🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House

As always, liberals are terrified of the truth coming out. The truth never serves their agenda. They will lie, cheat, steal, and kill to prevent such a disaster.

--------------------------------------------------------

Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago

Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
February 10, 2001|From the Washington Post

WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.

The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.

But Walters was told by the White House counsel's office that the items he asked about--which included an iron-and-glass coffee table, a painted TV armoire, a custom wood gaming table and a wicker table with wood top--were "personal gifts received by the Clintons prior to President Clinton assuming office."

Personal property brought to the White House by an incoming president does not have to be disclosed on financial reports. As a result of the counsel's determination, the furnishings were sent on to the Clinton's new home in Chappaqua, N.Y.

However, government records show that the gifts that concerned Walters did not arrive at the White House until after the Clintons moved in. At least one of these items, a Ficks-Reed wicker table, was logged in at the White House on Feb. 8, 1993. The widow of the manufacturer, Joy Ficks, said last week that it was meant for the White House, not the Clintons.

This week, the Clintons returned the four items to the White House, along with other furnishings, after questions were raised about whether they actually belonged to the Clintons. All the furnishings had been designated official White House property by the Park Service in 1993.

Julia Payne, a spokeswoman for the former president, said the Clintons wanted to be "over cautious" in light of the concerns that had been raised. Despite the questions posed by Walters, Payne said the Clintons or their interior decorator acquired the four items in Little Rock, Ark., before they came to Washington.

Kaki Hockersmith, the interior decorator, did not return repeated calls this week seeking comment.

The Clintons came under strong criticism after disclosing that they were taking with them $190,000 in gifts received over the last eight years. GOP lawmakers and others criticized Hillary Rodham Clinton in particular for accepting many presents just before she joined the Senate and became covered by strict ethics rules that prohibit accepting gifts worth more than $50.
 
As always, liberals are terrified of the truth coming out. The truth never serves their agenda. They will lie, cheat, steal, and kill to prevent such a disaster.

--------------------------------------------------------

Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago

Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
February 10, 2001|From the Washington Post

WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons' newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items.

The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton's first year in office.

But Walters was told by the White House counsel's office that the items he asked about--which included an iron-and-glass coffee table, a painted TV armoire, a custom wood gaming table and a wicker table with wood top--were "personal gifts received by the Clintons prior to President Clinton assuming office."

Personal property brought to the White House by an incoming president does not have to be disclosed on financial reports. As a result of the counsel's determination, the furnishings were sent on to the Clinton's new home in Chappaqua, N.Y.

However, government records show that the gifts that concerned Walters did not arrive at the White House until after the Clintons moved in. At least one of these items, a Ficks-Reed wicker table, was logged in at the White House on Feb. 8, 1993. The widow of the manufacturer, Joy Ficks, said last week that it was meant for the White House, not the Clintons.

This week, the Clintons returned the four items to the White House, along with other furnishings, after questions were raised about whether they actually belonged to the Clintons. All the furnishings had been designated official White House property by the Park Service in 1993.

Julia Payne, a spokeswoman for the former president, said the Clintons wanted to be "over cautious" in light of the concerns that had been raised. Despite the questions posed by Walters, Payne said the Clintons or their interior decorator acquired the four items in Little Rock, Ark., before they came to Washington.

Kaki Hockersmith, the interior decorator, did not return repeated calls this week seeking comment.

The Clintons came under strong criticism after disclosing that they were taking with them $190,000 in gifts received over the last eight years. GOP lawmakers and others criticized Hillary Rodham Clinton in particular for accepting many presents just before she joined the Senate and became covered by strict ethics rules that prohibit accepting gifts worth more than $50.
You want lied cheat and steal ?? idiot?? Lied us into a war cheated America of billions given to cheneys company HAL and stole the lives of 1000's of brave Americans If cheney and the moron bush were dems you'd be calling for their hangings
 
The assorted afro americans that Barry Hussaine "Obama" let in there, who knows what stuff will be stolen before The Donald has a team of professional fumigators clear it of the stench.

Getting the Jheri Curl off the furniture will cost at least 10k......
 
Just like they took the "W" keys off the keyboards, right? :lol:
Actually the Clinton staff did do that.

"NY Times:
White House Vandalized In Transition, G.A.O. Finds
By ROBERT PEAR
Published: June 12, 2002


WASHINGTON, June 11— The General Accounting Office, an investigative arm of Congress, said today that ''damage, theft, vandalism and pranks did occur in the White House complex'' in the presidential transition from Bill Clinton to George W. Bush. The agency put the cost at $13,000 to $14,000, including $4,850 to replace computer keyboards, many with damaged or missing W keys.. Some of the damage, it said, was clearly intentional."

:p
white-house-vandalized-in-transition-gao-finds.html
The people doing it were White House staffers, not the Clintons.

You mean those that Clinton was in charge over? Those staffers? Lol!
 
No Democrat cares if the Clinton's stole, lied, cheated, raped or murdered anyone, they dismiss it all. They are all hypocrites.
And people like you and other repubs make it even and the donations they got the gifts they got isn't stealing and they returned what was appropriate You fn pubs caused so much misery in this country I'd have thought you'd shut your anti american mouths I was wrong

Not a Republican, haven't been one for a long time. It is partisan nut jobs such as yourself that continue to elect Wall St. bitches and then cry when they cause a greater separation between the shrinking middle class and the rich, you by your vote support it. And you are to fucking dumb to realize it. Instead of breaking away and standing on your own...you keep voting for the two party idiots and then whine.

Spare me your BS. You caused much of this by your stupid selfish choices.
 
So the Clintons stole from and vandalized the People's house like common punks and thieves, or corrupt Arkansas hillbillies, and liberals want to let them back in....great.
 
So the Clintons stole from and vandalized the People's house like common punks and thieves, or corrupt Arkansas hillbillies, and liberals want to let them back in....great.
You garbage picking dem haters always make mountains out of mole hills
 
Yeah, stealing over $100k worth of stuff from the WH on the way out is nothing...to a liberal as long as a liberal as long as a liberal is doing it.

Hillary and Bill are thieves...failed / incompetent thieves at that. They got caught, had to return much of what they stole, and had to pay for the rest.
 
Yeah, stealing over $100k worth of stuff from the WH on the way out is nothing...to a liberal as long as a liberal as long as a liberal is doing it.

Hillary and Bill are thieves...failed / incompetent thieves at that. They got caught, had to return much of what they stole, and had to pay for the rest.
Most of the stuff were gifts
 
Yeah, which is why they had to return most of it and pay around $80,000...
 
viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing


Politifact took on the claim that the Clinton's stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House when they left office.

They succeed is arguing that the $200k figure was too high, but they fail to make the case that the Clintons did NOT attempt to make off with a 'treasure' of items that did not beling to them. As in almost every Clinton scandal, their defense comes down to how 'it was all an honest mistake'.

Politifact attempts to argue that, IN THE END, it was NOT 'stealing' becauae after they got busted they returned a lot of it and was forced to pay for much of what they took.

Evidently, according to liberals, it's only stealing if you take it and get away with it. If you get caught and have to return it and/or pay for it then it's NOT stealing.

POLITIFACT:
"The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high."

Politifact's final decision is that the Clintons did not steal from the WH, NOT based on the fact that they didn't do it - which they did - but based on the disputed AMOUNT of how much they stole.

:p

Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House

Now liberals want these criminal, pilfering Arkansas hillbillies back in the WH so they can fleece America some more
That's a complete bullshit lie and you know it.
Presidents get two types of gifts. Gifts from friends and gifts to the country. They are registered at the White House and kept track of. When they left, they left with their own personal property. When Republicans lied and made a stink, which, of course, is typical for the GOP, they just gave everything back, their own personal stuff because they knew Republicans would never let it go. And now some right wing turds are once again, lying. Just like always. Right wingers can never tell the truth. About anything. It's in their nature to lie. It's who they are. What they believe.
 
viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing


Politifact took on the claim that the Clinton's stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House when they left office.

They succeed is arguing that the $200k figure was too high, but they fail to make the case that the Clintons did NOT attempt to make off with a 'treasure' of items that did not beling to them. As in almost every Clinton scandal, their defense comes down to how 'it was all an honest mistake'.

Politifact attempts to argue that, IN THE END, it was NOT 'stealing' becauae after they got busted they returned a lot of it and was forced to pay for much of what they took.

Evidently, according to liberals, it's only stealing if you take it and get away with it. If you get caught and have to return it and/or pay for it then it's NOT stealing.

POLITIFACT:
"The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high."

Politifact's final decision is that the Clintons did not steal from the WH, NOT based on the fact that they didn't do it - which they did - but based on the disputed AMOUNT of how much they stole.

:p

Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House

Now liberals want these criminal, pilfering Arkansas hillbillies back in the WH so they can fleece America some more
What’s funny is that conservatives think anyone believes their ridiculous lies.
 
Yeah, that's why the Clintons had to return much of what they took and pay for the rest...
 
viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing


Politifact took on the claim that the Clinton's stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House when they left office.

They succeed is arguing that the $200k figure was too high, but they fail to make the case that the Clintons did NOT attempt to make off with a 'treasure' of items that did not beling to them. As in almost every Clinton scandal, their defense comes down to how 'it was all an honest mistake'.

Politifact attempts to argue that, IN THE END, it was NOT 'stealing' becauae after they got busted they returned a lot of it and was forced to pay for much of what they took.

Evidently, according to liberals, it's only stealing if you take it and get away with it. If you get caught and have to return it and/or pay for it then it's NOT stealing.

POLITIFACT:
"The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high."

Politifact's final decision is that the Clintons did not steal from the WH, NOT based on the fact that they didn't do it - which they did - but based on the disputed AMOUNT of how much they stole.

:p

Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House

Now liberals want these criminal, pilfering Arkansas hillbillies back in the WH so they can fleece America some more


This sentence from your post is not contained within your link. It is a lie added by you.

Politifact's final decision is that the Clintons did not steal from the WH, NOT based on the fact that they didn't do it - which they did - but based on the disputed AMOUNT of how much they stole.

Why do right wingers lie about everything?
Clearly this is rhetorical.
 
The Clintons get busted, gave to return much of what they stile and oay for much of the rest - documented - and liberals shove their heads up their ass in order to ignore historical fact, then try to blame someone else because it's dark... ROFLOL.

I can understand why you are embarassed - the Clintons are lousy thieves and liars who got caught....
 

Forum List

Back
Top