Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hes a leading scientist ? Too bad neither the university heās affiliated with nor the other 20k universities and colleges agree with him. Heās outnumbered 100 to one. Hilarious. You dufus butt boys quote the occasional in bred then dismiss all the others from the university he has degrees from.The rats are starting to abandon ship:
CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate ScientistForget āsettledā science or āconsensusā ā that is a political construct designed to quash debate in the interests of promoting a command-and-control Net Zero agenda. One of the great drivers of continual changes in the climate is heat exchange within both the atmosphere and the Earthās surface. Current understanding of the entire picture is limited, and it seems the opportunity has been taken to fill this gap by blaming carbon dioxide almost entirely for the recent gentle warming. A new paper on the so-called āgreenhouseā effect highlights the vital role played by oceans and water vapour flows. CO2 is said to have āminimal effectā on the Earthās temperature and climate.The paper has been published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and is written by meteorologist William Kininmonth, a former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisationās Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Governmentās National Climate Centre. Kininmonth argues that the oceans are the āvital inertial and thermal flywheelsā of the climate system. If one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans, he argues. āEfforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain,ā he adds.In Kininmonthās view, the recent warming is āprobably simply the result of fluctuations in the ever-changing ocean circulationā. CO2 āmust be recognisedā as a very minor contributor to the observed warming, and one that is unlikely to prolong the warming trend beyond the peak generated by the natural oceanic oscillations, he notes. He explains that the main driver of global temperature is the movement of energy in water, both in the oceans and the atmosphere after evaporation.As COā concentration increases from 0 to 600 parts per million (green bars), the total strength of the greenhouse effect, measured as the energy the greenhouse gases radiate to the Earthās surface, barely changes (orange line). Source: Kininmonth 2022
An increase of 30 % in just 50 years has not happened before ever because man has been burning fossil fuels. Fact, not modeling. BTW this from the WPo.First of all, it is not a "phenomenal amount."
Stomata proxies show that these wild swings are not uncommon in the paleo record.
View attachment 749984
Your dire emergency just got smashed into a billion pieces because the current rise is not uncommon or out of the ordinary for our planet's natural variational cycles.
This one fact alone makes any pontifications about CO2 driving anything ludicrous. This is evidence that these wide swings are not uncommon in the climatic records.
That is how fast your AGW lie is destroyed. FACTS... Observed and documents facts. Not conjecture and unsupported modeling crap.
Hes a leading scientist ? Too bad neither the university heās affiliated with nor the other 20k universities and colleges agree with him. Heās outnumbered 100 to one. Hilarious. You dufus butt boys quote the occasional in bred then dismiss all the others from the university he has degrees from.
You bozos are science illiterate.
An increase of 30 % in just 50 years has not happened before ever because man has been burning fossil fuels. Fact, not modeling. BTW this from the WPo.
Exactly as expected, I bet you're a Trump cult follower.
The stomata proxies prove that not to be true. Sorry Charlie, that one has been disproven. The folks over at the Washington Compost are flinging crap again.
You don't know that.An increase of 30 % in just 50 years has not happened before ever because man has been burning fossil fuels. Fact, not modeling. BTW this from the WPo.
This thread is not about your 'orange man bad' little one.Exactly as expected, I bet you're a Trump cult follower.
Neither do you but we do know it wasn't caused by man burning fossil fuels.You don't know that.
An increase of 30 % in just 50 years has not happened before ever because man has been burning fossil fuels. Fact, not modeling. BTW this from the WPo.
So what? The 39% increase has had no deleterious effects anyway no matter what the source and, you can't prove it hasn't happened 'ever before.'Neither do you but we do know it wasn't caused by man burning fossil fuels.
Weird!What was the increase after the asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs?
It has, global temperatures have reached records for several years, sea temperature is rising, sea level rising and increased intensity and frequency of weather extremes. Read MSM in the news every other day.So what? The 39% increase has had no deleterious effects anyway no matter what the source and, you can't prove it hasn't happened 'ever before.'
There are other scientists saying none of that is extreme. Fluctuating weather extremes are the norm and you haven't even defined 'extreme'.....how convenient to your argument. You can't prove it's because of CO2 there are at least thousands of climate drivers. Also, my comment referred to your baseless assumption that that particular CO2 rise has never happened before in Earth's history. (that last part you conveniently left out).As I first said, it's all speculation and again, NO deleterious effects can be proven to be happening on a global basis from that particular driver (CO2).It has, global temperatures have reached records for several years, sea temperature is rising, sea level rising and increased intensity and frequency of weather extremes. Read MSM in the news every other day.
I don't need a scientist to tell me what I need can see for my self, but the overwhelming majority of scientists all agree the changing weather is caused by Global warming.There are other scientists saying none of that is extreme. Fluctuating weather extremes are the norm and you haven't even defined 'extreme'.....how convenient to your argument. You can't prove it's because of CO2 there are at least thousands of climate drivers. Also, my comment referred to your baseless assumption that that particular CO2 rise has never happened before in Earth's history. (that last part you conveniently left out).As I first said, it's all speculation and again, NO deleterious effects can be proven to be happening on a global basis from that particular driver (CO2).
Your 'need to see' is not relevant here. Weather changes for many reasons and the Globe is warmed by the Sun.I don't need a scientist to tell me what I need can see for my self, but the overwhelming majority of scientists all agree the changing weather is caused by Global warming.
The MSM is lying to you.It has, global temperatures have reached records for several years, sea temperature is rising, sea level rising and increased intensity and frequency of weather extremes. Read MSM in the news every other day.
Youāre amazingly ignorant. Have you been picked up by any space invaders recently ?
Poor lefty is spewing his appeals to authority BS again.
Speaking of illiteracy, did you read up on what the CAGW hypothesis actually is?
Weird!
Youāre amazingly ignorant. Have you been picked up by any space invaders recently ?
How about Hillary and the kiddy prostitution ring ?
Counterpoint to what. I've provided the evidence all you have is your belief in" nah it's not happening ". Show me proof climate change is not occurring right now, I'll wait.
