Clinton Is Winning By "Dictatorship"

[Yarddog]

Hillary can tie or lose a state to Bernie but she gets the delegates. That's a microcosm of the modern leftists. It's establishment cronyism funded by mega corporation donors that grow wealthier every year. They get away with it because they've been successful in duping the sleep walking masses that they are for the people and Republicans are for big business.The Jackass party is filled with those doing the same thing expecting different results.

Sure , you have to break a few eggs to make an omlete, and Hillary has to crush her moral compass under her boot heel to create a paradise "ahem" for everyone

 

[Yarddog]

Some on the Left KNOW what the Clinton's represent...and some don't. Nader does...

Ralph Nader: Trump’s Done Some Good, Clinton’s Winning By ‘Dictatorship’
In a story published in US News, Nader said that Hillary Clinton is "going to win by dictatorship" in the Democratic race against Bernie Sanders.

"Twenty-five percent of superdelegates are cronies, mostly. They weren't elected," Nader, an activist and former Green Party presidential candidate, said on Friday.

"They were there in order to stop somebody like Bernie Sanders, who would win by the vote."

Nader actually had some good words to say about Trump, saying the Donald has brought some important issues to the fore. "He's questioned the trade agreements. He's done some challenging of Wall Street – I don't know how authentic that is. He said he's against the carried interest racket, for hedge funds. He's funded himself and therefore attacked special interest money, which is very important," Nader says. "But he's lowered the level of political debate to unheard-of depths of salacious, slanderous and vacuousness, garnished with massive self-boosterism and repetition."

On the other hand, Nader unleashed on Hillary, whom he accused of being a "corporatist, militarist Democrat" who would have been defeated by Sanders if every state held an open primary. Nader also said that he thinks Sanders "made very few mistakes" during his White House bid and would present a bigger challenge to presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.

"You never know when the shoe's going to drop on either of them," Nader says of Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton.

lol

You can’t be serious.

One person’s errant, subjective opinion in no way constitutes ‘fact.’

Nader is as much a liar and loon as most others on the right.

The Democratic party wants Hillary, I would rather have Sanders in office than Hillary, because at least you know what you have. The Dems arnt going to let a few votes get in the way of their dreams

 

[eddiew]

Some on the Left KNOW what the Clinton's represent...and some don't. Nader does...

Ralph Nader: Trump’s Done Some Good, Clinton’s Winning By ‘Dictatorship’
In a story published in US News, Nader said that Hillary Clinton is "going to win by dictatorship" in the Democratic race against Bernie Sanders.

"Twenty-five percent of superdelegates are cronies, mostly. They weren't elected," Nader, an activist and former Green Party presidential candidate, said on Friday.

"They were there in order to stop somebody like Bernie Sanders, who would win by the vote."

Nader actually had some good words to say about Trump, saying the Donald has brought some important issues to the fore. "He's questioned the trade agreements. He's done some challenging of Wall Street – I don't know how authentic that is. He said he's against the carried interest racket, for hedge funds. He's funded himself and therefore attacked special interest money, which is very important," Nader says. "But he's lowered the level of political debate to unheard-of depths of salacious, slanderous and vacuousness, garnished with massive self-boosterism and repetition."

On the other hand, Nader unleashed on Hillary, whom he accused of being a "corporatist, militarist Democrat" who would have been defeated by Sanders if every state held an open primary. Nader also said that he thinks Sanders "made very few mistakes" during his White House bid and would present a bigger challenge to presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.

"You never know when the shoe's going to drop on either of them," Nader says of Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton.

lol

You can’t be serious.

One person’s errant, subjective opinion in no way constitutes ‘fact.’

Nader is as much a liar and loon as most others on the right.

Translation.

If Nader dumped on Trump, you would be trumpeting it to the world.

I wasn't too happy with Perot either Nader is a slime bag period,,,,,, imo

 

[HappyJoy]

I'm not sure who is done with Nader more, Libertarians for his views on consumer protections or liberals who lost 2000 because of a one trick pony.

 

[gipper]

Some on the Left KNOW what the Clinton's represent...and some don't. Nader does...

Ralph Nader: Trump’s Done Some Good, Clinton’s Winning By ‘Dictatorship’
In a story published in US News, Nader said that Hillary Clinton is "going to win by dictatorship" in the Democratic race against Bernie Sanders.

"Twenty-five percent of superdelegates are cronies, mostly. They weren't elected," Nader, an activist and former Green Party presidential candidate, said on Friday.

"They were there in order to stop somebody like Bernie Sanders, who would win by the vote."

Nader actually had some good words to say about Trump, saying the Donald has brought some important issues to the fore. "He's questioned the trade agreements. He's done some challenging of Wall Street – I don't know how authentic that is. He said he's against the carried interest racket, for hedge funds. He's funded himself and therefore attacked special interest money, which is very important," Nader says. "But he's lowered the level of political debate to unheard-of depths of salacious, slanderous and vacuousness, garnished with massive self-boosterism and repetition."

On the other hand, Nader unleashed on Hillary, whom he accused of being a "corporatist, militarist Democrat" who would have been defeated by Sanders if every state held an open primary. Nader also said that he thinks Sanders "made very few mistakes" during his White House bid and would present a bigger challenge to presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.

"You never know when the shoe's going to drop on either of them," Nader says of Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton.

lol

You can’t be serious.

One person’s errant, subjective opinion in no way constitutes ‘fact.’

Nader is as much a liar and loon as most others on the right.

Translation.

If Nader dumped on Trump, you would be trumpeting it to the world.

I wasn't too happy with Perot either Nader is a slime bag period,,,,,, imo

Slime bags can speak the truth...and Nader certainly is doing that now.

 

[oreo]

Some on the Left KNOW what the Clinton's represent...and some don't. Nader does...

Ralph Nader: Trump’s Done Some Good, Clinton’s Winning By ‘Dictatorship’
In a story published in US News, Nader said that Hillary Clinton is "going to win by dictatorship" in the Democratic race against Bernie Sanders.

"Twenty-five percent of superdelegates are cronies, mostly. They weren't elected," Nader, an activist and former Green Party presidential candidate, said on Friday.

"They were there in order to stop somebody like Bernie Sanders, who would win by the vote."

Nader actually had some good words to say about Trump, saying the Donald has brought some important issues to the fore. "He's questioned the trade agreements. He's done some challenging of Wall Street – I don't know how authentic that is. He said he's against the carried interest racket, for hedge funds. He's funded himself and therefore attacked special interest money, which is very important," Nader says. "But he's lowered the level of political debate to unheard-of depths of salacious, slanderous and vacuousness, garnished with massive self-boosterism and repetition."

On the other hand, Nader unleashed on Hillary, whom he accused of being a "corporatist, militarist Democrat" who would have been defeated by Sanders if every state held an open primary. Nader also said that he thinks Sanders "made very few mistakes" during his White House bid and would present a bigger challenge to presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.

"You never know when the shoe's going to drop on either of them," Nader says of Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton.

Nadar is another radical--I believe he ran a couple of times--and got kicked to the curb by Democrats, as is what happened with Bernie Sanders.

There are 714 Democrat Super Delegates for a reason. 1984- Reagan V Mondale was the reason for the institution of these Super Delegates. They're there to insure that this never happens again.

Now if Bernie Sanders were the nominee of the Democrat Party all you would need to do is move the blue part over to the USSR of Vermont & New Hampshire--and the rest of this country would turn RED. The electoral college results would be the same and Donald Trump would be the next POTUS. Why? you ask.

This country is center, it always has been and it always will be. It will not elect far left, or far right candidates, much less a recognized and confirmed socialist, Bernie Sanders. While Sanders has done a great job of exploiting the political ignorance of his supporters, he also knows with absolute certainty, that none of his proposals have a snow balls chance of getting through the congress. Not even the most liberal Democrat in Washington D.C would ever vote for free college tuition, and adding an additional 29 trillion dollars to Federal Government spending when we're already 19 trillion in red ink, let alone any Republican.

So basically the 714 Democrat Super Delegates are there to keep 1984 from ever happening again, and to level out the ignorance of the American public as to who is electable and who is not.

And after Donald Trump gets slaughtered by Hillary Clinton--I imagine that the Republican party will think about adding in Republican Super Delegates to their primaries also.

And before I hear one more of you idiots mention a National Poll showing Sanders beating Trump by 20+ points or so. I want you to remember that the real poll is out and it came to us from an actual ballot where Hillary Clinton is ahead of Sanders by 3 million+ votes, and ahead of Trump by 1 million votes. Sanders comes in last place.

National polling data has turned into a world wide disaster. No one picks up on unknown callers anymore, and most of us have cell phones that pollsters have no access too. The two candidates that continually mention the polls are Trump and Sanders. While Trump also does very well in the polls, oddly enough he also has the highest unfavorable rating of any candidate in this nations history. Obviously the only ones participating in these polls are Sanders & Trump supporters. Here is a great article on this.
Flaws in Polling Data Exposed as U.S. Campaign Season Heats Up