Conservative blocks bill giving girls protection from FGM

[Tommy Tainant]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

 

[OnePercenter]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

MAGA hat wearers can marry preteens in Tennessee. Democrats want it stopped, Republicans don't.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

MAGA hat wearers can marry preteens in Tennessee. Democrats want it stopped, Republicans don't.

For real ?

 

[JGalt]

The age of consent in many Mexican states and South American countries is 12 years old.

Democrats/liberals/progressives/socialists want to open the border to sex-offenders, give them driver's licenses, register them to vote, and move them in next door to where you, your wife, and your 12 year old daughter lives.

Don't blame conservatives when your 12 year old daughter gets raped or comes up pregnant.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The age of consent in many Mexican states and South American countries is 12 years old.

Democrats/liberals/progressives/socialists want to open the border to sex-offenders, give them driver's licenses, register them to vote, and move them in next door to where you, your wife, and your 12 year old daughter lives.

Don't blame conservatives when your 12 year old daughter gets raped or comes up pregnant.

Its 17 in mexico you lying shit.

 

[JGalt]

The age of consent in many Mexican states and South American countries is 12 years old.

Democrats/liberals/progressives/socialists want to open the border to sex-offenders, give them driver's licenses, register them to vote, and move them in next door to where you, your wife, and your 12 year old daughter lives.

Don't blame conservatives when your 12 year old daughter gets raped or comes up pregnant.

Its 17 in mexico you lying shit.

It is but it's not enforced. The age of consent in Honduras is 15, assmunch. The majority of those in the caravan are from Honduras. The age of consent is even lower in some South American countries from which we get immigrants, and even down to 12 years old from some of the places you get your immigrants.

 

[OnePercenter]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

MAGA hat wearers can marry preteens in Tennessee. Democrats want it stopped, Republicans don't.

For real ?

Yes

Tennessee Lawmakers Struggle To Decide: How Young Is Too Young To Marry?

 

[OnePercenter]

The age of consent in many Mexican states and South American countries is 12 years old.

Democrats/liberals/progressives/socialists want to open the border to sex-offenders, give them driver's licenses, register them to vote, and move them in next door to where you, your wife, and your 12 year old daughter lives.

Don't blame conservatives when your 12 year old daughter gets raped or comes up pregnant.

The issue is the United States. Please try to focus.

Keeping your 12 year old away from tRump youth is a good start of protecting her.

 

[OnePercenter]

The age of consent in many Mexican states and South American countries is 12 years old.

Democrats/liberals/progressives/socialists want to open the border to sex-offenders, give them driver's licenses, register them to vote, and move them in next door to where you, your wife, and your 12 year old daughter lives.

Don't blame conservatives when your 12 year old daughter gets raped or comes up pregnant.

Its 17 in mexico you lying shit.

It is but it's not enforced. The age of consent in Honduras is 15, assmunch. The majority of those in the caravan are from Honduras. The age of consent is even lower in some South American countries from which we get immigrants, and even down to 12 years old from some of the places you get your immigrants.

Eliminate the opportunity for jobs and they won't come. Jail the employers that hire illegals, including tRump.

 

[Olde Europe]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

Sir Christopher does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation because he does not think they receive proper scrutiny.

He has previously argued that it is the government’s job to introduce its own FGM bill.

Yet the government had supported the proposed legislation, keen to see it pass as a private member’s bill.​

Several things here. First, how is it even possible that, in the Mother of Parliaments, the very notion of legislation initiated by MPs is objectionable?

Second: Can you explain why on earth government would be keen to see FGM protections "pass as a private member’s bill"? Doesn't Her Majesty's Government want to be seen protecting girls against this ghoulish practice?

Third: Is it actually the case that in the UK children in risk of serious harm, bodily or otherwise, are unprotected, courts powerless and unable "to issue protection orders"? For to me it seems, if this is indeed the case, far more sweeping legislation protecting children would be necessary. If not, and courts have this power already, what's the benefit of anti-FGM legislation - other than a symbolic victory for Ms Ali?

I suspect, the courts do have considerable power protecting children against all kinds of harm, and the monstrosity that is FGM in particular. What needs to be done would then be, in my opinion, is not to pass more redundant, symbolic legislation, but education, information, counseling (etc.) specifically targeting communities where the practice is rampant, so as to avert the mutilation and really protect girls, and even before the courts get involved.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

Sir Christopher does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation because he does not think they receive proper scrutiny.

He has previously argued that it is the government’s job to introduce its own FGM bill.

Yet the government had supported the proposed legislation, keen to see it pass as a private member’s bill.​

Several things here. First, how is it even possible that, in the Mother of Parliaments, the very notion of legislation initiated by MPs is objectionable?

Second: Can you explain why on earth government would be keen to see FGM protections "pass as a private member’s bill"? Doesn't Her Majesty's Government want to be seen protecting girls against this ghoulish practice?

Third: Is it actually the case that in the UK children in risk of serious harm, bodily or otherwise, are unprotected, courts powerless and unable "to issue protection orders"? For to me it seems, if this is indeed the case, far more sweeping legislation protecting children would be necessary. If not, and courts have this power already, what's the benefit of anti-FGM legislation - other than a symbolic victory for Ms Ali?

I suspect, the courts do have considerable power protecting children against all kinds of harm, and the monstrosity that is FGM in particular. What needs to be done would then be, in my opinion, is not to pass more redundant, symbolic legislation, but education, information, counseling (etc.) specifically targeting communities where the practice is rampant, so as to avert the mutilation and really protect girls, and even before the courts get involved.

I am not an expert on the law in this respect. The bill seems to be giving the courts greater powers in dealing with the issues ,which suggests there is already legislation in place.

This character is selective in the bills he opposes. He is a loon of long standing. The government will now have to put forward legislation which might take a while given the chaos in government.

 

[Olde Europe]

I am not an expert on the law in this respect. The bill seems to be giving the courts greater powers in dealing with the issues ,which suggests there is already legislation in place.

This character is selective in the bills he opposes. He is a loon of long standing. The government will now have to put forward legislation which might take a while given the chaos in government.

No experts we are, both. Still, the bill "would amend the Children’s Act 1989", and thus I would conclude that protections against harm should be there already.

My point is twofold, while my interest in that "loon of long standing" is minimal: Dysfunctional parliament / democracy, and symbolic legislation changing little to nothing while the real work of protecting children would require real (wo)manpower, and some hard thinking, not to mention, real money put to good effect. That is to say, if that loon's performance serves to reveal some dysfunction that would otherwise go undetected, he may have served a good cause, albeit unwittingly.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I am not an expert on the law in this respect. The bill seems to be giving the courts greater powers in dealing with the issues ,which suggests there is already legislation in place.

This character is selective in the bills he opposes. He is a loon of long standing. The government will now have to put forward legislation which might take a while given the chaos in government.

No experts we are, both. Still, the bill "would amend the Children’s Act 1989", and thus I would conclude that protections against harm should be there already.

My point is twofold, while my interest in that "loon of long standing" is minimal: Dysfunctional parliament / democracy, and symbolic legislation changing little to nothing while the real work of protecting children would require real (wo)manpower, and some hard thinking, not to mention, real money put to good effect. That is to say, if that loon's performance serves to reveal some dysfunction that would otherwise go undetected, he may have served a good cause, albeit unwittingly.

I see the UK as treading water whilst one issue overshadows everything. Child protection is one of many areas that have been damaged by austerity. Every area of our national life has been decimated. Whether a post brexit Britain will have the money to turn it around is something that I cant even begin to contemplate.

 

[Olde Europe]

I see the UK as treading water whilst one issue overshadows everything. Child protection is one of many areas that have been damaged by austerity. Every area of our national life has been decimated. Whether a post brexit Britain will have the money to turn it around is something that I cant even begin to contemplate.

Britain, I would think, has all the money it needs to provide for a decent society - provided she decides to raise the funds in an equitable way, and to adjust spending priorities - including protecting children. Takes a bit of political will, though.

 

[Correll]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

You lie. From your own link.



"
Sir Christopher does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation because he does not think they receive proper scrutiny.

He has previously argued that it is the government’s job to introduce its own FGM bill."

 

[Weatherman2020]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

About time somebody stood up for the oppressed Muslims in the UK.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

You lie. From your own link.



"
Sir Christopher does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation because he does not think they receive proper scrutiny.

He has previously argued that it is the government’s job to introduce its own FGM bill."

From my own link.

Zac Goldsmith questioned his fellow Tory MP’s motivations, asking on Twitter: “If he is acting on principle, as he wants people to believe, why does he often allow Bills put forward by his friends to pass through unchallenged?”

Sir Christopher did not object to private members’ bills sponsored by fellow Tory MP Peter Bone in the Commons this afternoon.

He is a hypocrite and even his own party are ashamed of him. Did you miss this bit klan boy ?

 

[Correll]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

You lie. From your own link.



"
Sir Christopher does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation because he does not think they receive proper scrutiny.

He has previously argued that it is the government’s job to introduce its own FGM bill."

From my own link.

Zac Goldsmith questioned his fellow Tory MP’s motivations, asking on Twitter: “If he is acting on principle, as he wants people to believe, why does he often allow Bills put forward by his friends to pass through unchallenged?”

Sir Christopher did not object to private members’ bills sponsored by fellow Tory MP Peter Bone in the Commons this afternoon.

He is a hypocrite and even his own party are ashamed of him. Did you miss this bit klan boy ?

He might very well be a hypocrite. But that is not what you claimed in the op. In the op, you pretended he was against protecting girls from fgm.


Why you lie?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

You lie. From your own link.



"
Sir Christopher does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation because he does not think they receive proper scrutiny.

He has previously argued that it is the government’s job to introduce its own FGM bill."

From my own link.

Zac Goldsmith questioned his fellow Tory MP’s motivations, asking on Twitter: “If he is acting on principle, as he wants people to believe, why does he often allow Bills put forward by his friends to pass through unchallenged?”

Sir Christopher did not object to private members’ bills sponsored by fellow Tory MP Peter Bone in the Commons this afternoon.

He is a hypocrite and even his own party are ashamed of him. Did you miss this bit klan boy ?

He might very well be a hypocrite. But that is not what you claimed in the op. In the op, you pretended he was against protecting girls from fgm.


Why you lie?

Well he is. He killed a bill backed by the government and with cross party support.That is the bottom line.

 

[Correll]

Tory MP blocks bill to protect girls from FGM

Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope – the politician widely condemned for objecting to a bill to outlaw upskirting – has blocked legislation designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).

The 71-year-old member for Christchurch was heavily criticised for obstructing the legislation on Friday, and was called an “embarrassment to ... party and humanity” by leading anti-FGM campaigner Nimco Ali.

Sir Christopher blocked a bill tabled by crossbench peer Lord Berkeley to allow courts to issue protection orders if a child is at risk of FGM. He objected to the bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons this afternoon.

What a twat.

You lie. From your own link.



"
Sir Christopher does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation because he does not think they receive proper scrutiny.

He has previously argued that it is the government’s job to introduce its own FGM bill."

From my own link.

Zac Goldsmith questioned his fellow Tory MP’s motivations, asking on Twitter: “If he is acting on principle, as he wants people to believe, why does he often allow Bills put forward by his friends to pass through unchallenged?”

Sir Christopher did not object to private members’ bills sponsored by fellow Tory MP Peter Bone in the Commons this afternoon.

He is a hypocrite and even his own party are ashamed of him. Did you miss this bit klan boy ?

He might very well be a hypocrite. But that is not what you claimed in the op. In the op, you pretended he was against protecting girls from fgm.


Why you lie?

Well he is. He killed a bill backed by the government and with cross party support.That is the bottom line.

No, it is not the bottom line.


The bottom line is that he opposed it because he disagreed with the way it was done.


That you have to lie about this, shows that you know that you are in the wrong.