Kevin_Kennedy
Defend Liberty
- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,602
- 1,968
- 245
- Thread starter
- #21
By offering them up to $4500.00 for their old one? Let's be honest, if we are TRULY concerned about the "middle income families who can't afford a new car", what's the chance of them getting $4500.00 for it as a traditional trade-in?
Alright, looking at Ford's website it appears that their cheapest car is the Ford Focus-Sedan.
Ford Vehicle Showroom
Let's do the math.
A family turns in their clunker for $4500 but they must buy a new car and they settle for the Ford Focus-Sedan. Now Ford's website prices the Focus at $15,995, so they put their $4500 towards the new Focus of course. They now owe $11,495 for the Ford Focus-Sedan. For a low or middle-income family, taking on over $11,000 in debt is not a good financial decision. A used car is a much better decision, financially, but now the price of those used cars are being driven up by government intervention in the market. So I ask again, how does paying more for a used car, or buying a new car they can't afford, help these people?
Do you know how many used cars are sold a year and what percentage the 750k or let's say 400k in resalable condition would have been to the total used cars sold a year?
I am trying to figure out what percentage these clunkers are to the total used car business?
Anyway, on your scenario above...NO ONE IS FORCING the individual to take the cash for clunkers program are they? don't individuals have free choice in this country?
What the poor family could do is SELL THEIR CLUNKER on the free market, and then buy another used car with it....
IF WHAT YOU SAY is correct and used car prices will rise because of the shortage, then this "poor person" can sell his own car and GET MORE FOR IT, before he buys the newer used car.... He will get more for his old one, and pay more for the newer used car he buys...but it would be a wash.
Care
You have to buy a new car to qualify for Cash for Clunkers.