Confirmed: The "Whistle Blower," had no direct access to any of the information,assumed it was tru

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,236
52,459
The report from the Whistle Blower is out....and it turns out this asshat had no direct contact or access to any of the information he was blowing on.................

To repeat....so even the left wing morons here on U.S.messageboard can understand....

He had no direct contact, or access to the information he was reporting on, he had all of his information from "hearsay" by other officials......

And because of this...nothing he said was even remotely accurate or true...

Breaking: Whistleblower complaint released

wc-1.png


And as reported earlier, all of the complaint comes from second-hand knowledge of the call and the events that transpired afterward:

Had the complainant actually read the transcript or been in the room, he might have noticed that Zelensky brought up Giuliani and the Biden investigation first, although Trump was certainly happy to discuss it. The Crowdstrike reference is accurate, though, as is its likely value to Trump. However, Trump never mentions his own election bid in the transcript nor does he pressure Zelensky in any obvious way.


The egg on the faces of democrats is going to start to smell ...........
 
I have a feeling the Pencil Neck Schiff is behind this crap.. he is the person the so called whistleblower has overheard or what ever .. I just have that feeling
 
The report from the Whistle Blower is out....and it turns out this asshat had no direct contact or access to any of the information he was blowing on.................

To repeat....so even the left wing morons here on U.S.messageboard can understand....

He had no direct contact, or access to the information he was reporting on, he had all of his information from "hearsay" by other officials......

And because of this...nothing he said was even remotely accurate or true...

Breaking: Whistleblower complaint released

wc-1.png


And as reported earlier, all of the complaint comes from second-hand knowledge of the call and the events that transpired afterward:

Had the complainant actually read the transcript or been in the room, he might have noticed that Zelensky brought up Giuliani and the Biden investigation first, although Trump was certainly happy to discuss it. The Crowdstrike reference is accurate, though, as is its likely value to Trump. However, Trump never mentions his own election bid in the transcript nor does he pressure Zelensky in any obvious way.


The egg on the faces of democrats is going to start to smell ...........


There is another thing to. Having worked for the government I learned fast to be so careful who you pissed off. At any point the guy you gave shit to could be your boss. Remember, in government one fails up. Retribution sucks ass. I would hate to be a career government employee that had pissed off the president in 2021.
 
all look at all the commotion it caused. god our government sucks. attack attack find reasons later. maybe.
 
Just one more piece of hard evidence that the left has gone utterly insane and have no place holding any public office whatsoever.
 
I have a feeling the Pencil Neck Schiff is behind this crap.. he is the person the so called whistleblower has overheard or what ever .. I just have that feeling
Making up shit is what Schiff does... so Schiff creating this liar would not surprise me..
 
The report from the Whistle Blower is out....and it turns out this asshat had no direct contact or access to any of the information he was blowing on.................

To repeat....so even the left wing morons here on U.S.messageboard can understand....

He had no direct contact, or access to the information he was reporting on, he had all of his information from "hearsay" by other officials......

And because of this...nothing he said was even remotely accurate or true...

Breaking: Whistleblower complaint released

wc-1.png


And as reported earlier, all of the complaint comes from second-hand knowledge of the call and the events that transpired afterward:

Had the complainant actually read the transcript or been in the room, he might have noticed that Zelensky brought up Giuliani and the Biden investigation first, although Trump was certainly happy to discuss it. The Crowdstrike reference is accurate, though, as is its likely value to Trump. However, Trump never mentions his own election bid in the transcript nor does he pressure Zelensky in any obvious way.


The egg on the faces of democrats is going to start to smell ...........
The Whistleblower never claimed to listen to the call

But as he states in his report, he received information from multiple people who were there.

Trump confirmed what was reported
 
Too bad ol'Trumpybear arrogantly confirmed many of the details himself, though!

Def. did the Dems a "Favor"
 
The report from the Whistle Blower is out....and it turns out this asshat had no direct contact or access to any of the information he was blowing on.................

To repeat....so even the left wing morons here on U.S.messageboard can understand....

He had no direct contact, or access to the information he was reporting on, he had all of his information from "hearsay" by other officials......

And because of this...nothing he said was even remotely accurate or true...

Breaking: Whistleblower complaint released

wc-1.png


And as reported earlier, all of the complaint comes from second-hand knowledge of the call and the events that transpired afterward:

Had the complainant actually read the transcript or been in the room, he might have noticed that Zelensky brought up Giuliani and the Biden investigation first, although Trump was certainly happy to discuss it. The Crowdstrike reference is accurate, though, as is its likely value to Trump. However, Trump never mentions his own election bid in the transcript nor does he pressure Zelensky in any obvious way.


The egg on the faces of democrats is going to start to smell ...........
The Whistleblower never claimed to listen to the call

But as he states in his report, he received information from multiple people who were there.

Trump confirmed what was reported


No...Trump didn't confirm anything.......what the whistle blower said isn't in the call you moron...
 
He had no direct contact, or access to the information he was reporting on, he had all of his information from "hearsay" by other officials......

CNN reported it that way....I pointed out the relevant passage in the original story a number of times...Even going so far as putting it in 7-point bold red letters, complete with link to the story.

The moonbats won't allow the truth -as even reported by one of their leading propaganda mills- to permeate their thick skulls.
 
Trump Derangement Syndrome afflicted Moon Bats lying again?

Say it ain't so!

All these stupid Moon Bats must be suffering from malnutrition after being served only nothing burgers for the last two years.

Meanwhile the Moon Bats shot their front runner in the foot.

They are not very bright, are they?
 
Yet a Transcript is a written report of the call

So to do this transcript they have to listen to the original call which is preserved for prosperity

its pretty obvious that the call was between two people and whomever was listening in on it.

And Trump does not deny it
 
he received information from multiple people who were there.
Which means he is releasing classified information he obtained illegally... All bets are off.. This fucker needs to be prosecuted along with those who "told" him..
 
The report from the Whistle Blower is out....and it turns out this asshat had no direct contact or access to any of the information he was blowing on.................

To repeat....so even the left wing morons here on U.S.messageboard can understand....

He had no direct contact, or access to the information he was reporting on, he had all of his information from "hearsay" by other officials......

And because of this...nothing he said was even remotely accurate or true...

Breaking: Whistleblower complaint released

wc-1.png


And as reported earlier, all of the complaint comes from second-hand knowledge of the call and the events that transpired afterward:

Had the complainant actually read the transcript or been in the room, he might have noticed that Zelensky brought up Giuliani and the Biden investigation first, although Trump was certainly happy to discuss it. The Crowdstrike reference is accurate, though, as is its likely value to Trump. However, Trump never mentions his own election bid in the transcript nor does he pressure Zelensky in any obvious way.


The egg on the faces of democrats is going to start to smell ...........

Yup. That's what I've read. He never talked with anyone. All his info is hearsay, gossip.

Leave it to the idiot Dems and lefty loons to take what he says as gospel.

Hell nothing in the transcript backs up anything that "whistleblower" claims.

Leave it the idiot Dems and lefty loons to go after Trump on bogus claims. LOL
 
Yet a Transcript is a written report of the call

So to do this transcript they have to listen to the original call which is preserved for prosperity

its pretty obvious that the call was between two people and whomever was listening in on it.

And Trump does not deny it


There was a call.
They talked about The Ukraine having corrupt officials in 2016 (as did the US)
They talked about cooperating in getting to the bottom of it.

That is why the dems freaked out
They are the root cause of the corruption.
 
Yet a Transcript is a written report of the call

So to do this transcript they have to listen to the original call which is preserved for prosperity

its pretty obvious that the call was between two people and whomever was listening in on it.

And Trump does not deny it


There was a call.
They talked about The Ukraine having corrupt officials in 2016 (as did the US)
They talked about cooperating in getting to the bottom of it.

That is why the dems freaked out
They are the root cause of the corruption.


The dems actually asked Ukraine to interfere....

New Documents Could Spell Trouble For Biden In Ukraine Scandal, Report Says

Investigative reporter John Solomon said on Wednesday night that he has obtained over 450 pages of legal documents that could spell serious problems for Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden regarding the ongoing Ukraine scandal.

“Listen there were three attempts in 2016 by the Democratic Party, in the Democratic establishment, to get Ukraine involved in our elections so Democrats were for Ukraine interference in our election before they were against it, that is an irrefutable fact that documents and the statements on the record have been reported in my column,” Solomon began. “You can download the documents, don’t trust me, go read them yourselves.”

Solomon then transitioned into talking about the big development in the story: the hundreds of pages of legal documents he obtained that he claims show that the story that Biden has told the American public is not true.

“Here’s the most important thing: Joe Biden has staked out a very specific story now and with impeachment proceedings, that story is fair game to investigate,” Solomon continued. “He says when he fired the Ukraine general prosecutor … he did so solely because he believed that prosecutor was corrupt and not because that prosecutor was investigating his son’s company and making plans to hunt interview Hunter Biden at the very moment he was fired. That’s his story, that has to hold up.”
 

Forum List

Back
Top