Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do believe he has a responsibility to come forward with the names, and for many and more of the reasons you list.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information. It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean. I'm glad their ridiculous policies around reporting sexual harassment have been made public. Thirty days of required counseling before a claim will even be accepted? What on Earth is that all about? And the nondisclosure agreement that is mandatory?Everyone on that list is allegedly someone who has settled a harassment charge. I am making the assumption that these charges are of a sexual nature or we would not likely even know of its existence.I think it's more a reflection of what kind of guy Conyer is. I hate those types--have seen them in work situations start running their mouths about coworkers when they get canned. Dangerous people.Yes. However, the real question is this.Conyers could have details on Republicans, too.
![]()
If he has information that will bring down others, that means he is aware of wrongdoing by many and now he is saying I'll release this information if I suffer.
I'd like to know where the outcry is that he is not doing the right thing and releasing the information regardless of his personal cost.
This is what is wrong with D.C. People know of crimes committed, past and present, and won't divulge this information unless there is a personal gain.
It is a reflection of what kind of society we are.
That being the case, everyone who has settled a sexual harassment case can be considered 'dangerous' and should not hold office.
The people have a right to know this information and Conyor or any of them withholding the information as some kind of insurance smacks of a moral turpitude if not an outright abuse of power.
Ooh, boy, that sucks and if I have to suffer through the stories of every horny old goat in the House and Senate, it will be worth it if that reporting policy is changed.
I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information. It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean. I'm glad their ridiculous policies around reporting sexual harassment have been made public. Thirty days of required counseling before a claim will even be accepted? What on Earth is that all about? And the nondisclosure agreement that is mandatory?Everyone on that list is allegedly someone who has settled a harassment charge. I am making the assumption that these charges are of a sexual nature or we would not likely even know of its existence.I think it's more a reflection of what kind of guy Conyer is. I hate those types--have seen them in work situations start running their mouths about coworkers when they get canned. Dangerous people.Yes. However, the real question is this.Conyers could have details on Republicans, too.
![]()
If he has information that will bring down others, that means he is aware of wrongdoing by many and now he is saying I'll release this information if I suffer.
I'd like to know where the outcry is that he is not doing the right thing and releasing the information regardless of his personal cost.
This is what is wrong with D.C. People know of crimes committed, past and present, and won't divulge this information unless there is a personal gain.
It is a reflection of what kind of society we are.
That being the case, everyone who has settled a sexual harassment case can be considered 'dangerous' and should not hold office.
The people have a right to know this information and Conyor or any of them withholding the information as some kind of insurance smacks of a moral turpitude if not an outright abuse of power.
Ooh, boy, that sucks and if I have to suffer through the stories of every horny old goat in the House and Senate, it will be worth it if that reporting policy is changed.
I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information.
It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean.
Xelor, the HR policies in the Congress should be addressed. Settlements, as I'm sure you know being a businessman, are frequently cheaper than defending the accused. Even when the accused is innocent. It happens every single day. That may be part of the reason nondisclosure agreements are required. However, this same policy hides bad acting where it does exist. I would think that if there have been multiple suits with similar allegations, all "settled," there would be good reason to believe that person has a problem.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information. It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean. I'm glad their ridiculous policies around reporting sexual harassment have been made public. Thirty days of required counseling before a claim will even be accepted? What on Earth is that all about? And the nondisclosure agreement that is mandatory?Everyone on that list is allegedly someone who has settled a harassment charge. I am making the assumption that these charges are of a sexual nature or we would not likely even know of its existence.I think it's more a reflection of what kind of guy Conyer is. I hate those types--have seen them in work situations start running their mouths about coworkers when they get canned. Dangerous people.Yes. However, the real question is this.Conyers could have details on Republicans, too.
![]()
If he has information that will bring down others, that means he is aware of wrongdoing by many and now he is saying I'll release this information if I suffer.
I'd like to know where the outcry is that he is not doing the right thing and releasing the information regardless of his personal cost.
This is what is wrong with D.C. People know of crimes committed, past and present, and won't divulge this information unless there is a personal gain.
It is a reflection of what kind of society we are.
That being the case, everyone who has settled a sexual harassment case can be considered 'dangerous' and should not hold office.
The people have a right to know this information and Conyor or any of them withholding the information as some kind of insurance smacks of a moral turpitude if not an outright abuse of power.
Ooh, boy, that sucks and if I have to suffer through the stories of every horny old goat in the House and Senate, it will be worth it if that reporting policy is changed.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information.
Well, if he's got the information, it's credible, and nobody else, not even the perps themselves, proffers it, who will?
It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean.
It was up to the cads to not do it in the first place. They did it and are doing all they can to hide it. I understand why they're doing so, but that doesn't mean I have to condone their doing so or their having done the deed, as it were. Truly, I don't know how, after doing what they've done, any of them can sleep well at night. I damn sure couldn't.
Xelor, the HR policies in the Congress should be addressed. Settlements, as I'm sure you know being a businessman, are frequently cheaper than defending the accused. Even when the accused is innocent. It happens every single day. That may be part of the reason nondisclosure agreements are required. However, this same policy hides bad acting where it does exist. I would think that if there have been multiple suits with similar allegations, all "settled," there would be good reason to believe that person has a problem.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information. It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean. I'm glad their ridiculous policies around reporting sexual harassment have been made public. Thirty days of required counseling before a claim will even be accepted? What on Earth is that all about? And the nondisclosure agreement that is mandatory?Everyone on that list is allegedly someone who has settled a harassment charge. I am making the assumption that these charges are of a sexual nature or we would not likely even know of its existence.I think it's more a reflection of what kind of guy Conyer is. I hate those types--have seen them in work situations start running their mouths about coworkers when they get canned. Dangerous people.Yes. However, the real question is this.
If he has information that will bring down others, that means he is aware of wrongdoing by many and now he is saying I'll release this information if I suffer.
I'd like to know where the outcry is that he is not doing the right thing and releasing the information regardless of his personal cost.
This is what is wrong with D.C. People know of crimes committed, past and present, and won't divulge this information unless there is a personal gain.
It is a reflection of what kind of society we are.
That being the case, everyone who has settled a sexual harassment case can be considered 'dangerous' and should not hold office.
The people have a right to know this information and Conyor or any of them withholding the information as some kind of insurance smacks of a moral turpitude if not an outright abuse of power.
Ooh, boy, that sucks and if I have to suffer through the stories of every horny old goat in the House and Senate, it will be worth it if that reporting policy is changed.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information.
Well, if he's got the information, it's credible, and nobody else, not even the perps themselves, proffers it, who will?
It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean.
It was up to the cads to not do it in the first place. They did it and are doing all they can to hide it. I understand why they're doing so, but that doesn't mean I have to condone their doing so or their having done the deed, as it were. Truly, I don't know how, after doing what they've done, any of them can sleep well at night. I damn sure couldn't.
It's pretty murky, still, don't you think, even if the list comes out?
Settlements, as I'm sure you know being a businessman, are frequently cheaper than defending the accused. Even when the accused is innocent. It happens every single day. That may be part of the reason nondisclosure agreements are required.
It's pretty murky, still, don't you think, even if the list comes out?
Denny Hastert was convicted of moving his money around. He served a year.http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/11/rep_conyers_lawyer_hints_he_will_take_down_many_other_congressional_harassers_if_he_is_pushed_too_hard.html
Is this era of President Donald J. Trump Great or What?
I love watching the liberals eat their own.....
The party of women, what a friggin joke.....
Watch and wait for the dirty liberals to back
off on him and franken.
Remember Denny Hastert?
Republucans are going down
I bet he does.....perverts stick together.....just look at trump supporting Moore for that.Conyers could have details on Republicans, too.
![]()
I'm sure neither "side" has a monopoly on the behavior, as much as their flocks wish it were so, for pure political advantage.I bet he does.....perverts stick together.....just look at trump supporting Moore for that.Conyers could have details on Republicans, too.
yeah, heaven forbids that a President abides by the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'.I bet he does.....perverts stick together.....just look at trump supporting Moore for that.Conyers could have details on Republicans, too.
![]()
Xelor, the HR policies in the Congress should be addressed. Settlements, as I'm sure you know being a businessman, are frequently cheaper than defending the accused. Even when the accused is innocent. It happens every single day. That may be part of the reason nondisclosure agreements are required. However, this same policy hides bad acting where it does exist. I would think that if there have been multiple suits with similar allegations, all "settled," there would be good reason to believe that person has a problem.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information. It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean. I'm glad their ridiculous policies around reporting sexual harassment have been made public. Thirty days of required counseling before a claim will even be accepted? What on Earth is that all about? And the nondisclosure agreement that is mandatory?Everyone on that list is allegedly someone who has settled a harassment charge. I am making the assumption that these charges are of a sexual nature or we would not likely even know of its existence.I think it's more a reflection of what kind of guy Conyer is. I hate those types--have seen them in work situations start running their mouths about coworkers when they get canned. Dangerous people.Yes. However, the real question is this.
If he has information that will bring down others, that means he is aware of wrongdoing by many and now he is saying I'll release this information if I suffer.
I'd like to know where the outcry is that he is not doing the right thing and releasing the information regardless of his personal cost.
This is what is wrong with D.C. People know of crimes committed, past and present, and won't divulge this information unless there is a personal gain.
It is a reflection of what kind of society we are.
That being the case, everyone who has settled a sexual harassment case can be considered 'dangerous' and should not hold office.
The people have a right to know this information and Conyor or any of them withholding the information as some kind of insurance smacks of a moral turpitude if not an outright abuse of power.
Ooh, boy, that sucks and if I have to suffer through the stories of every horny old goat in the House and Senate, it will be worth it if that reporting policy is changed.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information.
Well, if he's got the information, it's credible, and nobody else, not even the perps themselves, proffers it, who will?
It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean.
It was up to the cads to not do it in the first place. They did it and are doing all they can to hide it. I understand why they're doing so, but that doesn't mean I have to condone their doing so or their having done the deed, as it were. Truly, I don't know how, after doing what they've done, any of them can sleep well at night. I damn sure couldn't.
It's pretty murky, still, don't you think, even if the list comes out?
The fact is this congressman is actually using blackmail to avoid being held accountable for his actions.
How fucking low is that?
Xelor, the HR policies in the Congress should be addressed. Settlements, as I'm sure you know being a businessman, are frequently cheaper than defending the accused. Even when the accused is innocent. It happens every single day. That may be part of the reason nondisclosure agreements are required. However, this same policy hides bad acting where it does exist. I would think that if there have been multiple suits with similar allegations, all "settled," there would be good reason to believe that person has a problem.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information. It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean. I'm glad their ridiculous policies around reporting sexual harassment have been made public. Thirty days of required counseling before a claim will even be accepted? What on Earth is that all about? And the nondisclosure agreement that is mandatory?Everyone on that list is allegedly someone who has settled a harassment charge. I am making the assumption that these charges are of a sexual nature or we would not likely even know of its existence.I think it's more a reflection of what kind of guy Conyer is. I hate those types--have seen them in work situations start running their mouths about coworkers when they get canned. Dangerous people.
That being the case, everyone who has settled a sexual harassment case can be considered 'dangerous' and should not hold office.
The people have a right to know this information and Conyor or any of them withholding the information as some kind of insurance smacks of a moral turpitude if not an outright abuse of power.
Ooh, boy, that sucks and if I have to suffer through the stories of every horny old goat in the House and Senate, it will be worth it if that reporting policy is changed.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information.
Well, if he's got the information, it's credible, and nobody else, not even the perps themselves, proffers it, who will?
It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean.
It was up to the cads to not do it in the first place. They did it and are doing all they can to hide it. I understand why they're doing so, but that doesn't mean I have to condone their doing so or their having done the deed, as it were. Truly, I don't know how, after doing what they've done, any of them can sleep well at night. I damn sure couldn't.
It's pretty murky, still, don't you think, even if the list comes out?
Maybe the list is all Republicans and Dems can take back Congress and the Presidency.
I don’t know why anyone wouldn’t want full transparency for their elected officials.
I don’t know why anyone wouldn’t want full transparency for their elected officials.
Conyers could have details on Republicans, too.
![]()
The fact is this congressman is actually using blackmail to avoid being held accountable for his actions.
How fucking low is that?
Xelor, the HR policies in the Congress should be addressed. Settlements, as I'm sure you know being a businessman, are frequently cheaper than defending the accused. Even when the accused is innocent. It happens every single day. That may be part of the reason nondisclosure agreements are required. However, this same policy hides bad acting where it does exist. I would think that if there have been multiple suits with similar allegations, all "settled," there would be good reason to believe that person has a problem.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information. It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean. I'm glad their ridiculous policies around reporting sexual harassment have been made public. Thirty days of required counseling before a claim will even be accepted? What on Earth is that all about? And the nondisclosure agreement that is mandatory?Everyone on that list is allegedly someone who has settled a harassment charge. I am making the assumption that these charges are of a sexual nature or we would not likely even know of its existence.I think it's more a reflection of what kind of guy Conyer is. I hate those types--have seen them in work situations start running their mouths about coworkers when they get canned. Dangerous people.
That being the case, everyone who has settled a sexual harassment case can be considered 'dangerous' and should not hold office.
The people have a right to know this information and Conyor or any of them withholding the information as some kind of insurance smacks of a moral turpitude if not an outright abuse of power.
Ooh, boy, that sucks and if I have to suffer through the stories of every horny old goat in the House and Senate, it will be worth it if that reporting policy is changed.I agree harassers shouldn't get away with it, but I don't believe it is Conyer's place to release that information.
Well, if he's got the information, it's credible, and nobody else, not even the perps themselves, proffers it, who will?
It is up to the Congress's powers that be to come clean.
It was up to the cads to not do it in the first place. They did it and are doing all they can to hide it. I understand why they're doing so, but that doesn't mean I have to condone their doing so or their having done the deed, as it were. Truly, I don't know how, after doing what they've done, any of them can sleep well at night. I damn sure couldn't.
It's pretty murky, still, don't you think, even if the list comes out?
Maybe the list is all Republicans and Dems can take back Congress and the Presidency.
I don’t know why anyone wouldn’t want full transparency for their elected officials.