Climate Models Wrong Yet Again

The ENSO is very hard to predict. That is why there are several models. And the scientists stated right up front that their models showed a descent into the La Nina, and that did not happen. They also state that they are not real sure of their present forecast. But they definately hit the El Nino that we just experianced. In the meantime, you asses made all kinds of claims of cooling. And now we have had three record years in a row.

And you are still predicting cooling. Mr. Westwall has predicted cooling for ten years here, and has been wrong to ten years. You will be the same.
 
The ENSO is very hard to predict. That is why there are several models. And the scientists stated right up front that their models showed a descent into the La Nina, and that did not happen. They also state that they are not real sure of their present forecast. But they definately hit the El Nino that we just experianced. In the meantime, you asses made all kinds of claims of cooling. And now we have had three record years in a row.

And you are still predicting cooling. Mr. Westwall has predicted cooling for ten years here, and has been wrong to ten years. You will be the same.
Ah, it's very hard to predict.
And yes there was an El Niño. And they were 100% incorrect on its impacts. Percipitation never went to the Southwest but instead stayed in the Northwest.
image.jpeg
 
upload_2016-9-13_20-50-2.png

NOAA is full of BS.. We just passed the threshold of La Niña and it is active. Every other meteorological agency disagrees with the US alarmists.. Three months below -0.5 deg C anomaly officially makes this and active La Niña... And were still on the way down in ocean temps. We haven't hit bottom yet.

The boys over at the Boulder lab have been smoking to much weed..
 
View attachment 89395
NOAA is full of BS.. We just passed the threshold of La Niña and it is active. Every other meteorological agency disagrees with the US alarmists.. Three months below -0.5 deg C anomaly officially makes this and active La Niña... And were still on the way down in ocean temps. We haven't hit bottom yet.

The boys over at the Boulder lab have been smoking to much weed..
image.jpeg
 
View attachment 89395
NOAA is full of BS.. We just passed the threshold of La Niña and it is active. Every other meteorological agency disagrees with the US alarmists.. Three months below -0.5 deg C anomaly officially makes this and active La Niña... And were still on the way down in ocean temps. We haven't hit bottom yet.

The boys over at the Boulder lab have been smoking to much weed..
View attachment 89399

WHY YES.... Yes I am..!
 
Too Funny:

Just went over to the NOAA site and looked at the data they are using.. They have added +0.4 deg C to their readings in an effort to keep them from reflecting the true state of region 3-4. Region 1-2 is again dropping like a rock and region 3 is at moderate levels but will soon follow region 1-2 again..

I cant find what they are using for justification to add temp to the anomaly? Adjusting up the numbers... AGAIN..
 
Too Funny:

Just went over to the NOAA site and looked at the data they are using.. They have added +0.4 deg C to their readings in an effort to keep them from reflecting the true state of region 3-4. Region 1-2 is again dropping like a rock and region 3 is at moderate levels but will soon follow region 1-2 again..

I cant find what they are using for justification to add temp to the anomaly? Adjusting up the numbers... AGAIN..


Justification.....JUSTIFICATION.....they don't need no steenkin justification.
 
Damn multi-billion dollar satellites are worthless for predicting the weather; too many dynamic variables.
 
Climate models are historically incorrect. Its not even debatable. But these alarmist say "the science is settled" basing all their future prognostications on computer models. Computer models provide no rational basis for any predictions about future global average temperature and consequently no rational basis for any policy related to such predictions.

Bozo's................ :2up:

The models are wrong | Behind The Black

Climate Models Have Been Wrong About Global Warming For Six Decades

3 ways ‘climate change’ models are dead wrong


The climate alarmists throw out the established talking point crap all the time.......and the uninformed will sometimes buy it. But if you look at the empirical data closely, you quickly realize its all a ruse.




Who's not winning?:coffee:
 
Climate models are historically incorrect. Its not even debatable. But these alarmist say "the science is settled" basing all their future prognostications on computer models. Computer models provide no rational basis for any predictions about future global average temperature and consequently no rational basis for any policy related to such predictions.

Bozo's................ :2up:

The models are wrong | Behind The Black

Climate Models Have Been Wrong About Global Warming For Six Decades

3 ways ‘climate change’ models are dead wrong


The climate alarmists throw out the established talking point crap all the time.......and the uninformed will sometimes buy it. But if you look at the empirical data closely, you quickly realize its all a ruse.




Who's not winning?:coffee:
Computer models created by people who have an expected outcome.
 

Forum List

Back
Top