TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #41
The Gowdy clip in rotation is of him stating to the Press that his investigation found nothing new new about Benghazi.
#LOLGOP!
Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Gowdy clip in rotation is of him stating to the Press that his investigation found nothing new new about Benghazi.
#LOLGOP!
Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk
Can you imagine her debating that idiot trump. It would be laughable.Agree. There is no other candidate, Republican or Democrat, who is better prepared and better equiped to be the next president of the US.That was a stunning performance: calm, collected, in command-- knowledgeable of the intricacies of all parts of government. She slaughtered the Republican nut cases and exposed them for who they really are. She withstood 11 HOURS of ASSAULT, and came out on top. There was no one in that room with the amount of intelligence Hillary displayed.....
That's irrelevant. What's relevant is if you have determined she did not do well and your being able to explain that with supporting evidence. Go ahead....we're waiting.Liberals were impressed with Hillary. Even they didn't know she could lie that much.What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
This poster is exactly the kind of circle the wagons deadender who is still going to try to claim that Clinton did poorly.
When they are all that's left, you know who won the battle.
You're the kind that had already determined Clinton did well before she ever answered a question. When you do that, it proves what I said.
You need to see a psychiatrist if you thing Hillary isn't responsible because you're crazy. After that, see a Proctologist and see if he can pull your head out of your ass.Watching those insane crazed Benghazoids going at Hillary was like being forced to watch Fox news ....I am going to make a Dr appointment to see if it hurt my health....
That's irrelevant. What's relevant is if you have determined she did not do well and your being able to explain that with supporting evidence. Go ahead....we're waiting.Liberals were impressed with Hillary. Even they didn't know she could lie that much.What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
This poster is exactly the kind of circle the wagons deadender who is still going to try to claim that Clinton did poorly.
When they are all that's left, you know who won the battle.
You're the kind that had already determined Clinton did well before she ever answered a question. When you do that, it proves what I said.
So, it's irrelevant that someone decided Hillary did well BEFORE she testified? Thanks for proving my point.
I determined it based on what she said AFTER having watched it.
I didn't prove your point. You really had no point; you just made an unsupported accusation. You need to get on top of this: what was asked was for you to prove, with evidence, that she didn't do well. Can you do that? Go ahead, we are waiting.That's irrelevant. What's relevant is if you have determined she did not do well and your being able to explain that with supporting evidence. Go ahead....we're waiting.Liberals were impressed with Hillary. Even they didn't know she could lie that much.What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
This poster is exactly the kind of circle the wagons deadender who is still going to try to claim that Clinton did poorly.
When they are all that's left, you know who won the battle.
You're the kind that had already determined Clinton did well before she ever answered a question. When you do that, it proves what I said.
So, it's irrelevant that someone decided Hillary did well BEFORE she testified? Thanks for proving my point.
I determined it based on what she said AFTER having watched it.
Liberals were impressed with Hillary. Even they didn't know she could lie that much.What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
This poster is exactly the kind of circle the wagons deadender who is still going to try to claim that Clinton did poorly.
When they are all that's left, you know who won the battle.
You're the kind that had already determined Clinton did well before she ever answered a question. When you do that, it proves what I said.
This is true. I've seen it.Liberals were impressed with Hillary. Even they didn't know she could lie that much.What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
This poster is exactly the kind of circle the wagons deadender who is still going to try to claim that Clinton did poorly.
When they are all that's left, you know who won the battle.
You're the kind that had already determined Clinton did well before she ever answered a question. When you do that, it proves what I said.
My record of NOT supporting Hillary Clinton is well documented for all to see right on this forum.
But Rush is a moron, supported by retards.Rush thought it was brilliant
What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
troll alert!But Rush is a moron, supported by retards.Rush thought it was brilliant
YOU support Rush, then?
delusion on displayOf course he did.Rush thought it was brilliant, this teed up endless ammo for attack ads on Hillary and some debate zingers. Poor libs they just can't catch a break lately.
I didn't prove your point. You really had no point; you just made an unsupported accusation. You need to get on top of this: what was asked was for you to prove, with evidence, that she didn't do well. Can you do that? Go ahead, we are waiting.That's irrelevant. What's relevant is if you have determined she did not do well and your being able to explain that with supporting evidence. Go ahead....we're waiting.Liberals were impressed with Hillary. Even they didn't know she could lie that much.
This poster is exactly the kind of circle the wagons deadender who is still going to try to claim that Clinton did poorly.
When they are all that's left, you know who won the battle.
You're the kind that had already determined Clinton did well before she ever answered a question. When you do that, it proves what I said.
So, it's irrelevant that someone decided Hillary did well BEFORE she testified? Thanks for proving my point.
I determined it based on what she said AFTER having watched it.
Or did you determine she did well? You are not very clear.
Never heard of any of these people.What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
Rush thought it was brilliant, this teed up endless ammo for attack ads on Hillary and some debate zingers. Poor libs they just can't catch a break lately.
Liberals were impressed with Hillary. Even they didn't know she could lie that much.What a bunch of palookas!
Conservative pundits were not impressed with the GOP's disastrous Benghazi hearing
Unless something happens, it's starting to look like Hillary Clinton won't merely survive this hearing -- she will have come out on top.
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) October 22, 2015
Hillary = Lucy GOP = Charlie Brown Except the football is a grenade and Charlie Brown wrestles until he grabs it, unpins, and swallows it.
— Michael B Dougherty (@michaelbd) October 22, 2015
Why doesn't Pompeo just go over and swear her in for president now--if he goes on like this he'll practically get her elected
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 22, 2015
Pompeo's second round of questioning was snarky in tone and ineffective in substance. A net negative.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 22, 2015
This poster is exactly the kind of circle the wagons deadender who is still going to try to claim that Clinton did poorly.
When they are all that's left, you know who won the battle.
You're the kind that had already determined Clinton did well before she ever answered a question. When you do that, it proves what I said.
My record of NOT supporting Hillary Clinton is well documented for all to see right on this forum.