CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

[Billo_Really]

I’m pointing at your inability to participate

Just because I'm giving you answers you don't care for, does not mean I'm not participating.

 

[ding]

Yeah buddy!

You're like a fish struggling in a net.

 

[jc456]

Just because I'm giving you answers you don't care for, does not mean I'm not participating.

Only you think you’re actually answering!

 

[Billo_Really]

Your like a fish struggling in a net.

And you are like the kid who has to wear hockey equipment, but you are not on a team!

 

[Billo_Really]

Only you think you’re actually answering!

If you don't like my answers, ask better questions.

 

[jc456]

If you don't like my answers, ask better questions.

Aren’t any better than post the data. The fact you haven’t isn’t an answer. Ask anyone else in here

 

[Crick]

Aren’t any better than post the data. The fact you haven’t isn’t an answer. Ask anyone else in here

You are one fucking pwned troll.

 

[jc456]

You are one fucking pwned troll.

Any day cultman post empirical data from the 99%

 

[Crick]

Any day cultman post empirical data from the 99%

Okay

2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center

Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C

www.theclimateadaptationcenter.org

The Keeling Curve

The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.

keelingcurve.ucsd.edu

 

[jc456]

Okay

2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center

Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C

www.theclimateadaptationcenter.org

The Keeling Curve

The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.

keelingcurve.ucsd.edu

So where are the 99% that agree with those?

 

[Crick]

So where are the 99% that agree with those?

Everyone else but you I guess.

 

[ding]

And you are like the kid who has to wear hockey equipment, but you are not on a team!

Hockey is for fags.

 

[ding]

Okay

2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center

Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C

www.theclimateadaptationcenter.org

The Keeling Curve

The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.

keelingcurve.ucsd.edu

Correlation does not prove causation. The geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were not caused by CO2 or orbital forcing. If your claim were true the planet wouldn't be 2C cooler with 120 ppm more atmospheric CO2 than the previous interglacial period and the planet wouldn't have cooled with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm.

 

[ding]

I wonder if anyone has noticed and thought about the implications of the seasonal fluctuation of CO2 dwarfing the annual volume of CO2 emissions. Think about it.

 

[ding]

You are one fucking pwned troll.

pwned? How old are you?

 

[Crick]

pwned? How old are you?

69

 

[Billy_Bob]

Okay

2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center

Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C

www.theclimateadaptationcenter.org

The Keeling Curve

The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.

keelingcurve.ucsd.edu

Well then you need to tell me why CO2 has gone up and down in the holocoen to the points we are at today. You claim that this is unusual, but the paleo records proves that it is not. Can you fail any more epically?

Explain this away Crick... Just try...

 

[Crick]

Well then you need to tell me why CO2 has gone up and down in the holocoen to the points we are at today. You claim that this is unusual, but the paleo records proves that it is not. Can you fail any more epically?

View attachment 751042

Explain this away Crick... Just try...

What I "claimed" was that those were the empirical data for which jc456 asked.

As for CO2, your graph above is a cherry-picked whoopee graph. Note the span of both axes and then compare that to the data below.

Well then you need to tell me why CO2 has gone up and down in the holocoen to the points we are at today. You claim that this is unusual, but the paleo records proves that it is not. Can you fail any more epically?

View attachment 751042

Explain this away Crick... Just try...

---

---

Your high range data is the last fifth of the Holocene or so. And I just don't believe it. For starters, where's your link?

Next, why does it look so dramatically different than all these other plots, several of which purport to show the same data.

10,000 Years of Carbon Dioxide - Berkeley Earth

A graph reflecting atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the last 10,000 years.

berkeleyearth.org

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011GB004247

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Evolution-of-the-atmospheric-CO-2-during-the-last-2000-years-in-ppm-from-the-Law-Dome_fig2_281185559

CO2 vs Temperature: Last 2000 years

CO2 is trending: See the latest atmospheric concentrations data on Twitter

CO2 concentrations are trending up. We're tweeting our latest CO2 data from the Cape Grim Baseline monitoring station in Tasmania.

blog.csiro.au

35 Scientific Papers: Global Sea Levels Were 1 – 2 Meters Higher Than Now For Most Of The Last 7,000 Years

notrickszone.com

I'll leave the explaining this away - as to why your no-source-provided-data look so unlike these other plots of the same Law Dome CO2 data - to YOU.

 

[ding]

What I "claimed" was that those were the empirical data for which jc456 asked.

As for CO2, your graph above is a cherry-picked whoopee graph. Note the span of both axes and then compare that to the data below.

---

---

Your high range data is the last fifth of the Holocene or so. And I just don't believe it. For starters, where's your link?

Next, why does it look so dramatically different than all these other plots, several of which purport to show the same data.

10,000 Years of Carbon Dioxide - Berkeley Earth

A graph reflecting atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the last 10,000 years.

berkeleyearth.org

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011GB004247

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Evolution-of-the-atmospheric-CO-2-during-the-last-2000-years-in-ppm-from-the-Law-Dome_fig2_281185559

CO2 vs Temperature: Last 2000 years

CO2 is trending: See the latest atmospheric concentrations data on Twitter

CO2 concentrations are trending up. We're tweeting our latest CO2 data from the Cape Grim Baseline monitoring station in Tasmania.

blog.csiro.au

35 Scientific Papers: Global Sea Levels Were 1 – 2 Meters Higher Than Now For Most Of The Last 7,000 Years

notrickszone.com

I'll leave the explaining this away - as to why your no-source-provided-data look so unlike these other plots of the same Law Dome CO2 data - to YOU.

Thus proving that temperature does not correlate to CO2.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Crick posed this chart that destroys his own claims, but he suffers from ocular delusions in reading charts every day.

for 11,000 years CO2 stayed in a tight range of just 20 ppm between 260-280 ppm yet the temperature change was large around 2-3C range while CO2 just mostly sat there even when it was about 260 ppm for 6,000 years temperature changed greatly during that time up to 3C change.

and this one too showing little CO2 change for a neat 1,800 years,

Those are SOUTH Polar ice core readings now we can add the more accurate GISP2 ice core data of Greenland showing similar temperature swings while CO2 barely changed at all for 10,000 years:

LINK

Similar 2-3.5C temperature swings while CO2 barely change at all.

Then we have this series of GISP2 charts from 14 years ago that utterly destroys the stupid Hockey Stick mania from CO2 sniffing worshippers.

Historical video perspective: our current "unprecedented" global warming in the context of scale​

LINK

===

LOL, it is obvious that CO2 doesn't drive temperature swings, but Crick suffers from severe ocular delusions to accept the evidence while most of us are rational can see the obvious.

Warmist/alarmists do NOT know they have been refuted for years because they have been steeped in delusional climate crisis propaganda swallowing the deepest bullshit gladly.

While rational beings know there is NO climate crisis at all, and this article drives it home with abundant evidence there is nothing unusual going on.

Where is the Climate Emergency?

LINK

Warmist/alarmists over several forums I posted this flypaper gem in gained around 750 replies but NONE of them based on the CONTENT of the article because they are TERRIFIED of it thus never address any of it.



Wake up Crick you have been beaten yet again, why don't you go back to fishing or traveling where you can be happy again and free of delusions.