Wait, the G7 was worried about corporations moving to a low tax jurisdiction?
Don't they understand that corporations love higher rates and hate lower rates?
Why hasn't one of them put your idea into place and raised rates to 70%?
All the corporations will flood into their country because their WACC is lower.
Right?
And why have not some countries taken the corporate tax rate to zero? I mean then their coffers would be overflowing with all the money coming in. I mean seriously, what part of a curve do you not understand? Is 70% too high? Would it reduce investment and reduce revenue, probably. But on the other hand, 21% is far too low, Trump's corporate tax cut did not pay for itself and resulted in a decline in revenues as a percentage of GDP. The sweet spot, the inflection point, most economist place it at around 45%. That is why Kennedy's income tax cut generated revenue and Reagan's didn't.
They raised the rate from 19% to 25% in April 2023 and Q2 investment went up 4.1%, Q3 investment went up 1.4% and Q4 investment went up 0.5%?
Is the shrinking growth rate a sign of success or a sign of failure?
If it's a success, will they raise the corporate rate from 25% to 31% this year?
Damn, don't those goalposts get heavy, all that moving around you are doing. Corporate tax rates went up, investment went up, precisely what you asked for.
It will decrease demand for Chinese goods and increase demand for domestic and non-Chinese goods. Is that inflationary? How much?
Come on man. Republicans have been for free trade for generations. And it makes sense. And it has for more than 1500 flippin years, since Xenophon.
Research on the impact of Donald Trump’s trade policy finds to the extent a president manages the economy, Trump managed it poorly.
www.forbes.com
While the numbers in that article are absolutely horrifying, this stands out.
The tariffs protect the least efficient firms and reduced their incentives to innovate while hurting the most successful U.S. firms, reducing their ability to innovate.
Wow, I mean just wow. Protecting losers and punishing winners. Absolutely brilliant.
It'll reduce home prices and rents. Less spending on criminal justice, ERs and ESL classes.
I already gave you the first one, reduce home prices and rents. But who does that hurt? Homeowners and those with rental properties. I mean do you guys ever think things through? Besides, I don't think it will result in much of a reduction, maybe for starter homes or rental properties in not the best of neighborhoods. The Feds storm into the trailer park and kick all fifteen illegals that have been renting the single wide. All the interior walls are gone, it is one big shell with cots running down both sides, a nasty ass bathroom, and a kitchen, maybe. I have seen it. Less spending on criminal justice, keep fooling yourself, illegal immigrants break the law less often than natives, and don't even say they are here breaking the law, it is a code violation, like a speeding ticket. Emergency rooms, that one is comical. I will give you an example. I had some neck pain and the doctor sent me to have an x-ray. When I showed up at the imaging center, a little after four in the afternoon, the tech had already went home for the day. They sent me to the hospital. I waltz in, sign some paperwork and then they call me up to pay. List price, over a thousand bucks. But I had insurance with a 20% copay, and they gave me a 25% discount on that for paying up front. I whipped out my card and they swiped it, for THREE BUCKS. The total amount they got, from me and my insurance, $35. If I would have been an illegal immigrant the hospital would be screaming about the thousand bucks they didn't get. It is horseshit. Besides, studies have shown, those illegals, many of them pay, it is an integrity thing with them. The reality of our health care system. Those with insurance don't subsidize those without. Those without subsidize them. And ESL, please. That is an investment. Hell, less than two hundred years ago everyone around here spoke German.
Corporations will produce more here; workers will keep more of their paychecks.
Both should offset a portion of higher import prices.
Corporations may produce more here, but at a higher cost. And employees get to keep more of their paycheck, but until there are spending cuts to offset those taxcuts, and they never are, it is more dollars chasing fewer goods, the very definition of inflation.