were motivated by personal animus and bigotry when they, for almost all of their lives, defined marriage as a covenant relationship between one man and one woman?

14. Do you think children do best with a mother and a father?

15. If not, what research would you point to in support of that conclusion?

16. If yes, does the church or the state have any role to play in promoting or privileging the arrangement that puts children with a mom and a dad?

17. Does the end and purpose of marriage point to something more than an adult’s emotional and sexual fulfillment?

18. How would you define marriage?

19. Do you think close family members should be allowed to get married?

20. Should marriage be limited to only two people?

21. On what basis, if any, would you prevent consenting adults of any relation and of any number from getting married?

22. Should there be an age requirement in this country for obtaining a marriage license?

23. Does equality entail that anyone wanting to be married should be able to have any meaningful relationship defined as marriage?

24. If not, why not?

25. Should your brothers and sisters in Christ who disagree with homosexual practice be allowed to exercise their religious beliefs without fear of punishment, retribution, or coercion?

26. Will you speak up for your fellow Christians when their jobs, their accreditation, their reputation, and their freedoms are threatened because of this issue?

27. Will you speak out against shaming and bullying of all kinds, whether against gays and lesbians or against Evangelicals and Catholics?

28. Since the evangelical church has often failed to take unbiblical divorces and other sexual sins seriously, what steps will you take to ensure that gay marriages are healthy and accord with Scriptural principles?

29. Should gay couples in open relationships be subject to church discipline?

30. Is it a sin for LGBT persons to engage in sexual activity outside of marriage?

31. What will open and affirming churches do to speak prophetically against divorce, fornication, pornography, and adultery wherever they are found?

32. If “love wins,” how would you define love?

33. What verses would you use to establish that definition?

34. How should obedience to God’s commands shape our understanding of love?

35. Do you believe it is possible to love someone and disagree with important decisions they make?

36. If supporting gay marriage is a change for you, has anything else changed in your understanding of faith?

37. As an evangelical, how has your support for gay marriage helped you become more passionate about traditional evangelical distinctives like a focus on being born again, the substitutionary sacrifice of Christ on the cross, the total trustworthiness of the Bible, and the urgent need to evangelize the lost?

38. What open and affirming churches would you point to where people are being converted to orthodox Christianity, sinners are being warned of judgment and called to repentance, and missionaries are being sent out to plant churches among unreached peoples?

39. Do you hope to be more committed to the church, more committed to Christ, and more committed to the Scriptures in the years ahead?

40. When Paul at the end of Romans 1 rebukes “those who practice such things” and those who “give approval to those who practice them,” what sins do you think he has in mind?"

40 Questions for Christians Now Waving Rainbow Flags TGC

[/QUOTE]


Yes, let's review...

I have some questions of my own.

Why does Where_r_my_brains constantly think about gay sex?

Why does Where_r_my_brains constantly post about gay sex?

Why does Where_r_my_brains preach about gay sex, not unlike Ted Haggard?

Why is Where_r_my_brains obsessed with sniffing the crotches of gay people?

Why do so many Christian's who rant about homosexuals, turn out to be gay?

Just curious...

Top 5 Anti-Gay Ministers Accused Of Being Homosexual News One

 

[BULLDOG]

Readers, let's review to get the conversation on track.

Reader, what you've just witnessed is an overt attempt to troll the thread to get it taken off of the Politics forum... because the discussion exposes the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy and Homosexuality in and of itself as immoral, Godless and abhorrent to decency across the board.

Now... the discussion needs to be focused upon the following:

"If you consider yourself a Bible-believing Christian, a follower of Jesus whose chief aim is to glorify God and enjoy him forever, there are important questions I hope you will consider before picking up your flag and cheering on the sexual revolution. These questions aren’t meant to be snarky or merely rhetorical. They are sincere, if pointed, questions that I hope will cause my brothers and sisters with the new rainbow themed avatars to slow down and think about the flag you’re flying.

1. How long have you believed that gay marriage is something to be celebrated?

2. What Bible verses led you to change your mind?

3. How would you make a positive case from Scripture that sexual activity between two persons of the same sex is a blessing to be celebrated?

4. What verses would you use to show that a marriage between two persons of the same sex can adequately depict Christ and the church?

5. Do you think Jesus would have been okay with homosexual behavior between consenting adults in a committed relationship?

6. If so, why did he reassert the Genesis definition of marriage as being one man and one woman?

7. When Jesus spoke against porneia what sins do you think he was forbidding?

8. If some homosexual behavior is acceptable, how do you understand the sinful “exchange” Paul highlights in Romans 1?

9. Do you believe that passages like 1 Corinthians 6:9 and Revelation 21:8 teach that sexual immorality can keep you out of heaven?

10. What sexual sins do you think they were referring to?

11. As you think about the long history of the church and the near universal disapproval of same-sex sexual activity, what do you think you understand about the Bible that Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin, and Luther failed to grasp?

12. What arguments would you use to explain to Christians in Africa, Asia, and South America that their understanding of homosexuality is biblically incorrect and your new understanding of homosexuality is not culturally conditioned?

13. Do you think Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were motivated by personal animus and bigotry when they, for almost all of their lives, defined marriage as a covenant relationship between one man and one woman?

14. Do you think children do best with a mother and a father?

15. If not, what research would you point to in support of that conclusion?

16. If yes, does the church or the state have any role to play in promoting or privileging the arrangement that puts children with a mom and a dad?

17. Does the end and purpose of marriage point to something more than an adult’s emotional and sexual fulfillment?

18. How would you define marriage?

19. Do you think close family members should be allowed to get married?

20. Should marriage be limited to only two people?

21. On what basis, if any, would you prevent consenting adults of any relation and of any number from getting married?

22. Should there be an age requirement in this country for obtaining a marriage license?

23. Does equality entail that anyone wanting to be married should be able to have any meaningful relationship defined as marriage?

24. If not, why not?

25. Should your brothers and sisters in Christ who disagree with homosexual practice be allowed to exercise their religious beliefs without fear of punishment, retribution, or coercion?

26. Will you speak up for your fellow Christians when their jobs, their accreditation, their reputation, and their freedoms are threatened because of this issue?

27. Will you speak out against shaming and bullying of all kinds, whether against gays and lesbians or against Evangelicals and Catholics?

28. Since the evangelical church has often failed to take unbiblical divorces and other sexual sins seriously, what steps will you take to ensure that gay marriages are healthy and accord with Scriptural principles?

29. Should gay couples in open relationships be subject to church discipline?

30. Is it a sin for LGBT persons to engage in sexual activity outside of marriage?

31. What will open and affirming churches do to speak prophetically against divorce, fornication, pornography, and adultery wherever they are found?

32. If “love wins,” how would you define love?

33. What verses would you use to establish that definition?

34. How should obedience to God’s commands shape our understanding of love?

35. Do you believe it is possible to love someone and disagree with important decisions they make?

36. If supporting gay marriage is a change for you, has anything else changed in your understanding of faith?

37. As an evangelical, how has your support for gay marriage helped you become more passionate about traditional evangelical distinctives like a focus on being born again, the substitutionary sacrifice of Christ on the cross, the total trustworthiness of the Bible, and the urgent need to evangelize the lost?

38. What open and affirming churches would you point to where people are being converted to orthodox Christianity, sinners are being warned of judgment and called to repentance, and missionaries are being sent out to plant churches among unreached peoples?

39. Do you hope to be more committed to the church, more committed to Christ, and more committed to the Scriptures in the years ahead?

40. When Paul at the end of Romans 1 rebukes “those who practice such things” and those who “give approval to those who practice them,” what sins do you think he has in mind?"

40 Questions for Christians Now Waving Rainbow Flags TGC

[/QUOTE]


I get it. You're scared of talking about your sexuality, so you found the biggest cut and paste that was handy. Nice diversion attempt, but inquiring minds want to know. With all your insults and crap, are you just a scared little gay boy hoping that all that bravado will hide the fact that you would prefer a hot dog to a steak?

 

[BULLDOG]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

 

[Carla_Danger]

Readers, let's review to get the conversation on track.

What you're witnessing is an overt attempt by the Homo-cult to troll the thread to get it taken off of the Politics forum... and into the obscure flame forums...

But the important thing, is WHY they're doing it and they're doing it because the discussion exposes the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy and Homosexuality, in and of itself, as immoral, Godless and abhorrent to decency across the board.

Um, this isn't in the "Politics" forum, you posted this in "Current Events" for some strange reason.

Preach it Ted, preach it!

 

[Carla_Danger]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

Oh, he's got another thread titled "Yes, Gay Marriage Hurts Me Personally." LOL!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

There is no potential for a right to promote degeneracy.

But let's help YOU prove it... shall we?

Now, degeneracy is what?

Degeneracy is the state or property of being degenerate.

Huh...

Degenerate: having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.

So, knowing that... please explain to the Reader, on what your "Right to promote Degeneracy" rests...

 

[BULLDOG]

Explain what you mean by Federal Licensing of Degeneracy and Homosexuality. That's a pretty dumb sounding statement. Exactly what license are you talking about?

 

[BULLDOG]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

Oh, he's got another thread titled "Yes, Gay Marriage Hurts Me Personally." LOL!

He's just another idiot.

 

[BULLDOG]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

There is no potential for a right to promote degeneracy.

But let's help YOU prove it... shall we?

Now, degeneracy is what?

Degeneracy is the state or property of being degenerate.

Huh...

Degenerate: having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.

So, knowing that... please explain to the Reader, on what your "Right to promote Degeneracy" rests...

Tell me all about the license goof.

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm asking about something you said goober. Are you going to hide from that?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

There is no potential for a right to promote degeneracy.

But let's help YOU prove it... shall we?

Now, degeneracy is what?

Degeneracy is the state or property of being degenerate.

Huh...

Degenerate: having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.

So, knowing that... please explain to the Reader, on what your "Right to promote Degeneracy" rests...

Tell me all about the license goof.

Can't do it?

Well, ok... that fair enough. I asked because it was clear that you could not.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

And there ya have it...

Now Reader, as the above would-be "Contributor" has now established: That there is no right to promote degeneracy, we can readily see that is no means to 'deny' such a right.

And THAT is how you let your opposition refute their own drivel.

Pretty cool, huh?

 

[BULLDOG]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

There is no potential for a right to promote degeneracy.

But let's help YOU prove it... shall we?

Now, degeneracy is what?

Degeneracy is the state or property of being degenerate.

Huh...

Degenerate: having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.

So, knowing that... please explain to the Reader, on what your "Right to promote Degeneracy" rests...

Tell me all about the license goof.

Can't do it? Fair enough.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

And there ya have it...

Now Reader, as the above would-be "Contributor" has now established: That there is no right to promote degeneracy, we can readily see that is no means to 'deny' such a right.

And THAT is how you let your opposition refute their own drivel.

Pretty cool, huh?

Nothing is noted. Tell me about the license.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Nothing is noted.

LOL! Ain't delusion grand?

Tell me about the license.

You're asking about the SCOTUS 'ruling' wherein the 5 Leftists simply voted up a 'Fundamental Right to Marry'... which was the US Federal government Licensing Degeneracy.

If you're going to participate in these discussions, you should at least keep up with the current events.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Ok lets get into your subject. Why do you think it is your job to deny rights to others when it doesn't effect you in any way? Do you think this is a theocracy? If not, why do you think your religion should define our laws?

There is no potential for a right to promote degeneracy.

But let's help YOU prove it... shall we?

Now, degeneracy is what?

Degeneracy is the state or property of being degenerate.

Huh...

Degenerate: having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.

So, knowing that... please explain to the Reader, on what your "Right to promote Degeneracy" rests...

Stop it, you sound like one of those repressed screamers!


LOL....this is funny!

 

[BULLDOG]

Nothing is noted.

LOL! Ain't delusion grand?

Tell me about the license.

You're asking about the SCOTUS 'ruling' wherein the 5 Leftists simply voted up a 'Fundamental Right to Marry'... which was the US Federal government Licensing Degeneracy.

If you're going to participate in these discussions, you should at least keep up with the current events.

Well that is dumber than most of your crap. How exactly did you determine that it was degeneracy? Your religious beliefs don't count because this isn't a theocracy. Define degenerate in a logical way goober.