Listening to talking heads, and reading all of the stuff about the NSA PRISIM Scandal, is dangerous to ones mental well-being. After reading that Nancy Pelosis pet monkey, Steny Hoyer, is defending civil liberties I made an appointment with a local shrink:
I am not certain how taking liberty away from Americans increases their security. Loss liberty might even diminish security if enough free Americans figure out that fighting for the current scum in government is not the same as fighting for their country:
Also, one assumes that Hoyers definition of the general welfare justifies everything Democrats do:
Since tax dollars pay for the NSA program in question, lost liberty must fall under Hoyers definition of general welfare. I only wish Democrat sneaks would worry less about my welfare and more about my constitutional Rights.
Hoyer is right about one thing. There is no comparison between Husseins attack on Americans, and the way Bush used the Patriotic Act.
NOTE: It all began with FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) the 1977 brainchild of the filthiest bum that ever served in the US Senate Ted Kennedy. It was signed in 1978 by another disaster Jimmy Carter. FOREIGN was the key word. The Patriot Act came after 9-11-2001. As far as I know, NSA intelligence gathering is restricted to foreign communications.
Bottom line: As soon as Democrats saw that technology was available they used it against Americans under the pretext of national security.
Heres one thing that astounds me. The Russians told the FBI about the Boston bombers:
Yet Joe Car and his dead brother succeeded; so I dont know how the hell anybody can believe that collecting millions of telephone calls and e-mails every day is going to provide more security. I do know that the whole thing smells like the bums in government are creating more well-paying jobs for parasites.
On an offbeat note, Americans are still paying a telephone tax/fee to fight the Spanish-American War. Check your phone bill. I cant prove it, but I have a feeling there is a philosophical connection to the NSAs telephone skullduggery and Teddy Roosevelt charging up San Juan Hill. After watching government officials testify I can only paraphrase a bunch of people Truth is still the first casualty of war.
Ill close with a question and answer: Why is it that Democrats always claim they are defending this country whenever they shred the Constitution? Answer: Because in order to advance worldwide socialism the Constitution stands in their way.
Hoyer cited a recent poll indicating that most Americans appear willing to sacrifice some privacy for the sake of security.
"While they're concerned about their privacy, they're more concerned about their security. And they see the benefit of making sure that authorities have enough information to interdict and to prevent terrorist acts," Hoyer said. "Having said that, Americans feel very strongly about their civil liberties and privacy, as do I, and we need to ensure the proper oversight."
Hoyer: No comparison between Obama, Bush secret surveillance
By Mike Lillis - 06/11/13 01:21 PM ET
Hoyer: No comparison between Obama, Bush on secret NSA surveillance - The Hill - covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill | TheHill.com
I am not certain how taking liberty away from Americans increases their security. Loss liberty might even diminish security if enough free Americans figure out that fighting for the current scum in government is not the same as fighting for their country:
Remember this, take it to heart, live by it, die for it if necessary: that our patriotism is medieval, outworn, obsolete; that the modern patriotism, the true patriotism, the only rational patriotism, is loyalty to the Nation ALL the time, loyalty to the Government when it deserves it. Mark Twain
Also, one assumes that Hoyers definition of the general welfare justifies everything Democrats do:
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said that the individual health insurance mandates included in every health reform bill, which require Americans to have insurance, were like paying taxes. He added that Congress has broad authority to force Americans to purchase other things as well, so long as it was trying to promote the general welfare.
Hoyer Says Constitutions General Welfare Clause Empowers Congress to Order Americans to Buy Health Insurance
October 21, 2009
By Matt COVER
Hoyer Says Constitution?s ?General Welfare? Clause Empowers Congress to Order Americans to Buy Health Insurance | CNS News
Since tax dollars pay for the NSA program in question, lost liberty must fall under Hoyers definition of general welfare. I only wish Democrat sneaks would worry less about my welfare and more about my constitutional Rights.
Hoyer is right about one thing. There is no comparison between Husseins attack on Americans, and the way Bush used the Patriotic Act.
NOTE: It all began with FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) the 1977 brainchild of the filthiest bum that ever served in the US Senate Ted Kennedy. It was signed in 1978 by another disaster Jimmy Carter. FOREIGN was the key word. The Patriot Act came after 9-11-2001. As far as I know, NSA intelligence gathering is restricted to foreign communications.
Bottom line: As soon as Democrats saw that technology was available they used it against Americans under the pretext of national security.
Heres one thing that astounds me. The Russians told the FBI about the Boston bombers:
Yet Joe Car and his dead brother succeeded; so I dont know how the hell anybody can believe that collecting millions of telephone calls and e-mails every day is going to provide more security. I do know that the whole thing smells like the bums in government are creating more well-paying jobs for parasites.
On an offbeat note, Americans are still paying a telephone tax/fee to fight the Spanish-American War. Check your phone bill. I cant prove it, but I have a feeling there is a philosophical connection to the NSAs telephone skullduggery and Teddy Roosevelt charging up San Juan Hill. After watching government officials testify I can only paraphrase a bunch of people Truth is still the first casualty of war.
Ill close with a question and answer: Why is it that Democrats always claim they are defending this country whenever they shred the Constitution? Answer: Because in order to advance worldwide socialism the Constitution stands in their way.