Clarence Thomas drank heavily, watched porn

[Si modo]

Stop the presses! A man's ex is trashing him.

Extra, extra! A man likes porn!

*yawn*

Amazes me, the pretzel shapes *some* con women turn themselves into in defense of this misogynistic asshole.

It amazes me what the insane call defense.

For the slow, I will expand on my post. An ex-girlfriend is trashing a public figure. The amount of credibility I put on that source being an objective source is less than the amount of calves liver I eat in a year. And, whenever exes trashing the significant other become worthy of attention anywhere other than some grocery store gossip rag, I ridicule it.

And, I have no idea how many men you know, but one liking porn doesn't surprise me in the least.

As I said...major yawn. Get back to me when there is substance.

 

[Madeline]

Anita Hill should still apologize for her participation in the "Hi-Tech lynching" she participated in with the Democrats.

De-lus-ion-al, The T. Pretty clearly, Professor Hill spoke the naked truth. Add lying to all of Thomas' other fine qualities.

 

[Annie]

try with canards and rosa parks, e.g.

except for the fact that it's Obama and his minions using them...

more irony from the innocent canard spreader.

to the back of the bus, rosie.

Whatever you say.

 

[Si modo]

Stop the presses! A man's ex is trashing him.

Extra, extra! A man likes porn!








*yawn*

And when BillClinton and Gary Condit was in office the conservative press made sure to play up every tryst they both had whether alleged or lies and you believed it like the dumbass Republican you are.

Really? You knew me then? And you knew what I believed?

Interesting.

Tell me more about myself because apparently I am uninformed about my life and my beliefs. I must warn you, though; I am a subject matter expert in my life and my views.

 

[The T]

Anita Hill should still apologize for her participation in the "Hi-Tech lynching" she participated in with the Democrats.

De-lus-ion-al, The T. Pretty clearly, Professor Hill spoke the naked truth. Add lying to all of Thomas' other fine qualities.

I recommend "The Real Anita Hill"...

 

[Flaylo]

It surely is.

try with canards and rosa parks, e.g.

except for the fact that it's Obama and his minions using them...

Don't talk your race card bullshit and not look at the way your own party plays that shit like this for instance

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZO-yllS9So[/ame]


Republicans have been saying that same shit continuously because they're mad blacks will not vote for a party they rightfully see insensitive to them.

 

[Madeline]

Stop the presses! A man's ex is trashing him.

Extra, extra! A man likes porn!

*yawn*

Amazes me, the pretzel shapes *some* con women turn themselves into in defense of this misogynistic asshole.

It amazes me what the insane call defense.

For the slow, I will expand on my post. An ex-girlfriend is trashing a public figure. The amount of credibility I put on that source being an objective source is less than the amount of calves liver I eat in a year. And, whenever exes trashing the significant other become worthy of attention anywhere other than some grocery store gossip rag, I ridicule it.

And, I have no idea how many men you know, but one liking porn doesn't surprise me in the least.

As I said...major yawn. Get back to me when there is substance.

Let's review the allegations, shall we?

* Raging alcoholic

* Porn addict -- in case you are wondering, "liking porn" is far different from an addiction to it.

* Dry drunk who "bullied" his son. If that means abuse, even emotional abuse, that's a serious matter. Unless suddenly kids' well-being and behaving lawfully no longer matter.

* Anger issues

* Obsessive behavior

Now, if you want to say "I do not believe her", fine by me. But saying that even if these allegations are true, you still don't care seems the height of hypocrisy.

BTW, the ex-gf has a new book about Thomas coming out (what a surprise). I doubt she or her publisher would dare to defame a SCOTUS Justice without ironclad proof, but hey, I admit -- I hope every fucking word of her allegations about Thomas is "Dear Diaried" by him.

 

[California Girl]

Stop the presses! A man's ex is trashing him.

Extra, extra! A man likes porn!








*yawn*

And when BillClinton and Gary Condit was in office the conservative press made sure to play up every tryst they both had whether alleged or lies and you believed it like the dumbass Republican you are.

You have proof that Si believed the accusations against Clinton and Condit? Please provide it. Thanks.

 

[Madeline]

Anita Hill should still apologize for her participation in the "Hi-Tech lynching" she participated in with the Democrats.

De-lus-ion-al, The T. Pretty clearly, Professor Hill spoke the naked truth. Add lying to all of Thomas' other fine qualities.

I recommend "The Real Anita Hill"...

Loser, The T. He did it.

Deal.

 

[Madeline]

Stop the presses! A man's ex is trashing him.

Extra, extra! A man likes porn!

*yawn*

And when BillClinton and Gary Condit was in office the conservative press made sure to play up every tryst they both had whether alleged or lies and you believed it like the dumbass Republican you are.

You have proof that Si believed the accusations against Clinton and Condit? Please provide it. Thanks.

How ironic. I certainly did....they form the basis of my nearly-pathological hatred of both Clintons.

 

[California Girl]

Amazes me, the pretzel shapes *some* con women turn themselves into in defense of this misogynistic asshole.

It amazes me what the insane call defense.

For the slow, I will expand on my post. An ex-girlfriend is trashing a public figure. The amount of credibility I put on that source being an objective source is less than the amount of calves liver I eat in a year. And, whenever exes trashing the significant other become worthy of attention anywhere other than some grocery store gossip rag, I ridicule it.

And, I have no idea how many men you know, but one liking porn doesn't surprise me in the least.

As I said...major yawn. Get back to me when there is substance.

Let's review the allegations, shall we?

* Raging alcoholic

* Porn addict -- in case you are wondering, "liking porn" is far different from an addiction to it.

* Dry drunk who "bullied" his son. If that means abuse, even emotional abuse, that's a serious matter. Unless suddenly kids' well-being and behaving lawfully no longer matter.

* Anger issues

* Obsessive behavior

Now, if you want to say "I do not believe her", fine by me. But saying that even if these allegations are true, you still don't care seems the height of hypocrisy.

BTW, the ex-gf has a new book about Thomas coming out (what a surprise). I doubt she or her publisher would dare to defame a SCOTUS Justice without ironclad proof, but hey, I admit -- I hope every fucking word of her allegations about Thomas is "Dear Diaried" by him.

Well, well, well. Color me Shocked Pink. Ex girl-friend has 'written' a book about Thomas.... I wonder if the left will see why we should be skeptical about this crap or will they continue blindly down the path of 'why would she say it if it weren't true'? Cuz the answer to that question would be ......MONEY!

 

[Madeline]

It amazes me what the insane call defense.

For the slow, I will expand on my post. An ex-girlfriend is trashing a public figure. The amount of credibility I put on that source being an objective source is less than the amount of calves liver I eat in a year. And, whenever exes trashing the significant other become worthy of attention anywhere other than some grocery store gossip rag, I ridicule it.

And, I have no idea how many men you know, but one liking porn doesn't surprise me in the least.

As I said...major yawn. Get back to me when there is substance.

Let's review the allegations, shall we?

* Raging alcoholic

* Porn addict -- in case you are wondering, "liking porn" is far different from an addiction to it.

* Dry drunk who "bullied" his son. If that means abuse, even emotional abuse, that's a serious matter. Unless suddenly kids' well-being and behaving lawfully no longer matter.

* Anger issues

* Obsessive behavior

Now, if you want to say "I do not believe her", fine by me. But saying that even if these allegations are true, you still don't care seems the height of hypocrisy.

BTW, the ex-gf has a new book about Thomas coming out (what a surprise). I doubt she or her publisher would dare to defame a SCOTUS Justice without ironclad proof, but hey, I admit -- I hope every fucking word of her allegations about Thomas is "Dear Diaried" by him.

Well, well, well. Color me Shocked Pink. Ex girl-friend has 'written' a book about Thomas.... I wonder if the left will see why we should be skeptical about this crap or will they continue blindly down the path of 'why would she say it if it weren't true'? Cuz the answer to that question would be ......MONEY!

She's an administrative law judge, CG. I am almost positive she earns more than Thomas does....and in any event, so what if she makes money off her book? If these are provable facts, then they are.

Whaca gonna do then?

 

[The T]

De-lus-ion-al, The T. Pretty clearly, Professor Hill spoke the naked truth. Add lying to all of Thomas' other fine qualities.

I recommend "The Real Anita Hill"...

Loser, The T. He did it.

Deal.

Riiiight....

 

[The T]

Let's review the allegations, shall we?

* Raging alcoholic

* Porn addict -- in case you are wondering, "liking porn" is far different from an addiction to it.

* Dry drunk who "bullied" his son. If that means abuse, even emotional abuse, that's a serious matter. Unless suddenly kids' well-being and behaving lawfully no longer matter.

* Anger issues

* Obsessive behavior

Now, if you want to say "I do not believe her", fine by me. But saying that even if these allegations are true, you still don't care seems the height of hypocrisy.

BTW, the ex-gf has a new book about Thomas coming out (what a surprise). I doubt she or her publisher would dare to defame a SCOTUS Justice without ironclad proof, but hey, I admit -- I hope every fucking word of her allegations about Thomas is "Dear Diaried" by him.

Well, well, well. Color me Shocked Pink. Ex girl-friend has 'written' a book about Thomas.... I wonder if the left will see why we should be skeptical about this crap or will they continue blindly down the path of 'why would she say it if it weren't true'? Cuz the answer to that question would be ......MONEY!

She's an administrative law judge, CG. I am almost positive she earns more than Thomas does....and in any event, so what if she makes money off her book? If these are provable facts, then they are.

Whaca gonna do then?

So what? Are we supposed to belive her because of position? Pay? Even Presidents have been caught. Lying.

 

[Madeline]

I recommend "The Real Anita Hill"...

Loser, The T. He did it.

Deal.

Riiiight....

Can I take it from your pathetic attempt to deny reality that if you were satisfied Thomas harrassed Hill, you'd have to agree he is not fit to sit on SCOTUS?

 

[Madeline]

The T wrote:

So what? Are we supposed to belive her because of position? Pay? Even Presidents have been caught. Lying

No, genius. You are supposed to believe she has enough money not to try on defamation of a Supreme Court Justice to make some, and that no publisher would touch her book unless she has *proof* of what she alleges.

 

[Flaylo]

Stop the presses! A man's ex is trashing him.

Extra, extra! A man likes porn!








*yawn*

And when BillClinton and Gary Condit was in office the conservative press made sure to play up every tryst they both had whether alleged or lies and you believed it like the dumbass Republican you are.

You have proof that Si believed the accusations against Clinton and Condit? Please provide it. Thanks.

Do you have prrof that Thomas' ex gf is lying? Please provide it. Thanks.

 

[Madeline]

I ♥ this thread.

 

[California Girl]

And when BillClinton and Gary Condit was in office the conservative press made sure to play up every tryst they both had whether alleged or lies and you believed it like the dumbass Republican you are.

You have proof that Si believed the accusations against Clinton and Condit? Please provide it. Thanks.

Do you have prrof that Thomas' ex gf is lying? Please provide it. Thanks.

Oh, good grief.


She made the claims, sweetie. It is for her to prove them.

What a fucking painfully stupid person you are.

 

[Madeline]

Well, CG, Annie and Si...if the ex-gf's claims are proven, do you agree Thomas lacks the character to sit on SCOTUS or not?

Guess what I think.