CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

[jc456]

That you would understand.

empirical evidence please.

 

[jc456]

Carbon Isotope ratios prove the increase in CO2 conc is from burning fossil fuels. It has also been known for over 100 years that CO2 is a GHG. You denying simple scientific evidence is not proof.

can you name all the GHG's?

 

[jc456]

Which part tells you that it's not a scientific fact a 33 % increase in CO2 conc in just 50 years is not causing CC. I'd really like to see your evidence that CC is not occurring an CO2 is not a GHG.

why don't you post the evidence it is from fossil fuels?

 

[Dekster]

O3 is a completely different issue and it's deletion would have caused countless deaths from skin cancer.

It also traps heat and who care if frail whitey dies off first.

 

[Shareprofit]

where?

Do you realise there are other countries on Earth besides America?

 

[jc456]

Do you realise there are other countries on Earth besides America?

so no people died anywhere?

 

[Shareprofit]

why don't you post the evidence it is from fossil fuels?

Do a 5 second Google search yourself.

Tracking fossil fuel emissions with carbon-14 - NOAA Research

Researchers from NOAA and the University of Colorado Boulder have devised a breakthrough method for estimating national emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels using ambient air samples and a well-known isotope of carbon that scientists have relied on for decades to date archaeological sites.

research.noaa.gov

 

[Shareprofit]

so no people died anywhere?

In America.

 

[jc456]

Do a 5 second Google search yourself.

Tracking fossil fuel emissions with carbon-14 - NOAA Research

Researchers from NOAA and the University of Colorado Boulder have devised a breakthrough method for estimating national emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels using ambient air samples and a well-known isotope of carbon that scientists have relied on for decades to date archaeological sites.

research.noaa.gov

from your link.

estimating national emissions

Estimates are not empirical

 

[jc456]

In America.

where? Funny, why did you say there were other countries then? Post a news article where a human died of CO2?

BTW, are you saying if you wear a mask you will die from your CO2? Why didn't people die of CO2 during the mask mandates? or are you suggesting they did?

 

[Shareprofit]

can you name all the GHG's?

I bet you can't but hope this helps. CH4, N2O, H20, CO2 and a number of lesser gasses.

 

[Sunsettommy]

In America.

You dodged this because you can't address the actual data and the death rate had plummeted over 90% in 100 years which is a fact you can't deny.

EMDAT website

 

[Shareprofit]

from your link.

estimating national emissions

Estimates are not empirical

OK, live your denial. American right wing

 

[Sunsettommy]

I bet you can't but hope this helps. CH4, N2O, H20, CO2 and a number of lesser gasses.

Which one is the dominant GHG?

 

[jc456]

I bet you can't but hope this helps. CH4, N2O, H20, CO2 and a number of lesser gasses.

nice, now post the percentage of each in the air

 

[Shareprofit]

You dodged this because you can't address the actual data and the death rate had plummeted over 90% in 100 years which is a fact you can't deny.

EMDAT website

The technology is different now to what it was then, so yes more people are dying from CC than a few years ago. Not sure if you realise there is more World than just America.

 

[jc456]

OK, live your denial. American right wing

so you have no empirical evidence?

 

[Shareprofit]

Which one is the dominant GHG?

H2O

 

[jc456]

The technology is different now to what it was then, so yes more people are dying from CC than a few years ago. Not sure if you realise there is more World than just America.

they are? where's climate changed?

 

[Shareprofit]

so you have no empirical evidence?

Show me evidence the extra CO2 is not causing global warming. It should be easy for you.