Clinton posts big gains in online betting markets after strong debate performance

kiwiman127

Comfortably Moderate
Oct 19, 2010
11,802
3,429
350
4th Cleanest City in the World-Minneapolis
Being as the Trumpsters are claiming highly inaccurate online polls, which are famous for ballot stuffing, show Trump winning the debate.
BUT, people putting their money where there mouth is and where there is no ballot stuffing say different.
===================================================================================
"US Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s probability of winning the White House gained in online betting markets following the first debate of the campaign on Monday night between her and Republican Donald Trump.

A Clinton contract on the popular PredictIt betting market gained 6 cents from the previous day’s level to 69 cents, while a contract favoring Donald Trump’s prospects for victory tumbled 7 cents to 31 cents. Contracts are priced from 0 cents to 100 cents, with the contract price equating to a probability of whether that candidate will win the Nov. 8 election.

The price swings for both candidates were the largest since early August, and placed Clinton’s lead in that market at the widest in about two weeks.

Clinton’s prospects also improved on the Irish betting site Paddy Power.

About halfway through Monday’s debate, she was shown as a 1-to-2 favorite, and those odds shortened to 4-to-9 in the moments after the debate ended. Trump’s odds lengthened to 23-to-10 from 9-to-4.

The swing following the debate put the brakes on a big Trump price rally on PredictIt that coincided with a tightening in most public opinion polls. The implied probability of him winning had risen to 38 cents on Sunday from just 28 cents at the end of August."
Business News World - Clinton posts big gains in online betting markets after strong debate performance
 
Being as the Trumpsters are claiming highly inaccurate online polls, which are famous for ballot stuffing, show Trump winning the debate.
BUT, people putting their money where there mouth is and where there is no ballot stuffing say different.
===================================================================================
"US Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s probability of winning the White House gained in online betting markets following the first debate of the campaign on Monday night between her and Republican Donald Trump.

A Clinton contract on the popular PredictIt betting market gained 6 cents from the previous day’s level to 69 cents, while a contract favoring Donald Trump’s prospects for victory tumbled 7 cents to 31 cents. Contracts are priced from 0 cents to 100 cents, with the contract price equating to a probability of whether that candidate will win the Nov. 8 election.

The price swings for both candidates were the largest since early August, and placed Clinton’s lead in that market at the widest in about two weeks.

Clinton’s prospects also improved on the Irish betting site Paddy Power.

About halfway through Monday’s debate, she was shown as a 1-to-2 favorite, and those odds shortened to 4-to-9 in the moments after the debate ended. Trump’s odds lengthened to 23-to-10 from 9-to-4.

The swing following the debate put the brakes on a big Trump price rally on PredictIt that coincided with a tightening in most public opinion polls. The implied probability of him winning had risen to 38 cents on Sunday from just 28 cents at the end of August."
Business News World - Clinton posts big gains in online betting markets after strong debate performance
So GLOBAL "betting markets" are more reliable than actual polls?

This is embarrassingly stupid logic.
 
Being as the Trumpsters are claiming highly inaccurate online polls, which are famous for ballot stuffing, show Trump winning the debate.
BUT, people putting their money where there mouth is and where there is no ballot stuffing say different.
===================================================================================
"US Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s probability of winning the White House gained in online betting markets following the first debate of the campaign on Monday night between her and Republican Donald Trump.

A Clinton contract on the popular PredictIt betting market gained 6 cents from the previous day’s level to 69 cents, while a contract favoring Donald Trump’s prospects for victory tumbled 7 cents to 31 cents. Contracts are priced from 0 cents to 100 cents, with the contract price equating to a probability of whether that candidate will win the Nov. 8 election.

The price swings for both candidates were the largest since early August, and placed Clinton’s lead in that market at the widest in about two weeks.

Clinton’s prospects also improved on the Irish betting site Paddy Power.

About halfway through Monday’s debate, she was shown as a 1-to-2 favorite, and those odds shortened to 4-to-9 in the moments after the debate ended. Trump’s odds lengthened to 23-to-10 from 9-to-4.

The swing following the debate put the brakes on a big Trump price rally on PredictIt that coincided with a tightening in most public opinion polls. The implied probability of him winning had risen to 38 cents on Sunday from just 28 cents at the end of August."
Business News World - Clinton posts big gains in online betting markets after strong debate performance
So GLOBAL "betting markets" are more reliable than actual polls?

This is embarrassingly stupid logic.

Says a moron who thinks online polls are accurate! You Trumpsters kill me with your ignorance. :laugh:
Well after-all, Trump did say he loves the less educated voter.
 
Being as the Trumpsters are claiming highly inaccurate online polls, which are famous for ballot stuffing, show Trump winning the debate.
BUT, people putting their money where there mouth is and where there is no ballot stuffing say different.
===================================================================================
"US Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s probability of winning the White House gained in online betting markets following the first debate of the campaign on Monday night between her and Republican Donald Trump.

A Clinton contract on the popular PredictIt betting market gained 6 cents from the previous day’s level to 69 cents, while a contract favoring Donald Trump’s prospects for victory tumbled 7 cents to 31 cents. Contracts are priced from 0 cents to 100 cents, with the contract price equating to a probability of whether that candidate will win the Nov. 8 election.

The price swings for both candidates were the largest since early August, and placed Clinton’s lead in that market at the widest in about two weeks.

Clinton’s prospects also improved on the Irish betting site Paddy Power.

About halfway through Monday’s debate, she was shown as a 1-to-2 favorite, and those odds shortened to 4-to-9 in the moments after the debate ended. Trump’s odds lengthened to 23-to-10 from 9-to-4.

The swing following the debate put the brakes on a big Trump price rally on PredictIt that coincided with a tightening in most public opinion polls. The implied probability of him winning had risen to 38 cents on Sunday from just 28 cents at the end of August."
Business News World - Clinton posts big gains in online betting markets after strong debate performance
So GLOBAL "betting markets" are more reliable than actual polls?

This is embarrassingly stupid logic.

Says a moron who thinks online polls are accurate! You Trumpsters kill me with your ignorance. :laugh:
Well after-all, Trump did say he loves the less educated voter.
Online AMERICAN polls are 100,000 times more accurate than using betting odds from idiot Europeans who can't breathe without the BBC telling them how.
 

Forum List

Back
Top