ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
In what method of arson is being used to say that thugs had to do it together?
Was one holding a stick and the other blowing on the fire?
I didn't say they did it together. My point was that if their protest is against the police, why isn't the target the police station? I'm not advocating they do that but since they've shown they will set buildings on fire, what does setting a local mom and pop store on fire have to do with their protesting?
Who's protesting? Because thugs werent protesting they were destroying stuff.
You seem to merge the two a lot. One person set the building on fire yet you blame it on "thugs" plural. Then say that the thugs are the protesters.
They are protesting. The form of protest they use is unjustified burning of buildings. Protests don't have to be peaceful to be a protests.
Who is protesting? The protesters or the thugs?