Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean once again, Wall Street and Corporate America are trying to shove another corporate republican down the throats of the GOP that they don't want.
And when Hillary beats him in 2016, these same conservatives will shrug and say "Well, he wasn't a real conservative, anyway!"
The GOP "don't want?"
I'll tell you who the GOP don't want - Mike Huckabee.
He's polling at 0%, well behind Christie.
Polls aren't asking about him.
Should be interesting when they start including him in the mix.
But one more time, I know this keeps you up at night, but I think the GOP rank and file is kind of tired of nominating Wall Street types.
No. No it's not. It's a poll of those who are believed to be interested in the Presidency and perceived to have a legitimate shot.its pushing two establishment hacks as being "leading candidates", so in a way it is a push poll
Who do you expect them to ask about? Phil Robertson and Rosie O'Donnell? Random people pulled out of the phone book?
"perceived to have a legitimate shot"....says who? perceived by who? how can they know about others if they dont poll on them?
Why not ask about Paul vs Warren, Walker vs Jerry Brown
even Phil Robertson vs Rosie O'donnel would be a more interesting poll, and coulndt be shopped around by establishment hacks to manipulate opinion,....as much.
At this pre-midterm election stage the only meaningful piece of data that can be derived from that data is that Christie is a viable candidate against HRC. It means absolutely squat if neither of them end up on their respective tickets. It is just as meaningless if only one of them ends up with the nomination.
There is so much water that still has to flow under the political bridge in the next 2 and a half years that I would not give it another thought.
I completely agree with you. But I will be honest...with Hillary's name recognition and all the talk about her inevitable coronation....the fact anyone is beating her in the polls this early is surprising.
I see the polls not as anything substantive but more as an expression of approval or disapproval for generic Dems and Republicans. The Dems need to be very worried.
What this country needs is a kick-butt conservative who can deal with adversity and beat the pie out of it. Republicans Ted Cruz and Scott Walker come to my mind.
CNN is headquarters for the Old Liar's Club where conservatism is concerned. Christie bails when he softpedals known commies and louts. He is insider illuminati pushing for UN control, and the plan is to put a Barack Obama to be World Emperor when that occurs with a huge pox on America, just like in colonial times. So Christie will have to do a lot of apple-polishing and promise-keeping on conservative, Constitutional issues before he earns my vote. I don't dislike him personally, it's just that he cooperates with others first, party last. In spite of the garbage CNN dumps on the public, the Republican Party is quite conservative, with individual faults fishbowled and gargantuan acts of kindness to the taxpayer shoved under the carpet if not under the bus. I'm wise to the wise guys of Commie News Network.What this country needs is a kick-butt conservative who can deal with adversity and beat the pie out of it. Republicans Ted Cruz and Scott Walker come to my mind.
i would agree with you on that
but you will notice that the cnn
has placed those two in the -20 range on the poll charts
--LOL
It would be a push poll if other primary Republican candidates were actually ahead of Christie.Polls are generally not designed to influence public opinion. And they certainly aren't when they ask which candidate beats which candidate. It's pretty silly to imply otherwise.
Genuine polls are not but "Push Polls" are most definitely designed to do so by asking deliberately misleading questions usually prefaced by disinformation about the candidate and/or issues.
"Who would you support for President, Chris Christie or Hillary Clinton?" is not a push poll.
It's retarded to even think it might be.
Sorry, my primary vote goes to the candidate who convinces me he will not only end willy-nilly spending but will fight for an amendment to prevent politicians from running up the national debt to the point of no return.CNN is headquarters for the Old Liar's Club where conservatism is concerned. Christie bails when he softpedals known commies and louts. He is insider illuminati pushing for UN control, and the plan is to put a Barack Obama to be World Emperor when that occurs with a huge pox on America, just like in colonial times. So Christie will have to do a lot of apple-polishing and promise-keeping on conservative, Constitutional issues before he earns my vote. I don't dislike him personally, it's just that he cooperates with others first, party last. In spite of the garbage CNN dumps on the public, the Republican Party is quite conservative, with individual faults fishbowled and gargantuan acts of kindness to the taxpayer shoved under the carpet if not under the bus. I'm wise to the wise guys of Commie News Network.i would agree with you on that
but you will notice that the cnn
has placed those two in the -20 range on the poll charts
--LOL
I can see why that would bother a person married to the GOP, but to more people NOT putting his "party first" is a huge asset. I think most people in the US are sick of "party first" politicians, that is sure what polls suggest. The "party first" crowd are the reason nothing gets done in Washington. And history shows that 2013 was the worse ever.
It would be a push poll if other primary Republican candidates were actually ahead of Christie.Genuine polls are not but "Push Polls" are most definitely designed to do so by asking deliberately misleading questions usually prefaced by disinformation about the candidate and/or issues.
"Who would you support for President, Chris Christie or Hillary Clinton?" is not a push poll.
It's retarded to even think it might be.
I completely agree with you. But I will be honest...with Hillary's name recognition and all the talk about her inevitable coronation....the fact anyone is beating her in the polls this early is surprising.
I see the polls not as anything substantive but more as an expression of approval or disapproval for generic Dems and Republicans. The Dems need to be very worried.
no...this is a meaningless poll, for attention and nothing more.
It would be a push poll if other primary Republican candidates were actually ahead of Christie."Who would you support for President, Chris Christie or Hillary Clinton?" is not a push poll.
It's retarded to even think it might be.
No it would not.
Asking which candidates can beat which candidates is not a push poll.
Republicans have been so spectacularly wrong about polling over the past 5 years, it's stunning.
I see the polls not as anything substantive but more as an expression of approval or disapproval for generic Dems and Republicans. The Dems need to be very worried.
no...this is a meaningless poll, for attention and nothing more.
It is pretty much meaningless. We're three years away from the election. Anything can happen.
[
I know how much you want Wall Street types to suffer, but here's the thing - I really don't give a shit who's President. I made more money in 2013 under a Democrat President than I ever have before.
But keep dreaming about Huckabee!
lol
Make sure to think up some clever conspiracy theory when he either doesn't run or doesn't register above 5% in the polls.
Isn't this interesting. Hillary was supposed to be the invincible monster, but according to CNN polling she would lose to Chris Christie by two points were the election to be held today. Christie beats Clinton in the poll 48% to 46%.
The other two recent polls also show Christie leading. The Democrat Pollster PPP has Christie up 45% to 42%. Quinnipiac has Christie up 42% to 41%.
So to my liberal friends....what gives? I thought Hillary was unbeatable? Shouldn't she be up like 10%-15%. How is this possible? What about all of those threads about how crappy the Repubs are....why isn't Hillary killing any challenger?
Here's the link. Let the deflection begin.
2016 CNN Poll: Clinton deadlocked with Christie but leads other GOP presidential possibilities ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
I see the polls not as anything substantive but more as an expression of approval or disapproval for generic Dems and Republicans. The Dems need to be very worried.
no...this is a meaningless poll, for attention and nothing more.
It is pretty much meaningless. We're three years away from the election. Anything can happen.
Sorry, my primary vote goes to the candidate who convinces me he will not only end willy-nilly spending but will fight for an amendment to prevent politicians from running up the national debt to the point of no return.CNN is headquarters for the Old Liar's Club where conservatism is concerned. Christie bails when he softpedals known commies and louts. He is insider illuminati pushing for UN control, and the plan is to put a Barack Obama to be World Emperor when that occurs with a huge pox on America, just like in colonial times. So Christie will have to do a lot of apple-polishing and promise-keeping on conservative, Constitutional issues before he earns my vote. I don't dislike him personally, it's just that he cooperates with others first, party last. In spite of the garbage CNN dumps on the public, the Republican Party is quite conservative, with individual faults fishbowled and gargantuan acts of kindness to the taxpayer shoved under the carpet if not under the bus. I'm wise to the wise guys of Commie News Network.
I can see why that would bother a person married to the GOP, but to more people NOT putting his "party first" is a huge asset. I think most people in the US are sick of "party first" politicians, that is sure what polls suggest. The "party first" crowd are the reason nothing gets done in Washington. And history shows that 2013 was the worse ever.
And if one more conservative-when-convenient person is nominated, I am going to register as an independent for the duration of my life. Period.
It would be a push poll if other primary Republican candidates were actually ahead of Christie.
No it would not.
Asking which candidates can beat which candidates is not a push poll.
Republicans have been so spectacularly wrong about polling over the past 5 years, it's stunning.
i disagree given whats coming out of the GOP and just how stubborn they tend to be.
Sorry, my primary vote goes to the candidate who convinces me he will not only end willy-nilly spending but will fight for an amendment to prevent politicians from running up the national debt to the point of no return.CNN is headquarters for the Old Liar's Club where conservatism is concerned. Christie bails when he softpedals known commies and louts. He is insider illuminati pushing for UN control, and the plan is to put a Barack Obama to be World Emperor when that occurs with a huge pox on America, just like in colonial times. So Christie will have to do a lot of apple-polishing and promise-keeping on conservative, Constitutional issues before he earns my vote. I don't dislike him personally, it's just that he cooperates with others first, party last. In spite of the garbage CNN dumps on the public, the Republican Party is quite conservative, with individual faults fishbowled and gargantuan acts of kindness to the taxpayer shoved under the carpet if not under the bus. I'm wise to the wise guys of Commie News Network.
I can see why that would bother a person married to the GOP, but to more people NOT putting his "party first" is a huge asset. I think most people in the US are sick of "party first" politicians, that is sure what polls suggest. The "party first" crowd are the reason nothing gets done in Washington. And history shows that 2013 was the worse ever.
And if one more conservative-when-convenient person is nominated, I am going to register as an independent for the duration of my life. Period.
Interesting to you but no one else cares. Pollsters ask about the top 3 or 4 candidates in the polls, and that's it. They ask about Christie and Clinton because they are near the top of their party's respective polls."perceived to have a legitimate shot"....says who? perceived by who? how can they know about others if they dont poll on them?No. No it's not. It's a poll of those who are believed to be interested in the Presidency and perceived to have a legitimate shot.
Who do you expect them to ask about? Phil Robertson and Rosie O'Donnell? Random people pulled out of the phone book?
Why not ask about Paul vs Warren, Walker vs Jerry Brown
even Phil Robertson vs Rosie O'donnel would be a more interesting poll, and coulndt be shopped around by establishment hacks to manipulate opinion,....as much.
Imaginary conspiracy theories about the "elite" pushing candidates on you is just silly.
Interesting to you but no one else cares. Pollsters ask about the top 3 or 4 candidates in the polls, and that's it. They ask about Christie and Clinton because they are near the top of their party's respective polls."perceived to have a legitimate shot"....says who? perceived by who? how can they know about others if they dont poll on them?
Why not ask about Paul vs Warren, Walker vs Jerry Brown
even Phil Robertson vs Rosie O'donnel would be a more interesting poll, and coulndt be shopped around by establishment hacks to manipulate opinion,....as much.
Imaginary conspiracy theories about the "elite" pushing candidates on you is just silly.
I bet you a Phil Robertson vs Rosie O'Donnel poll would bring more people, more eyes, more clicks to websites etc than a Clinton/Christy poll.
the poll in OP apparently just questioned on those two candidates not "top 3 or 4"
You dont think the "elite", the movers and shakers, so-to-speak have their pet candidates? Or the special interests? You dont think they use influence to push candidates on the general public?
You are truely naive.
Everybody should LIE to the pollsters, if they give you 2 choices insist on another, name some obscure local pol etc. Polling and pollsters are part of the problem with politics in this country.
