CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

[Sunsettommy]

Quoting WUW yeah some reality their way "Watts's blog has been criticized for inaccuracy. The Guardian columnist George Monbiot described WUWT as "highly partisan and untrustworthy".[28] Leo Hickman, at The Guardian's Environment Blog, also criticized Watts's blog, stating that Watts "risks polluting his legitimate scepticism about the scientific processes and methodologies underpinning climate science with his accompanying politicised commentary."[29]" wiki

Ha ha ha.....,

It is clear you have no counterpoint to offer the sources for the charts are NASA, EMDAT, NOAA BOM, and many many more which is why you resort to deflection in your desperate attempt to avoid first line data and facts.

My post stands unchallenged therefore still correct.

Who is paying you to be this stupid and ignorant?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Quoting WUW yeah some reality their way "Watts's blog has been criticized for inaccuracy. The Guardian columnist George Monbiot described WUWT as "highly partisan and untrustworthy".[28] Leo Hickman, at The Guardian's Environment Blog, also criticized Watts's blog, stating that Watts "risks polluting his legitimate scepticism about the scientific processes and methodologies underpinning climate science with his accompanying politicised commentary."[29]" wiki

Thats rich... Moonbat is a partisan AGW monger. he wouldn't know a fact if it hit him up side the damn head.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Thats rich... Moonbat is a partisan AGW monger. he wouldn't know a fact if it hit him up side the damn head.

Even funnier is that Watts uses Solar and drives a Hybrid car.

He ducks because he can't address the evidence at all which is what ALL warmist/alarmists does these days.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Quoting WUW yeah some reality their way "Watts's blog has been criticized for inaccuracy. The Guardian columnist George Monbiot described WUWT as "highly partisan and untrustworthy".[28] Leo Hickman, at The Guardian's Environment Blog, also criticized Watts's blog, stating that Watts "risks polluting his legitimate scepticism about the scientific processes and methodologies underpinning climate science with his accompanying politicised commentary."[29]" wiki

Address this:

This from the EMDAT website still going to duck it?

 

[Shareprofit]

Ha ha ha.....,

It is clear you have no counterpoint to offer the sources for the charts are NASA, EMDAT, NOAA BOM, and many many more which is why you resort to deflection in your desperate attempt to avoid first line data and facts.

My post stands unchallenged therefore still correct.

Who is paying you to be this stupid and ignorant?

"According to the total annual ACE Index, cyclone intensity has risen noticeably over the past 20 years, and eight of the 10 most active years since 1950 have occurred since the mid-1990s (see Figure 2)." Climate Change Indicators: Tropical Cyclone Activity | US EPA.

 

[Billy_Bob]

"According to the total annual ACE Index, cyclone intensity has risen noticeably over the past 20 years, and eight of the 10 most active years since 1950 have occurred since the mid-1990s (see Figure 2)." Climate Change Indicators: Tropical Cyclone Activity | US EPA.

A short snippet in time that ignores past ups and downs of that metric...

Again, when we look at it in a longer span, your full of it and so are they.

 

[Sunsettommy]

"According to the total annual ACE Index, cyclone intensity has risen noticeably over the past 20 years, and eight of the 10 most active years since 1950 have occurred since the mid-1990s (see Figure 2)." Climate Change Indicators: Tropical Cyclone Activity | US EPA.

Just the NORTH ATLANTIC basin only while ACE data I posted nearly covers the planet.

Figure 1. Number of Hurricanes in the North Atlantic, 1878–2020

This graph shows the number of hurricanes that formed in the North Atlantic Ocean each year from 1878 to 2020, along with the number that made landfall in the United States. The orange curve shows how the total count in the green curve can be adjusted to attempt to account for the lack of aircraft and satellite observations in early years. All three curves have been smoothed using a five-year average, plotted at the middle year. The most recent average (2016–2020) is plotted at 2018.

===

There is no clear trend in the chart.

You haven't countered anything.

 

[Shareprofit]

A short snippet in time that ignores past ups and downs of that metric...

Again, when we look at it in a longer span, your full of it and so are they.

Increasing trend with the huge increase in CO2 conc over the last 50 years.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Increasing trend with the huge increase in CO2 conc over the last 50 years.

NO... on both counts...

ACE shows no significant increase long term. CO2 impact cannot be discerned from noise in our climatic system. Epic failure on both counts.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Increasing trend with the huge increase in CO2 conc over the last 50 years.

No increasing trend at all after 1993 are you that blind?

Then we have this:

2022 Global Wide Hurricane Season Ends with Weakest Storm Levels of the Last 42 Years

LINK

 

[Shareprofit]

No increasing trend at all after 1993 are you that blind?

Then we have this:

2022 Global Wide Hurricane Season Ends with Weakest Storm Levels of the Last 42 Years

LINK

I suppose Scientific American is just another msm to you deniers.

"Even Weak Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger as the Climate Warms​

Data collected by thousands of scientific instruments scattered across the world’s oceans show that weak tropical cyclones are intensifying, not just stronger ones"

Even Weak Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger as the Climate Warms

Data collected by thousands of scientific instruments scattered across the world’s oceans show that weak tropical cyclones are intensifying, not just stronger ones

www.scientificamerican.com

 

[Shareprofit]

NO... on both counts...

ACE shows no significant increase long term. CO2 impact cannot be discerned from noise in our climatic system. Epic failure on both counts.

"One of the World’s Coldest Places Is Now the Warmest it’s Been in 1,000 Years, Scientists Say"​

One of the World’s Coldest Places Is Now the Warmest it’s Been in 1,000 Years, Scientists Say - Inside Climate News

Global warming is spiking in one of the world’s coldest places, atop the 2-mile thick ice sheet in central Greenland, where new research shows that the first decade of the 2000s was clearly the warmest 10 years on record in at least 1,000 years. The findings, published today in Nature, are based...

insideclimatenews.org

 

[Sunsettommy]

I suppose Scientific American is just another msm to you deniers.

"Even Weak Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger as the Climate Warms​

Data collected by thousands of scientific instruments scattered across the world’s oceans show that weak tropical cyclones are intensifying, not just stronger ones"

Even Weak Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger as the Climate Warms

Data collected by thousands of scientific instruments scattered across the world’s oceans show that weak tropical cyclones are intensifying, not just stronger ones

www.scientificamerican.com

You still didn't counter the official data which show no increase in tropical storm energy and hurricane frequency that has been posted many times.

Here again this time from the Colorado State University using the data from the National Hurricane center a part of NOAA

Northern Hemisphere Historical Tropical Cyclone Statistics​

All columns are sortable.​

Year	Named Storms	Named Storm Days	Hurricanes	Hurricane Days	Major Hurricanes	Major Hurricane Days	Accumulated Cyclone Energy
1971	65	316.25	42	153.5	18	33	616.1
1972	54	336	37	150.25	18	31	607.8
1973	45	199	23	72.25	8	15.5	324
1974	61	249	31	87.25	8	11	368.8
1975	51	230.5	32	90.25	12	18.75	387.7
1976	55	277.75	29	115.25	16	36.5	514.6
1977	38	146.5	22	53.25	7	16.25	248.7
1978	63	310.75	36	116.75	12	28.75	526.3
1979	47	222.5	27	98.5	14	29	443.9
1980	52	245	31	112	14	26.75	466.7
1981	58	266.25	33	93.75	10	15.75	416.4
1982	59	317.25	35	134.75	19	33.25	569.5
1983	51	227.75	27	93.5	15	37	447.5
1984	66	317.75	36	130.5	17	36.25	572.7
1985	66	308.75	37	129.75	17	18	523.1
1986	52	262.5	32	123.5	11	22.75	480.6
1987	58	284.75	30	118.5	17	39.5	539.4
1988	56	236.75	26	110.25	14	33	462.4
1989	61	299.75	37	133.25	15	37.25	577.1
1990	67	377.75	46	180	16	49.5	742.4
1991	55	305.25	35	143	19	54.75	650.6
1992	75	427.5	44	190.25	23	65.25	880.3
1993	54	277.25	37	121.75	19	34	516.1
1994	66	354.25	34	137.5	18	53.25	687.2
1995	59	308	35	138.25	16	41.5	596.7
1996	63	336.25	39	156.75	19	49	670.3
1997	61	332.75	37	162	21	72.75	807.9
1998	53	249.25	33	125.25	15	30.25	497.6
1999	49	207.75	28	100.75	14	31.75	421
2000	63	275.75	30	110.25	12	26.25	477.5
2001	63	279.75	39	127.5	19	30.5	523.4
2002	56	278.25	28	123	19	51	589
2003	58	283.5	32	121.5	14	47.5	583.8
2004	63	335.5	37	163.75	23	76.5	792
2005	73	341.25	40	139.5	19	53.75	670
2006	56	268	30	127.75	19	45	572.2
2007	54	191	29	82	14	31.25	392.1
2008	66	261.5	28	90.75	16	23	427.7
2009	57	232	27	88.5	14	37	464.9
2010	46	206.25	27	81	13	25.5	370.8
2011	54	253.25	28	94.25	17	31.25	448.2
2012	65	317	35	111.5	17	29.75	537.5
2013	67	253.25	31	84.5	13	24	433.3
2014	55	284.25	36	122.75	20	43.25	576.8
2015	68	390	42	186.5	31	74	853.3
2016	67	319.25	38	119.5	21	43	602.5
2017	65	279	34	114.75	16	29.5	513.9
2018	76	394.75	41	171.75	23	70.75	848.8
2019	74	307.75	37	116.25	23	47	599.7
2020	75	273.25	34	85.75	19	26.75	441.4
2021	68	257.25	28	91.75	12	38.5	469.7
2022	60	227.75	31	83.75	11	22.25	385.3

Statistics calculated from National Hurricane Center, the Central Pacific Hurricane Center and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center best tracks as archived in the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship.​

Available online here:​

 

[Billy_Bob]

I suppose Scientific American is just another msm to you deniers.

"Even Weak Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger as the Climate Warms​

Data collected by thousands of scientific instruments scattered across the world’s oceans show that weak tropical cyclones are intensifying, not just stronger ones"

Even Weak Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger as the Climate Warms

Data collected by thousands of scientific instruments scattered across the world’s oceans show that weak tropical cyclones are intensifying, not just stronger ones

www.scientificamerican.com

Did you even read the paper on which this is based? I am guessing you didnt..

Theory1 and numerical modelling2 suggest that tropical cyclones (TCs) will strengthen with rising ocean temperatures. Even though models have reached broad agreement on projected TC intensification3–5, observed trends in TC intensity remain inconclusive and under active debate6–10 in all ocean basins except the North Atlantic, where aircraft reconnaissance data greatly reduce uncertainties11. The conventional satellite-based estimates are not accurate enough to ascertain the trend in TC intensity6,11, suffering from contamination by heavy rain, clouds, breaking waves and spray12. Here we show that weak TCs (that is, tropical storms to category-1 TCs based on the Saffir–Simpson scale) have intensified in all ocean basins during the period 1991–2020, based on huge amounts of highly accurate ocean current data derived from surface drifters. These drifters have submerged ‘holy sock’ drogues at 15 m depth to reduce biases induced by processes at the air–sea interface and thereby accurately measure near-surface currents, even under the most destructive TCs. The ocean current speeds show a robust upward trend of ~4.0 cm s−1 per decade globally, corresponding to a positive trend of 1.8 m s−1 per decade in the TC intensity. Our analysis further indicates that globally TCs have strengthened across the entirety of the intensity distribution. These results serve as a historical baseline that is crucial for assessing model physics, simulations and projections given the failure of state-of-the-art climate models in fully replicating these trends13

The first line in the abstract tells you this is all modeling hope and poke. "suggests" is not empirical verification just as a model is not.

source;

This is why people like you are duped so easily. You NEVER check the facts.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Did you even read the paper on which this is based? I am guessing you didnt..



The first line in the abstract tells you this is all modeling hope and poke. "suggests" is not empirical verification just as a model is not.

source;

This is why people like you are duped so easily. You NEVER check the facts.

The fool keeps ignoring the data from the official NOAA over and over again.

The latest ACE number is lowest in many decades and the idiot completely ignores it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The fool keeps ignoring the data from the official NOAA over and over again.

The latest ACE number is lowest in many decades and the idiot completely ignores it.

These people rely Soley on modeling, even though it is wrong 100% of the time. I wonder what they are going to do these next few years as the global cooling becomes more pronounced, in defiance of their models.

 

[Leo123]

Quoting WUW yeah some reality their way "Watts's blog has been criticized for inaccuracy. The Guardian columnist George Monbiot described WUWT as "highly partisan and untrustworthy".[28] Leo Hickman, at The Guardian's Environment Blog, also criticized Watts's blog, stating that Watts "risks polluting his legitimate scepticism about the scientific processes and methodologies underpinning climate science with his accompanying politicised commentary."[29]" wiki

There are bo ‘scientific processes’ underpinning human caused CC.

 

[Shareprofit]

There are bo ‘scientific processes’ underpinning human caused CC.

That you would understand.

 

[Leo123]

That you would understand.

You have not shown any.

 

[jc456]

CC is killing people right now.

where?